Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Alhentzen Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$22k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Community Improvement$103kRecreation & Sports$43kHuman Services$20kArts & Culture$18kEnvironment$11kYouth Development$10kHousing & Shelter$8kHealth$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$600
Median grant
3
States reached
$626k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN ATHLETICS$12,000
HAVENWOODS NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP$3,000
PETTIT NATIONAL ICE CENTER INC$2,500
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$2,000
HOPE CENTER$600
WOODMONT BAND BOOSTERS$500
GREEN BAY GLORY SOCCER CLUB$500
WBCA$500
CENTER ICE CLUB$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SILVER SPRING NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $5k → 17%SILVER SPRING NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $4k → 17%SILVER SPRING NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $2k → 17%SILVER SPRING NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $1k → 17%SILVER SPRING NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$199k · 22 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +7% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

22 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
10

Total granted

$199k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
0%

Still filing today

64%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Recreation & SportsArts & CultureHealthCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HN
    HAVENWOODS NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $103k · revenue +83% · 29% of their budget
  • PN
    PETTIT NATIONAL ICE CENTER INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $16k · revenue +39%
  • SILVER SPRING NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC
    5× · 2018–2023 · $13k · revenue +0%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN ATHLETIC DE
    one grant, 2019 · $8k
  • SC
    SERVICE CLUB OF MILWAUKEE INC
    one grant, 2018 · $500 · revenue -98%
  • U-
    UW -Eau Claire Men's Club Lacrosse
    one grant, 2023 · $500

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nonprofit Center of Milwaukee Inc

To promote interests and effectiveness of the nonprofit sector through strengthening organizational capacity, expanding volunteerism and encouraging collaboration.

2
Milwaukee Public Schools Admin and Supervisors Council Inc

Milwaukee public school administrators and supervisors council inc. was formed in 1971 to serve as the exclusive bargaining agent for its membership, via collection of dues as the primary source of revenue.

3
Milwaukee County War Memorial Inc

The war memorial center's mission is to honor the dead and serve the living. we commemorate the courageous men and women who made the ultimate sacrifice in defense of freedom while preserving and sharing the stories, experiences, and…

Arts & Culture
4
Milwaukee Ballet Company Inc

Milwaukee ballet transforms lives and connects communities through inspiring performance, community engagement, education and training.

Arts & Culture
5
Milwaukee Careers Cooperative

Milwaukee careers cooperative is a non profit employment agency that provides unique employment services, such as education, placement & transportation to assist individuals to obtain and maintain employment. milwaukee careers cooperative…

6
Milwaukee Community Service Corps Inc

The milwaukee community service corps (mcsc) is a non-profit vocational training organization providing employment, education and life skills to training youth adults and unemployed and underemployed of milwaukee, wisconsin.

Employment
7
Milwaukee Development Corporation

-instigate, implement, participate in and promote such activities as shall, in the judgment of mdc, tend to support the general community interest in a strong, vital, aesthetically exciting and economically viable greater milwaukee…

Community Improvement
8
Milwaukee Youth Symphony Orchestra Inc

Milwaukee youth symphony orchestra (myso) nurtures, challenges, and inspires young minds through music, profoundly changing their lives and our community for the better.

9
Metropolitan Milwaukee Association of Commerce

Improve metro milwaukee as a place to create jobs, invest capital and grow business.

10
Milwaukee Regional Medical Center Inc

The primary purpose of the medical center is to aid and support the development and provision of health services in wisconsin by assisting its members to develop and operate programs of education, research, and patient care. the medical…

Health
11
Milwaukee Economic Development Corporation

Medc provides gap financing to businesses in order to create employment opportunities and increase local incomes through the retention, expansion and development of manufacturing, service and other commercial establishments located in…

Community Improvement
12
Radio Milwaukee Inc

To reach a new generation of radio listeners on air, online and in the community with a compelling selection of music and public affairs programming. the corporation celebrates milwaukee music, arts, heritage, and culture by supporting and…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Milwaukee Art Museum Inc and the most unlike its peers is Muscular Dystrophy Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
10/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HAVENWOODS NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP INC — $103,000 · Community ImprovementHAVENWOODS NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP INCUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN ATHLETICS — $12,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN ATHLE…LYNX LAKE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION I — $8,000 · OtherLYNX LAKE CONSERVATION FOUNDA…MILWAUKEE RESCUE MISSION — $8,000 · OtherMILWAUKEE RESCUE MISSIONUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN ATHLETIC DE — $7,800 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN ATHLE…Hope Center Inc — $4,450 · OtherHope Center IncWISCONSIN SPEED SKATING ASSOCIATION INC — $4,200 · OtherWISCONSIN SPEED SKATING ASSOC…SCHLITZ AUDOBON NATURE CENTER — $3,000 · OtherOUR SPACE INC — $3,000 · Other+14 more — $8,120 · Other+14 morePETTIT NATIONAL ICE CENTER INC — $15,500 · Recreation & SportsPETTIT NA…NEXT DOOR FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 · Recreation & SportsNEXT DOOR…SPECIAL OLYMPICS WISCONSIN INC — $1,500 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL O…+1 more — $500 · Recreation & SportsMILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC — $7,300 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC — $5,500 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $3,000 · Arts & CultureSUMMERSTAGE OF DELAFIELD INC — $1,400 · Arts & CultureSILVER SPRING NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC — $13,000 · Human ServicesBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC — $9,400 · Youth DevelopmentAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $3,000 · HealthMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC — $250 · HealthWoodmont Band Boosters Inc — $500 · Education
Community Improvement$103,000Other$58,570Recreation & Sports$19,500Arts & Culture$17,200Human Services$13,000Youth Development$9,400Health$3,250Education$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHAVENWOODS NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP INC — $103,000 over 2y, 29% of budgetPETTIT NATIONAL ICE CENTER INC — $15,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSILVER SPRING NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC — $13,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC — $9,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC — $7,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC — $5,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHope Center Inc — $4,450 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOUR SPACE INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNEXT DOOR FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS WISCONSIN INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSERVICE CLUB OF MILWAUKEE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWoodmont Band Boosters Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNAMI GREATER MILWAUKEE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER ICE CLUB INC — $500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMILWAUKEE KICKERS SOCCER CLUB INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HAVENWOODS NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP INC
  • Who funds PETTIT NATIONAL ICE CENTER INC
  • Who funds SILVER SPRING NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC
  • Who funds Hope Center Inc
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds OUR SPACE INC
  • Who funds NEXT DOOR FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS WISCONSIN INC
  • Who funds SUMMERSTAGE OF DELAFIELD INC
  • Who funds SERVICE CLUB OF MILWAUKEE INC
  • Who funds Woodmont Band Boosters Inc
  • Who funds NAMI GREATER MILWAUKEE INC
  • Who funds CENTER ICE CLUB INC
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE KICKERS SOCCER CLUB INC
  • Who funds MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Milwaukee Foundation IncWI15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Alhentzen Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph