Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Alfaretta Young Tua

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$56k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$56k
Largest
01What you fund
0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$135kHuman Services$74kArts & Culture$34kYouth Development$29kFood & Nutrition$19kHealth$11kEnvironment$6kHousing & Shelter$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$56,294
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Augustana College$56,294
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 56% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%BETHANY FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $8k → 12%BETHANY FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $6k → 12%BETHANY FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $6k → 12%BETHANY FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $5k → 12%FRIENDSHIP MANOR INC: $15k → 15%FRIENDSHIP MANOR INC: $12k → 15%FRIENDSHIP MANOR INC: $3k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$308k · 10 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
4

Total granted

$308k
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+54%

Still filing today

60%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    AUGUSTANA COLLEGE
    2× · 2024–2025 · $108k · revenue +10%
  • FM
    FRIENDSHIP MANOR INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $31k · revenue +20%
  • CT
    CITIZENS TO PRESERVE BLACK HAWK PARK FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2023 · $27k · revenue +185% · 41% of their budget

Funded once

  • FO
    Friends of Hauberg Civic Center Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $7k · revenue +54%
  • RI
    ROCK ISLAND COUNTY FOREST
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY - QUAD CITIES INC
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +13%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Illinois Presbyterian Home

Operate homes for the aged and to conduct charitable and benevolent enterprises

Human Services
2
Habitat for Humanity of Central Iowa Inc

Habitat for humanity of central iowa, inc. works in partnership with god and people everywhere, from all walks of life, to develop communities with god's people in need by building houses, so that there are decent houses in decent…

3
Habitat for Humanity of Minnesota Inc

Habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, community, and hope. through advocacy, collaboration, and leadership, hfh-mn advances the work of minnesota's habitat for humanity affiliates to create and preserve affordable…

4
Benton Habitat for Humanity

Benton habitat for humanity is a countywide ecumenical ministry that seeks to eliminate substandard housing and to make decent shelter a matter of action and conscience by having people from all income levels work together.

5
Habitat for Humanity of Prairie Lakes

To create decent and affordable housing for those in need and to make decent shelter a matter of conscience with people everywhere.

6
Habitat for Humanity of Isabella County

The goal of habitat for humanity of isabella county is to eliminate sub-standard housing in our county. out of our love for christ, we will reach this goal by providing safe, decent and affordable housing for low-income families in need.

7
Rockford Area Habitat for Humanity

To advocate on behalf of those in need of decent shelter by building and renovating affordable houses.

Housing & Shelter
8
Habitat for Humanity of Metro Denver Inc

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

9
Council Apartments Ii Inc

Provide high quality living and services to enable lower income older adult residents of the managed apartment buildings to flourish independently; and create inspiring programming to enable both residents and community seniors to maintain…

Housing & Shelter
10
Rockford University

To educate men & women to lead responsible lives by means of a curriculum grounded in liberal arts learning and complemented and extended by professional and practical experience, through the total academic and co-curricular experience,…

Education
11
Iowa Natural Heritage Foundation

This member-supported organization protects and restores iowa's land, water and wildlife for future generations. priorities include permanent land protection, promotion of improved land management and bringing new conservation…

Environment
12
Habitat for Humanity of Okaloosa County Inc

Okaloosa habitat for humanity is a non-profit, christian organization dedicated to eliminating substandard housing in okaloosa county. we provide opportunites for the community to show god's love in action. through partnership with people…

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bethany for Children & Families and the most unlike its peers is Citizens to Preserve Black Hawk Park Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ROCK ISLAND MILAN EDUCATION — $27,000 · OtherROCK ISLAND MILAN EDUCATIONCITIZENS TO PRESERVE BLACK HAWK PARK FOUNDATION — $27,000 · OtherCITIZENS TO PRESERVE BLACK HAWK PARK FOUNDATIONYOUTHHOPE — $23,500 · OtherYOUTHHOPEIndividual grant recipient — $19,508 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHRISTIAN CARE — $18,500 · OtherCHRISTIAN CARECOMMUNITY HEALTH CARE — $11,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY HEALTH CAREROCK ISLAND COUNTY FOREST — $6,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY - QUAD CITIES INC — $5,000 · OtherYOUTH HOPE — $5,000 · OtherAUGUSTANA COLLEGE — $107,631 · EducationAUGUSTANA COLLEGEFRIENDSHIP MANOR INC — $30,557 · Human ServicesFRIENDSHIP MANOR I…BETHANY FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES — $24,500 · Human ServicesBETHANY FOR CHILDR…RIVER BEND FOOD RESERVOIR — $18,500 · Food & NutritionFriends of Hauberg Civic Center Foundation — $6,742 · Arts & Culture
Other$142,508Education$107,631Human Services$55,057Food & Nutrition$18,500Arts & Culture$6,742

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAUGUSTANA COLLEGE — $107,631 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDSHIP MANOR INC — $30,557 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCITIZENS TO PRESERVE BLACK HAWK PARK FOUNDATION — $27,000 over 4y, 41% of budgetBETHANY FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES — $24,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTHHOPE — $23,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetRIVER BEND FOOD RESERVOIR — $18,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of Hauberg Civic Center Foundation — $6,742 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY - QUAD CITIES INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AUGUSTANA COLLEGE
  • Who funds FRIENDSHIP MANOR INC
  • Who funds CITIZENS TO PRESERVE BLACK HAWK PARK FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BETHANY FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES
  • Who funds YOUTHHOPE
  • Who funds RIVER BEND FOOD RESERVOIR
  • Who funds Friends of Hauberg Civic Center Foundation
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY - QUAD CITIES INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Rock Island Community FoundationIL15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Rock Island Community Foundation · Moline Foundation · Quad Cities Golf Classic Charitable Foundation · Quad Cities Community Foundation · Modern Woodmen of America · Rauch Family Foundation I Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Alfaretta Young Tua funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph