Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ali and Nihaya Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$85k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$65k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$210kEducation$19kHealth$7kInternational$5kFood & Nutrition$3kCivil Rights$2kEmployment$500Youth Development$250Other$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $65k
$1,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GRAND BLANC ISLAMIC CENTER$65,000
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN FLINT$5,500
SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA$1,500
ALSAC - ST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S HOSP$1,500
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS - USA$1,500
SAVE THE CHILDREN FEDERATION INC$1,500
DIRECT RELIEF$1,500
DONORSCHOOSEORG$1,500
ROOM TO READ$1,000
FOOD BANK OF EASTERN MICHIGAN$1,000
HENRY FORD HEALTH FOUNDATION$500
FOUNDATION FOR MOTT COMM COLLEGE$500
HURLEY FOUNDATION$500
KIDNEYCURE - AMERI SOC OF NEPHR$500
WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA: $2k → 11%ROOM TO READ: $1k → 10%DIRECT RELIEF: $2k → 14%DONORSCHOOSEORG: $2k → 17%KIDNEYCURE - AMERI SOC OF NEPHR: $500 → 14%MEMORIAL HEALHCARE FOUNDATION: $500 → 12%GRAND BLANC ISLAMIC CENTER: $65k → 16%ALTERNATIVES FOR GIRLS: $250 → 21%SAVE THE CHILDREN FEDERATION INC: $2k → 9%ALSAC - ST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S HOSP: $2k → 17%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS - USA: $2k → 17%AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPROLOGY: $250 → 14%MEMORIAL HEALHCARE FOUNDATION: $250 → 12%GRAND BLANC ISLAMIC CENTER: $20k → 16%HENRY FORD HEALTH FOUNDATION: $500 → 21%MEMORIAL HEALHCARE FOUNDATION: $250 → 12%GRAND BLANC ISLAMIC CENTER: $20k → 16%WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY: $500 → 21%MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $250 → 12%GRAND BLANC ISLAMIC CENTER: $20k → 16%WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY: $250 → 21%GRAND BLANC ISLAMIC CENTER: $20k → 16%WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY: $250 → 21%GRAND BLANC ISLAMIC CENTER: $20k → 16%WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY: $250 → 21%GRAND BLANC ISLAMIC CENTER: $19k → 16%WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY: $250 → 21%GRAND BLANC ISLAMIC CENTER: $16k → 16%WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY: $250 → 21%GRAND BLANC ISLAMIC CENTER: $10k → 16%FOOD BANK OF EASTERN MICHIGAN: $1k → 16%FLINT FOOD BANK: $650 → 16%HURLEY FOUNDATION: $500 → 16%FLINT FOOD BANK: $500 → 16%HURLEY FOUNDATION: $500 → 16%FLINT FOOD BANK: $500 → 16%FOUNDATION FOR MOTT COMM COLLEGE: $500 → 16%FOUNDATION FOR MOTT COMMUNITY COLLE: $250 → 16%HURLEY FOUNDATION: $250 → 16%FLINT FOOD BANK: $250 → 16%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN FLINT: $6k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN FLINT: $6k → 16%ARAB AMERICAN HERITAGE COUNCIL: $2k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN FLINT: $500 → 16%THE SYLVESTER BROOME EMPOWERMENT: $500 → 16%MCLAREN FLINT FOUNDATION: $450 → 16%UERM: $500 → 16%UERM: $500 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$232k · 9 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
3

Total granted

$232k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+60%

Still filing today

44%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationInternationalCivil RightsHealthCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GB
    GRAND BLANC ISLAMIC CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $210k
  • RO
    REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN
    7× · 2019–2025 · $12k
  • FF
    FLINT FOOD BANK
    4× · 2020–2023 · $2k

Funded once

  • AA
    ARAB AMERICAN HERITAGE COUNCIL
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • SB
    SYLVESTER BROOME EMPOWERMENT VILLAGEgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $500 · revenue +36%
  • AS
    American Society of Nephrologygraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $250 · revenue +60%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
2
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
3
Mclaren Northern Michigan Foundation

To receive and administer funds to support the mission of mclaren northern michigan and support programs that enhance the well-being of the community.

Health
4
Mclaren Northern Michigan

Mclaren health care, through its subsidiaries, will be the best value in health care as defined by quality outcomes and cost.

Health
5
Northern Michigan Hematology and Oncology

Provide professional services for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer and infectious disease and related conditions.

Health
6
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
7
Mclaren Port Huron

Mclaren healthcare, through its subsidiaries, will be the best value in healthcare as defined by quality outcomes and cost.

Health
8
Minnesota Council on Foundations

MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.

—
9
Mymichigan Health Foundation

The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes by conducting or supporting activites exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the…

Health
10
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
11
Mclaren Greater Lansing

Mclaren health care corporation, along with its subsidiaries, will be michigan's best value in healthcare as defined by quality outcomes and cost.

Health
12
Good Samaritan Foundation

Partnering for healing and a healthy future through philanthropy.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Memorial Healthcare Foundation; the most unlike its peers is American Society of Nephrology. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
6/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GRAND BLANC ISLAMIC CENTER: $210,000 · OtherGRAND BLANC ISLAMIC CENTERREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $12,400 · Other+9 more: $10,550 · OtherDONORSCHOOSEORG: $1,500 · EducationMEMORIAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $1,250 · EducationROOM TO READ: $1,000 · EducationFOUNDATION FOR MOTT COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $1,000 · EducationMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,500 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc: $1,500 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEF: $1,500 · InternationalHURLEY FOUNDATION: $1,500 · Civil RightsMCLAREN FLINT FOUNDATION: $1,200 · HealthFood Bank of Eastern Michigan: $1,000 · Food & NutritionSYLVESTER BROOME EMPOWERMENT VILLAGE: $500 · Community ImprovementALTERNATIVES FOR GIRLS: $250 · Housing & Shelter
Other$232,950Education$4,750International$4,500Civil Rights$1,500Health$1,200Food & Nutrition$1,000Community Improvement$500Housing & Shelter$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHURLEY FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $1,250 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMCLAREN FLINT FOUNDATION: $1,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFood Bank of Eastern Michigan: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROOM TO READ: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR MOTT COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $1,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSYLVESTER BROOME EMPOWERMENT VILLAGE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Society of Nephrology: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALTERNATIVES FOR GIRLS: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds HURLEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MCLAREN FLINT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Food Bank of Eastern Michigan ↗
  • Who funds ROOM TO READ ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR MOTT COMMUNITY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SYLVESTER BROOME EMPOWERMENT VILLAGE ↗
  • Who funds American Society of Nephrology ↗
  • Who funds ALTERNATIVES FOR GIRLS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ali and Nihaya Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ali and Nihaya Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ali and Nihaya Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Ali and Nihaya Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ali and Nihaya’s filings →

More from the funding graph