· Public charity
All Voting Is Local Action
ALL VOTING IS LOCAL ACTION is a nonpartisan organization that engages in advocacy, legislative action, policy-making, grass-roots mobilization, research and other activities that will both expand the right to vote and oppose and reverse restrictions on voting.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 11 grants below total $227,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $267,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $40,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $23k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $104k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RURALORGANIZINGORG | $100,000 |
| NEVADA VOTER FREEDOM ALLIANCE | $35,000 |
| PASTORS UNITED COMMUNITY ADVOCACY | $15,000 |
| CIVIC ENGAGEMENT BEYOND VOTING | $14,000 |
| ACCESS | $10,000 |
| FREE THE BALLOT INCARCERATED VOTER FAMILY NETWORK | $10,000 |
| FLORIDA RISING TOGETHER | $10,000 |
| EQUAL GROUND ACTION FUND | $10,000 |
| PROGRESS GEORGIA INC | $9,000 |
| FAIR FIGHT ACTION INC | $7,000 |
| BVM CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE | $7,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 15% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Organization was established to coordinate and promote progressive issues, policies, initiatives, and referenda, and to pursue electoral reform that expands access to the ballot.
Informed and educated the public and lawmakers about the benefits of including independent voters in Pennsylvania's primary elections.
Voter education around policy
Empower people and strengthen democratic institutions
(1) Community Outreach to educate on the interconnectivity of systems, and impact structural and systemic change in the areas of criminal, electoral, and economic justice in the United States; and (2) Policy Reform and Direct Lobbying…
Our voice our vote arizona engages in community organizing, leadership development, and civic participation efforts. the organization focuses on voter registration, education, and engagement to strengthen communities and encourage active…
Our goal is to increase power in our communities through effective voting. We increase voter registration and help develop voting infrastructure and to pursue policies that expands access to the ballot.
We strengthen the voice and leadership of our communities to drive meaningful change. Through collective action, we work to break down barriers, improve quality of life, and create a future where our people can thrive with dignity,…
It is the mission of APIAVote to encourage and promote civic participation of Asian Pacific Islander Americans in the electoral and public processes at the national, state, and local levels. APIAVote also aims to educate and inform Asian…
Florida rising, inc. is an independent political organization bringing together black and brown communities to seize power and govern to advance social, economic and racial justice across florida.
Black Phoenix Votes is a year-round political and electoral program grounded in Black liberation, strategic organizing, and bold governance, with a focused presence in Maricopa County. As a project of Black Political Cultivation AZ BPCAZ…
Vote.org's primary purpose is to build web-based technologies that remove barriers to voting and increase vote turnout.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Florida Rising Together Inc and the most unlike its peers is Fuerte Arts Movement. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds RURALORGANIZINGORG ↗
- Who funds ADRC ACTION ↗
- Who funds The Voter Project ↗
- Who funds LIVING UNITED FOR CHANGE IN ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds Fuerte Arts Movement ↗
- Who funds ORGANIZE PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds VOTEAMERICA ↗
- Who funds Civic Engagement Beyond Voting ↗
- Who funds ASIAN AMERICAN ADVOCACY FUND INC ↗
- Who funds PASTORS UNITED COMMUNITY ADVOCACY INC ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA WINS ↗
- Who funds STRAIGHT AHEAD ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA RISING TOGETHER INC ↗
- Who funds 1HOOD POWER ↗
- Who funds FREE THE BALLOT INCARCERATED VOTER FAMILY NETWORK ↗
- Who funds EQUAL GROUND EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds ARAB COMMUNITY CENTER FOR ECONOMIC AND S ↗
- Who funds Progress Georgia Inc ↗
- Who funds FAIR FIGHT ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds BVM CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds OHIO COALITION ON BLACK CIVIC PARTICIPATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Sixteen Thirty Fund · America Votes · All Hands on Deck Network Inc · Tides Foundation · Tides Advocacy · Way to Win Action Fund Inc · Open Society Action Fund Inc · Women Donors Network Action · Working Families Organization Inc · New Venture Fund · Public Wise Inc · Future Forward USA Action
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization All Voting Is Local Action funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to All Voting Is Local Action?
Find your warmest path to All Voting Is Local Action through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.