Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Alice Oth Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$18k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$186kHealth$3k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$372k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IOWA WESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE$7,500
NEBRASKA METHODIST COLLEGE$4,000
Individual grant recipient$1,500
PURDUE UNIVERSITY$1,000
CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF IOWA COLLEGE OF NURSING$1,000
SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY$500
SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY$500
BOARD OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 91% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%GRAND CANYON UNIVERSITY: $1k → 11%COLLEGE OF SAINT MARY: $2k → 12%NEBRASKA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $5k → 13%WALDEN UNIVERSITY: $2k → 11%LUTHER COLLEGE: $2k → 10%IOWA WESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $12k → 12%WASHBURN UNIVERISTY: $2k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI - KANSAS CITY: $2k → 15%WESTERN GOVERNERS UNIVERSITY: $2k → 8%COLORADO TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY: $2k → 9%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $6k → 19%CHAMBERLAIN UNIVERSITY: $2k → 7%COLLEGE OF SAINT MARY: $2k → 12%NEBRASKA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $2k → 13%WALDEN UNIVERSITY: $1k → 11%IOWA WESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $9k → 12%WESTERN IOWA TECH COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $2k → 13%WASHBURN UNIVERISTY: $2k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI - KANSAS CITY: $2k → 15%WESTERN GOVERNERS UNIVERSITY: $2k → 8%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 19%CHAMBERLAIN UNIVERSITY: $2k → 7%COLLEGE OF SAINT MARY: $2k → 12%NEBRASKA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $2k → 13%IOWA WESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $8k → 12%WASHBURN UNIVERISTY: $2k → 14%WESTERN GOVERNERS UNIVERSITY: $2k → 8%COLLEGE OF SAINT MARY: $2k → 12%IOWA WESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $8k → 12%WASHBURN UNIVERISTY: $2k → 14%WESTERN GOVERNERS UNIVERSITY: $2k → 8%IOWA WESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $6k → 12%WESTERN GOVERNERS UNIVERSITY: $2k → 8%KAPLAN UNIVERSITY: $7k → 12%IOWA WESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $6k → 12%IOWA WESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $4k → 12%NEBRASKA METHODIST COLLEGE: $8k → 12%IOWA WESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $3k → 12%NEBRASKA METHODIST COLLEGE: $6k → 12%NEBRASKA METHODIST COLLEGE: $5k → 12%NEBRASKA METHODIST COLLEGE: $4k → 12%NEBRASKA METHODIST COLLEGE: $4k → 12%NEBRASKA METHODIST COLLEGE: $1k → 12%UNMC: $2k → 12%NEBRASKA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $3k → 12%CLARKSON COLLEGE: $1k → 12%CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY: $2k → 12%CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
SD
IA
IN
UT
CO
NE
MO
AZ
KS
AL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$169k · 17 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
9

Total granted

$169k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+9%

Still filing today

29%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NW
    NEBRASKA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2017–2021 · $12k · revenue +21%
  • CO
    COLLEGE OF SAINT MARY
    6× · 2017–2024 · $9k · revenue +67%
  • CU
    Creighton University
    3× · 2020–2025 · $4k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • KU
    KAPLAN UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2017 · $7k
  • WI
    WESTERN IOWA TECH COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
  • LC
    LUTHER COLLEGE
    one grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue +1%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
2
Clarke University of Dubuque Iowa

We are a Catholic, co-educational, liberal arts university founded in 1843 by the Sisters of Charity of the Blessed Virgin Mary in Dubuque, Iowa. Clarke educates students at the post-secondary level in the liberal arts and sciences, the…

Education
3
Loyola University

Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…

Education
4
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
5
Dordt University

As an institution of higher education committed to the reformed christian perspective, dordt university equips students, alumni, and the broader community to work effectively toward christ-centered renewal in all aspects of contemporary…

Education
6
Marquette University

As a Catholic, Jesuit university our mission is to search for truth, discover shareknowledge, foster personal professional excellence, promote a life of faith and developleadership expressed in service to others. See Schedule O.

Education
7
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
8
Union College

Union college is a seventh-day adventist community of higher education, inspired by jesus christ, and dedicated to empowering students to learn, serve, and lead.

Education
9
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
10
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
11
Walsh University Inc

Walsh university is an independent, coeducational catholic, liberal arts and sciences institution dedicated to educating its students to become leaders in service to others through a values-based education with an international perspective…

Education
12
LaGrange College

Education - lagrange college challenges the minds and inspires the souls of its students. founded in 1831 and committed to its relationship with the united methodist church and its wesleyan and liberal arts traditions, the college supports…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Briar Cliff University and the most unlike its peers is Clarkson College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

IOWA WESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE — $55,917 · OtherIOWA WESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGENEBRASKA METHODIST COLLEGE — $30,675 · OtherNEBRASKA METHODIST COLLEGETRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY — $12,300 · OtherTRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITYIndividual grant recipient — $7,940 · OtherIndividual grant recipientKAPLAN UNIVERSITY — $6,600 · Other+15 more — $33,153 · Other+15 moreNEBRASKA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY — $11,800 · EducationNEBRASKA WESLEYAN UNIVER…WGU CORPORATION — $10,810 · EducationWGU CORPORATIONCOLLEGE OF SAINT MARY — $8,940 · EducationCOLLEGE OF SAINT MARYCreighton University — $4,000 · EducationCreighton UniversityLUTHER COLLEGE — $2,000 · Education+4 more — $3,100 · Education+4 more
Other$146,585Education$40,650

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNEBRASKA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY — $11,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWGU CORPORATION — $10,810 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE OF SAINT MARY — $8,940 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCreighton University — $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHER COLLEGE — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetClarkson College — $1,378 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGrand Canyon University — $1,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRIAR CLIFF UNIVERSITY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPresentation College — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS UNIVERSITY — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEBRASKA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds WGU CORPORATION
  • Who funds COLLEGE OF SAINT MARY
  • Who funds Creighton University
  • Who funds LUTHER COLLEGE
  • Who funds Clarkson College
  • Who funds Grand Canyon University
  • Who funds BRIAR CLIFF UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Presentation College
  • Who funds ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Alice Oth Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph