Skip to content

· Private foundation

Alice Rowan Swanson Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$113k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

International$461kHealth$99kArts & Culture$96kCivil Rights$62kPhilanthropy$29kPublic Safety & Disaster$20kEducation$18kEmployment$16kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $58k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $55k
$5,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC$15,000
UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF$10,000
MIDDLE EAST CHILDRENS ALLIANCE$10,000
OXFAM-AMERICA INC$10,000
AMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID INC$10,000
THE LILIES FOUNDATION$8,000
AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS$5,000
ENGINEERS WITHOUT BORDERS USA INC$5,000
NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND INC$5,000
FRIENDS OF OROKO VILLAGE$5,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC$5,000
JOY OF MUSIC PROGRAM INC$5,000
WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE$2,500
MUSIC WORCESTER INC$2,500
SEEDS OF PEACE INC$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 90% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FRIENDS OF OROKO VILLAGE: $10k → 7%UNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST SERVICE COMMITTEE INC: $5k → 8%OXFAM-AMERICA INC: $10k → 16%OXFAM-AMERICA INC: $10k → 12%MIDDLE EAST CHILDRENS ALLIANCE: $10k → 10%UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $15k → 17%AMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID INC: $10k → 14%BOLOKADA AND FRIENDS VILLAGE PROJECT INC: $5k → 11%ENGINEERS WITHOUT BORDERS USA INC: $5k → 12%METAVIVOR RESEARCH AND SUPPORT INC: $5k → 6%THE LILIES FOUNDATION: $8k → 12%FRIENDS OF OROKO VILLAGE: $10k → 7%UNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST SERVICE COMMITTEE INC: $5k → 8%OXFAM-AMERICA INC: $10k → 16%OXFAM-AMERICA INC: $10k → 12%MIDDLE EAST CHILDRENS ALLIANCE: $10k → 10%UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $10k → 17%AMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID INC: $10k → 14%ENGINEERS WITHOUT BORDERS USA INC: $5k → 12%METAVIVOR RESEARCH AND SUPPORT INC: $5k → 6%THE LILIES FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%FRIENDS OF OROKO VILLAGE: $5k → 7%OXFAM-AMERICA INC: $10k → 16%OXFAM-AMERICA INC - GENERAL DONATIONS ADDRESS: $10k → 12%MIDDLE EAST CHILDRENS ALLIANCE: $10k → 10%UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $10k → 17%THE LILIES FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%OXFAM-AMERICA INC - GENERAL DONATIONS ADDRESS: $10k → 12%MIDDLE EAST CHILDRENS ALLIANCE: $5k → 10%UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $10k → 17%AMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID INC: $10k → 14%THE LILIES FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%OXFAM-AMERICA INC - GENERAL DONATIONS ADDRESS: $10k → 12%MIDDLE EAST CHILDRENS ALLIANCE: $5k → 10%UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $10k → 17%MIDDLE EAST CHILDRENS ALLIANCE: $5k → 10%UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $10k → 17%AMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID INC: $10k → 14%MIDDLE EAST CHILDRENS ALLIANCE: $5k → 10%UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $10k → 17%UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $10k → 17%AMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID INC: $10k → 14%AMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID INC: $10k → 14%AMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID INC: $10k → 14%AMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID INC: $10k → 14%MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $15k → 17%SEEDS OF PEACE INC: $7k → 17%SEEDS OF PEACE INC: $7k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
IA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MD
NC
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$829k · 30 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

30 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
1

Total granted

$829k
$2k

Still filing today

87%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthArts & CultureRecreation & SportsReligionCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
    8× · 2018–2025 · $85k · revenue +47%
  • AMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID
    8× · 2018–2025 · $80k · revenue +153%
  • ME
    MIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE
    8× · 2018–2025 · $55k · revenue +687%

Funded once

  • OB
    OUTWARD BOUND INTERNATIONAL INC
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
3
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
4
Observer Research Foundation America

Organization mission the observer research foundation america orf america is an independent, non-partisan, and nonprofit organization in washington dc dedicated to addressing policy challenges facing the united states, india, and their…

International
5
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
6
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
7
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
8
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
9
Washington Office On Latin America

To advance human rights and social justice in the americas.

International
10
Middle East Media and Research Institute Inc

The middle east media research institute (memri) explores the middle east through its media, providing timely translations from arabic, farsi, urdu, pashtu, and turkish media and publishing original analysis of political, ideological,…

International
11
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
12
Mercy Corps

Our mission is to alleviate suffering, poverty and oppression by helping people build secure, productive and just communities.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Sister Communities of San Ramon Nicaragua. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
20/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $85,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEFAMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID: $80,000 · InternationalAMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AIDMIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $55,000 · InternationalMIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S ALLIANCEOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $50,000 · InternationalOXFAM-AMERICA INCMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $40,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INCSEEDS OF PEACE INC: $39,000 · InternationalSEEDS OF PEACE INCENGINEERS WITHOUT BORDERS-USAINC: $24,000 · InternationalENGINEERS WITHOUT BORDERS-USAINCUnitarian Universalist Service Committee Inc: $22,000 · InternationalUnitarian Universalist Service Committee IncMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC - DOCTORS WITHOUT: $50,000 · OtherMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES US…OXFAM-AMERICA INC - GENERAL DONATIONS ADDRESS: $30,000 · OtherOXFAM-AMERICA INC - GENERAL…FRIENDS OF OROKO VILLAGE: $25,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF OROKO VILLAGEWORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE: $18,000 · OtherWORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTI…BIKES NOT BOMBS INC: $16,000 · OtherBIKES NOT BOMBS INCBOLOKADA AND FRIENDS VILLAGE PROJECT INC: $13,000 · OtherBOLOKADA AND FRIENDS VILLAG…Washington Area Bicyclist Association: $16,000 · OtherWashington Area Bicyclist A…Unitarian Universalist Massachusetts Action Network Inc: $10,000 · OtherCENTER FOR NONVIOLENT SOLUTIONS INC: $8,000 · Other+3 more: $12,000 · Other+3 morePLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $40,000 · HealthPLANNED PAREN…THE VIRGINIA THURSTON HEALING GARDEN INC: $21,000 · HealthTHE VIRGINIA …METAVIVOR RESEARCH AND SUPPORT INC: $19,000 · HealthMETAVIVOR RES…THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $11,000 · HealthTHE MICHAEL J…MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $8,000 · HealthMUSCULAR DYST…JOY OF MUSIC PROGRAM INC: $40,000 · Arts & CultureMUSIC WORCESTER INC: $18,000 · Arts & CultureCENTER FOR MEDIA AND DEMOCRACY INC: $2,000 · Arts & CultureNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC: $30,000 · Civil RightsThe Lilies Foundation Inc: $29,000 · PhilanthropyAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $20,000 · Human Services
International$395,000Other$198,000Health$99,000Arts & Culture$60,000Civil Rights$30,000Philanthropy$29,000Human Services$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $85,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID: $80,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $55,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $40,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetJOY OF MUSIC PROGRAM INC: $40,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetSEEDS OF PEACE INC: $39,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe Lilies Foundation Inc: $29,000 over 7y, 9.3% of budgetENGINEERS WITHOUT BORDERS-USAINC: $24,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetUnitarian Universalist Service Committee Inc: $22,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE VIRGINIA THURSTON HEALING GARDEN INC: $21,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMETAVIVOR RESEARCH AND SUPPORT INC: $19,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMUSIC WORCESTER INC: $18,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetWORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE: $18,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBIKES NOT BOMBS INC: $16,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetWashington Area Bicyclist Association: $16,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $11,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUnitarian Universalist Massachusetts Action Network Inc: $10,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR NONVIOLENT SOLUTIONS INC: $8,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetSISTER COMMUNITIES OF SAN RAMON NICARAGUA: $6,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetPOLUS CENTER FOR SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR MEDIA AND DEMOCRACY INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID ↗
  • Who funds MIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds OXFAM-AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds JOY OF MUSIC PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds SEEDS OF PEACE INC ↗
  • Who funds NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds The Lilies Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds ENGINEERS WITHOUT BORDERS-USAINC ↗
  • Who funds Unitarian Universalist Service Committee Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE VIRGINIA THURSTON HEALING GARDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds METAVIVOR RESEARCH AND SUPPORT INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSIC WORCESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds BIKES NOT BOMBS INC ↗
  • Who funds Washington Area Bicyclist Association ↗
  • Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds Unitarian Universalist Massachusetts Action Network Inc ↗
  • Who funds MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR NONVIOLENT SOLUTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds SISTER COMMUNITIES OF SAN RAMON NICARAGUA ↗
  • Who funds POLUS CENTER FOR SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR MEDIA AND DEMOCRACY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Worcester Community Foundation IncMA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Worcester Community Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alice Rowan Swanson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alice Rowan Swanson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Worcester Polytechnic Institute: 8% of income from government
  • Music Worcester Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Bikes Not Bombs Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Joy of Music Program Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Alice Rowan Swanson’s filings →

More from the funding graph