How much did ALEXANDER BERKELEY CARRINGTON JR & grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 90% of ALEXANDER BERKELEY CARRINGTON JR &’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

purchasingcopierbaseballdriveequipmentreimbursementbuilding

2020

websiteadditional purchaseclassroomtomexhibitionstrainingvan

2021

danpittsylvaniacancerbuilding

2022

roomdanville pittsylvaniaimprovementsimmediatefoodmake

2023

disorderssystemtechnologydanvillerehearsal hall

2024

educationaldanvillefoodrehearsal hall

2025

danvillefoodbuildingrehearsal hall

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k2 grants · $10k
$10k–50k15 grants · $360k
$50k–250k5 grants · $351k
$250k+1 grant · $397k

$25,000

Median grant

States reached

$25M

Total assets

Largest grants

SWEET BRIAR COLLEGE 54-0534105$397,486
HAMPDEN-SYDNEY COLLEGE 54-0505906$132,495
FUTURE OF THE PIEDMONT FOUNDATION 54-1842627$60,000
DANVILLE LIFE SAVING CREW 54-6056901$56,039
GOD'S STOREHOUSE INC 54-1444524$52,000
HOUSE OF HOPE INC 26-3994804$50,233
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH 54-0544703$44,165
SALVATION ARMY 58-0660607$44,165
DANVILLE SCIENCE CENTER INC 54-1776405$42,500
DANVILLE-PITTYSLVANIA COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY 54-1587929$40,000
AVERETT UNIVERSITY 54-0129860$30,000
DANVILLE COMMUNITY COLLEGE 54-1213521$25,000
DANVILLE-PITTSYLVANIA CANCER ASSOC INC 54-0634200$20,000
THE DANVILLE COMMUNITY ORCHESTRA 54-1644022$20,000
YMCA OF DANVILLE 54-0505982$20,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 17%. 14% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$6.2M · 52 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

52 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2025, 31 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$6.2M

$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%

+139%

Still filing today

23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationArts & CultureRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyHealthHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

HC
Hampden-Sydney College
2× · 2020–2021 · $214k · revenue +79%
AU
Averett University
3× · 2018–2021 · $100k · revenue +18%
DL
Danville Life Saving & First Aid Crew
2× · 2018–2020 · $81k · revenue +152%

Funded once

SB
Sweet Briar
one grant, 2018 · $295k
H
Hampden-Sydney
one grant, 2018 · $98k
DL
Danville Life Saving Crew Paid from Account #1302 EIN 54-6056901
one grant, 2022 · $51k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Davidson-Davie Community College

To provide scholarships and other forms of support for the students of davidson-davie community college.

—

Danville Regional Foundation

Philanthropy

Davidson College

Undergraduate liberal arts education

Education

Danville Area Community College

The foundation is committed to promoting and supporting the success of danville area community college through fundraising and stewardship of the foundation's resources, with the belief in the college's positive educational, cultural, and…

Education

Davenport University

Post-secondary educational institution preparing students for careers in business, health, and technology. quality, career-oriented academic programs are offered throughout the main campus in grand rapids and other campuses throughout…

Education

Danville Neighborhood Development

Reimagine danville's neighborhoods as thriving, nuturing, safe places where residents are empowered to invest their time, energy, and resources to make a positive difference.

Community Improvement

Danville Foundation for Industrial

The purpose of the foundation is to promote industrial growth and attract, retain, and expand jobs in vermilion county.

Community Improvement

Danville Area Training Center Inc

The organiation's purpose is to train individuals in pre-hospital emergency medical services so that the public can be served by proficient providers of advanced emergency medical care.

Public Safety & Disaster

D'youville University

D'youville university is a private university in buffalo, new york offering undergraduate, graduate, doctoral and continuing education programs primarily in health sciences, liberal arts and business. the university teaches its students to…

Education

Danville Public School Foundation Inc

Promote, aid and encourage educational purposes, activities and endeavors of every kind and description of and for or connected with the danville school district 118 of vermilion county il alone or in cooperation with governmental or other…

Philanthropy

Danville Library Foundation

To benefit the community by raising, managing, and distributing funds to enhance the services and collections of the danville public library and to increase public awareness of the library's needs and services.

—

Danville Concert Association Inc

Present musical concert performances to citizens of local community

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Danville Pittsylvania County and the most unlike its peers is Hampden-Sydney College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

14 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

13/14

Grantees still filing

8/14

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$6,662,133Education$337,247Recreation & Sports$141,000Arts & Culture$96,500Health$81,177Philanthropy$80,538Housing & Shelter$6,391

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jt-Minnie Maude Charitable TrustVA29.1× affinity11 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jt-Minnie Maude Charitable Trust · The Community Foundation of The · Danville Regional Foundation · Kiwanis Club of Danville Foundation · Hughes Memorial Home · Womack Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation ALEXANDER BERKELEY CARRINGTON JR & funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Danville-Pittsylvania County Chamber Foundation.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~20 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 270764226 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on Danville-Pittsylvania County Chamber Foundation, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 20 months of cash on hand.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 64% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Alexander Berkeley Carrington Jr &?

Find your warmest path to Alexander Berkeley Carrington Jr & through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

ALEXANDER BERKELEY CARRINGTON JR &

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

14 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Alexander Berkeley Carrington Jr &?

More from the funding graph

ALEXANDER BERKELEY CARRINGTON JR &

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

14 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Alexander Berkeley Carrington Jr &?

More from the funding graph