· Private foundation
Alfred and Kathleen Murabito Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $75k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DFW TRAINING CENTER | $20,000 |
| ST FRANCIS HOME OF THE FRANCISCAN | $20,000 |
| CORNERSTONE ATX CHURCH | $15,000 |
| BAY AREA DRAGONS WRESTLING CENTER | $10,000 |
| OUR LADY OF PEACE RETREAT HOUSE | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,000 |
| FOSTER VILLAGE INC | $2,500 |
| FRIENDS OF WRESTLING PREP | $2,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +68% since the first grant, against +58% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SFST FRANCIS HOME OF THE FRANCISCAN6× · 2019–2024 · $260k
- SHSACRED HEART CHURCH2× · 2018–2020 · $106k
- BABAY AREA DRAGONS WRESTLING CLUB2× · 2018–2019 · $63k
Funded once
- SCST CLARE'S RETREAT CENTERone grant, 2018 · $180k
- WIWRESTLERS IN BUSINESS NETWORKone grant, 2023 · $35k
- BWBEARS WRESTLING CLUBone grant, 2018 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Develop America's youth for Olympic Style wrestling
We are a sport for good non-profit primarily using the sport of wrestling to develop youth
The california regional training center also known as the cardinal wrestling club builds champions in wrestling and in life, expands access to the sport, and improves the communities it serves.
To provide full-time, year-round wrestling instruction for boys and girls of all ages and skill levels, with the aim of creating a safe and supportive environment focused on participation, skill development, and fun rather than solely on…
Punisher Wrestling is made up of community children parent support and volunteers. Our wrestling program was designed for the youth level because we believe wrestling builds character discipline and teaches children to set and achieve…
Teaching youth the sport of wrestling in an encouraging and competitive environment, arranging, organizing and hosting competitive youth wrestling matches, tournaments and clinics while encouraging youth to participate in such wrestling…
Nashville catholic youth wrestlings mission is to teach and promote amateur wrestling as a sport based on skill, determination, hard work and self-displine.
To develop the full potential of all of its members, on the mat, in the gym and in lifes arena.
Training of student athletes for wrestling in domestic and internaional competition.
Poway wrestling foundation is a youth wrestling club that emphasizes good sportsmanship, honesty, and respect.
The velva bulls wrestling club is dedicated to teaching the basic techniques of wrestling while keeping a fun, learning environment. our goal is to give every athlete the tools they need to become a better wrestler, student, and citizen.
to teach the sport of freestyle and folkstyle wrestling. we provide transportation to and from tournaments,uniforms,shoes and food during the tournaments.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Access Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bikes Because We Care. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BAY AREA DRAGONS WRESTLING CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE SAN FRANCISCO WRESTLING CLUB ↗
- Who funds TAR HEEL WRESTLING CLUB NC INC ↗
- Who funds MONTALVO ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds ACCESS CALIFORNIA SERVICES ↗
- Who funds FOSTER VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds Access Inc ↗
- Who funds MYOTONIC DYSTROPHY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BIKES BECAUSE WE CARE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Alfred and Kathleen Murabito Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.