Loading…
· Private foundation
ALHENTZEN FAMILY FOUNDATION INC
This foundation does not accept unsolicited requests — it funds preselected organizations.
$22k
Granted FY2024
9
Grants
3
Communities
$12k
Largest
01What you fund
0168% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.
Community Improvement$103kRecreation & Sports$18kArts & Culture$17kHuman Services$13kEducation$500Other$73k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
milwaukeemuseum
2019
milwaukeegreatermuseum
2020
milwaukeemuseum
2021
—
2022
—
2023
lacrosseconservationicemilwaukeemuseumneighborhood
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 9 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k8 grants · $10k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$600
Median grant
3
States reached
$626k
Total assets
Largest grants
- UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN ATHLETICS$12,000
- HAVENWOODS NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP$3,000
- PETTIT NATIONAL ICE CENTER INC$2,500
- AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$2,000
- HOPE CENTER$600
- GREEN BAY GLORY SOCCER CLUB$500
- WOODMONT BAND BOOSTERS$500
- WBCA$500
- CENTER ICE CLUB$250
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$199k · 22 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +4% since the first grant, against -2% for the ones you funded once.
22 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
22
10
Total granted
$199k
$12k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+4%
-2%
Still filing today
50%
20%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Arts & CultureRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesEducationOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HNHAVENWOODS NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP2× · 2023–2024 · $103k · revenue +190% · 29% of their budget
- PNPETTIT NATIONAL ICE CENTER INC5× · 2019–2024 · $16k · revenue +2%
SILVER SPRING NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER5× · 2018–2023 · $13k · revenue +4%
Funded once
- UOUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN ATHLETIC DEone grant, 2019 · $8k
- LLLEUKEMIA LYMPHOMA SOCIETY OF WISCONone grant, 2019 · $500
- WBWest Bend East High Schoolone grant, 2020 · $500
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Milwaukee County Historical Society Inc
The milwaukee county historical society was founded in 1935 to collect, preserve, and make available materials relating to the history of the milwaukee community.
Arts & Culture
2
South Milwaukee Performing Arts Council
Support the south milwaukee performing arts center and community arts
Arts & Culture
3
Milwaukee Development Corporation
Regional economic development
Community Improvement
4
Madison Ice Inc
To provide ice skating facilities to individuals and organizations. offering organized activities to youth, disabled individuals and adults.
Recreation & Sports
5
The Park People of Milwaukee County Inc
The organization's mission is to strive to enhance and protect Milwaukee County Parks, their resources and facilities; to develope a wider public interest in and appreciation of the parks,open spaces and recreational facilities offered by…
Philanthropy
6
Radio Milwaukee Inc
Through music and stories created for a culturally open- minded community, radio milwaukee, inc. is a catalyst for creating a better, more inclusive, and engaged milwaukee.
Arts & Culture
7
Milwaukee Film Inc
To entertain, educate and engage our community through cinematic experiences.
Arts & Culture
8
Milwaukee Parks Foundation Inc
Engage our community in supporting milwaukee county parks to collectively steward a thriving park system.
Environment
9
Milwaukee Jazz Festival Inc
Arts & Culture
10
Milwaukee Careers Cooperative
Milwaukee careers cooperative is a non profit employment agency that provides unique employment services, such as education, placement & transportation to assist individuals to obtain and maintain employment. milwaukee careers cooperative…
—
11
Milwaukee Public Museum Endowment Fund
Supporting the charitable, scientific and educational purposes of the milwaukee public museum.
—
12
Metropolitan Milwaukee Association of
Advocate for business in the metropolitan milwaukee area
—
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nami Greater Milwaukee Inc and the most unlike its peers is Milwaukee Public Museum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
15 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
8/15
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Community Improvement$103,000Other$72,720Recreation & Sports$18,000Arts & Culture$17,200Human Services$13,000Education$500
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HAVENWOODS NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds PETTIT NATIONAL ICE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SILVER SPRING NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER ↗
- Who funds MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds HOPE CENTER ↗
- Who funds MILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
- Who funds OUR SPACE INC ↗
- Who funds NEXT DOOR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SUMMER STAGE OF DELAFIELD INC ↗
- Who funds Center Ice Club ↗
- Who funds NAMI GREATER MILWAUKEE ↗
- Who funds SERVICE CLUB OF MILWAUKEE ↗
- Who funds WOODMONT BAND BOOSTERS ↗
- Who funds MILWAUKEE KICKERS SOCCER CLUB ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Baird Foundation IncWI17.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Baird Foundation Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation ALHENTZEN FAMILY FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: HAVENWOODS NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
medium risk
~6 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.9× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 020590061 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on HAVENWOODS NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 6 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 29% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Alhentzen Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Alhentzen Family Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines