Skip to content

· Private foundation

Alice G Hanson Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$91k
Granted FY2024still arriving
25
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$1.7MPhilanthropy$1.0MHuman Services$143kFood & Nutrition$66kEducation$62kHealth$45kInternational$12kArts & Culture$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k23 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $55k
$515
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Donors Fund$39,500
Chicago Center For Torah Chesed$15,000
Gemach Harabbonim$5,000
Chicago Chesed Fund$5,000
The Hebrew Theological College$5,000
The Shul Of Hollywood Hills$4,870
Gemach of Jackson$2,800
American Friends Of Mercaz Hatorah$2,500
American Friends of Yad EliezerB'ez$2,500
Congregation Kollel Zichron Binyami$2,500
L D Kesher Inc$1,800
Tomchei Shabbos Of Florida$1,800
JEMS Academy$515
Yad Chaya$365
Individual grant recipient$350
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $144k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Yad Chaya: $365 → 13%Chai4Ever: $1k → 11%Bikur Cholim of Lakewood: $1k → 11%Chai 4ever: $1k → 11%Gemach of Jackson: $6k → 11%Gemach of Jackson: $5k → 11%Gemach of Jackson: $3k → 11%Gemach of Jackson: $3k → 11%American Friends of Yad Eliezer: $2k → 11%Gemach of Jackson: $2k → 11%Gemach of Jackson: $2k → 11%Chicago Chesed Fund: $20k → 14%Chicago Chesed Fund: $20k → 14%Chicago Chesed Fund: $20k → 14%Bobbie's Place: $500 → 20%Chicago Chesed Fund: $15k → 14%Chicago Chesed Fund: $15k → 14%Chicago Chesed Fund: $10k → 14%Chicago Chesed Fund: $10k → 14%Chicago Chesed Fund: $5k → 14%Bikur Cholim Of Miami Beach: $1k → 15%Bikur Cholim Of Miami Beach: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
MO
MD
AZ
KS
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 63 repeat orgs$177k to everyone else

63 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 50 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

63
88

Total granted

$1.9M
$170k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+65%

Still filing today

35%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesReligionPhilanthropyHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MERCAZ HATORAH INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $263k · revenue +96%
  • CC
    CHICAGO CHESED FUND
    8× · 2017–2024 · $115k · revenue +87%
  • HH
    Helping Hands Food Ko Op Inc
    7× · 2017–2023 · $33k · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • CZ
    CONGREGATION ZICHRON MOSHE INC
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
  • KO
    KOLLEL OHEL TORAH AN ILLINOIS NOT FOR PROFIT CORPORATION
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • MT
    MISSOURI TORAH INSTITUTEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +25%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
2
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
3
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
4
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
5
Shaarei Halacha Inc
Philanthropy
6
Yeshiva Toras Chaim of Greater Miami Inc

To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.

Education
7
Chevras Shabbos Kodesh Podcast Fellowship
Religion
8
Gemilas Chesed Kramer Inc
Philanthropy
9
Congregation Beth-El Sephardic Center of Jamaica Estates

Congregation beth-el sephardic center of jamaica estates is a religious institution

Religion
10
Chabad Lametayel Inc

encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.

—
11
Chabad of Medellin Columbia Inc

Chabad of Medellin Columbia Inc is an organization dedicated to furthering the religious, educational, and charitable needs of the Jewish Community.

Religion
12
American Friends of Shviti Hashem Inc

To support and promote the study of torah (bible) among members of jewish faith worldwide.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshiva Elementary Inc; the most unlike its peers is Doresh Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 49 of the 166 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
21
Early backer (in before they grew)
47/49
Grantees still filing
38/49
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Chicago Center For Torah Chesed: $208,750 · OtherChicago Center For Torah ChesedAGUDATH ISRAEL OF WEST ROGERS PARK INC: $173,554 · OtherAGUDATH ISRAEL OF WEST ROGERS PARK INCGiving Fund: $142,000 · OtherGiving FundCONGREGATION OHR HACHAIM INC: $101,500 · OtherCONGREGATION OHR HACHAIM INCMIAMI BEACH COMMUNITY KOLLEL INC: $81,228 · OtherMIAMI BEACH COMMUNITY KOLLEL INCYeshiva Toras Chaim: $53,860 · OtherGEMACH HARABBONIM NFP: $49,000 · Other+121 more: $623,845 · Other+121 moreFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $845,300 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITAB…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MERCAZ HATORAH INC: $262,500 · EducationAMERICAN FRIE…Doresh Inc: $59,000 · EducationDoresh IncMESIVTA SHAAREI ADIRIM: $18,600 · EducationYESHIVA ELEMENTARY INC: $15,400 · Education+7 more: $33,950 · Education+7 moreNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR HEBREW DAY SCHOOLS: $200,000 · ReligionAGUDATH ISRAEL OF ILLINOIS: $10,540 · Religion+6 more: $21,963 · ReligionDONORS FUND INC: $171,500 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MESHI INC: $8,600 · Philanthropy+6 more: $14,390 · PhilanthropyCHICAGO CHESED FUND: $115,000 · Human ServicesGEMACH OF JACKSON INC: $20,400 · Human Services+6 more: $8,471 · Human ServicesHelping Hands Food Ko Op Inc: $32,617 · Food & NutritionTOMCHEI SHABBOS OF FLORIDA: $17,200 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,433,737Community Improvement$845,300Education$389,450Religion$232,503Philanthropy$194,490Human Services$143,871Food & Nutrition$49,817

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $845,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MERCAZ HATORAH INC: $262,500 over 8y, 8.3% of budgetDONORS FUND INC: $171,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCHICAGO CHESED FUND: $115,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetDoresh Inc: $59,000 over 4y, 23% of budgetHelping Hands Food Ko Op Inc: $32,617 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $29,700 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGEMACH OF JACKSON INC: $20,400 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetMESIVTA SHAAREI ADIRIM: $18,600 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTOMCHEI SHABBOS OF FLORIDA: $17,200 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetYESHIVA ELEMENTARY INC: $15,400 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetRABBI CHAIM KOWALSKY MEMORIAL AHAVAS YISRAEL FUND INC: $11,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAGUDATH ISRAEL OF ILLINOIS: $10,540 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MESHI INC: $8,600 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSCRANTON HEBREW DAY SCHOOL: $8,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetMESIFTA OF GREATER MIAMI-LOUIS: $7,600 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetBALTIMORE BIKUR CHOLIM INC: $7,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetSimchas Esther Hachnosas Kalla Fund INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetSHULAMITH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTORAS HAMISHPACHA TAHAREINU: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetYESHIVA OF MIAMI INC: $4,600 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE ALEPH INSTITUTE INC: $2,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC: $2,760 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS KICKING CANCER INC: $2,525 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAS NESIVOS AHRON C/O MICHAEL FRIEDMAN: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHESED OF LAKEWOOD INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $2,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIKUR CHOLIM OF MIAMI BEACH INC: $2,206 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCANDID: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI 4EVER INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYehudi Inc: $1,863 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKESHER LD INC KESHER: $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHEVRA SHAS AT TOWER FORTY ONE INC: $1,100 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $1,030 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALVIN S MINTZES HATZALAH OF BALTIMORE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIAMI JEWISH MONTESSORI INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHATZALAH CHICAGO: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBIKUR CHOLIM OF LAKEWOOD INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOUR PLACE INC: $550 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetZICHRON TZVI ELIMELECH: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOBBIES PLACE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAISH GLOBAL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYAD CHAYA INC: $365 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAIS YAAKOV ATERES MIRIAM: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MERCAZ HATORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL SOCIETY FOR HEBREW DAY SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds DONORS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO CHESED FUND ↗
  • Who funds Doresh Inc ↗
  • Who funds Helping Hands Food Ko Op Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHAI LIFELINE INC ↗
  • Who funds GEMACH OF JACKSON INC ↗
  • Who funds MESIVTA SHAAREI ADIRIM ↗
  • Who funds TOMCHEI SHABBOS OF FLORIDA ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA ELEMENTARY INC ↗
  • Who funds RABBI CHAIM KOWALSKY MEMORIAL AHAVAS YISRAEL FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds AGUDATH ISRAEL OF ILLINOIS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY44.7× affinity35 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Greater Miami Jewish Federation Inc · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Todd a and Raphaela Stern Family Foundation · Donors Fund Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · The Jmg Foundation · National Society for Hebrew Day Schools · The Harry G Rosenberg Foundation Inc · Aj & Sl Stern Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alice G Hanson Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alice G Hanson Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 170%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Chai 4EVER Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Yehudi Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Helping Hands Food Ko Op Inc: 0% of income from government
  • The Aleph Institute Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
17get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Alice G Hanson Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Alice G Hanson Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 166 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Alice G Hanson Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph