Skip to content

· Private foundation

Albert B Cutter Memorial Trust Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$35k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$49kHousing & Shelter$36kHealth$31kFood & Nutrition$23kYouth Development$18kHuman Services$16kRecreation & Sports$13kReligion$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$947k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAROLYN WYLIE CENTER$9,200
EASTER SEALS SOCIETY$4,000
WESLEY UMC PROJECT HOPE$2,000
FEEDING AMERICA-RIVERSIDESAN BERNANDINO$2,000
CARE CONNEXXUS$2,000
INLAND EMPIRE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,793
OPERATION SAFEHOUSE$1,500
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SAN DIEGO$1,500
ARC RIVERSIDE$1,200
PATH OF LIFE MINISTRIES$1,000
INSPIRE LIFE SKILLS TRAINING INC$1,000
SALVATION ARMY OF RIVERSIDE$1,000
BSA CALIFORNIA INLAND EMPIRE COUNCIL$1,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY RIVERSIDE$1,000
OUR LADY OF PERPETUAL HELP$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CARE CONNEXXUS: $2k → 11%CARE CONNEXXUS: $2k → 11%OPERATION SAFEHOUSE: $2k → 11%OPERATION SAFEHOUSE: $1k → 11%SAFE HOUSE OF THE DESERT: $3k → 11%SAFE HOUSE OF THE DESERT: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$188k · 27 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against -11% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
17

Total granted

$188k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
-11%

Still filing today

30%
6%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesReligionCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AR
    ARC RIVERSIDE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $14k · revenue +4%
  • IL
    Inspire Life Skills Training Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $7k · revenue +166%
  • PO
    PATH OF LIFE MINISTRIES
    4× · 2022–2025 · $5k · revenue +55%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $7k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $4k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Riverside Turning Point Inc
Youth Development
2
Rr Transitional Housing
Education
3
Riverside Community Housing Corp

Riverside community housing corporation (rchc) is a community based corporation which works to revitalize neighborhoods throughout riverside county by improving the quantity, quality, and condition of affordable housing opportunities…

Housing & Shelter
4
Families in Crisis Foundation

To provide housing placement services, crisis intervention, parenting education, counseling, independent living skills, referral resources for health and social services, after school and homework assistance for youth in riverside county.

—
5
Interval House

The mission of the organization is to ensure safety and stability for people who are battered, abused, homeless or at risk; to create public awareness about the epidemic of violence; and to mobilize the community to prevent violence and…

Human Services
6
Inland Southern California 211

Each year inland socal 211+ ("isc211") assists men, women and children in need. our services include: a helpline crisis & suicide intervention program, providing trained counseling 24 hours/7 days a week, a 211 riverside county program,…

Philanthropy
7
Vision for Life

To impact community housing

Housing & Shelter
8
Genesis Sober Living Inc

Provide residential recovery housing to those who are in recovery from drug and alcohol use and, in many cases, homeless

Health
9
Community Housing Options Integrated Community Employment & Social Services

Provide Independent Living Services for persons with developmental disabilities who want to live, work and socialize in the community. Including housing, assistance in entering the workforce, shopping, adult education and other community…

Human Services
10
Inland Temporary Homes

Aims to reduce countywide homelessness while addressing each family's personal struggle with perpetuating homelessness and poverty in their children. Provides both transitional shelter and rapid re-housing options in addition to…

—
11
Interim Inc

Interim, inc.'s mission is to provide services and affordable housing to supporting members of our community with mental illness in building productive and satisfying lives.

—
12
Abundant Life Recovery Housing Network

Abundant Life exists to provide recovery housing and recovery support services to individuals who are pursuing long-term recovery from substance use disorder

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Arc Riverside; the most unlike its peers is Inland Empire Community Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CAROLYN WYLIE CENTER: $43,000 · OtherCAROLYN WYLIE CENTEREASTER SEALS SOCIETY: $19,500 · OtherEASTER SEALS SOCIETYARC RIVERSIDE: $14,100 · OtherARC RIVERSIDESALVATION ARMY OF RIVERSIDE: $10,003 · OtherSALVATION ARMY OF RIVERSIDESUNSHINE SCHOOL & CENTER: $8,800 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $7,457 · OtherPATH OF LIFE: $7,025 · Other+31 more: $77,357 · Other+31 moreOPERATION SAFE HOUSE INC: $6,050 · Human ServicesCARE CONNEXXUS INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesInspire Life Skills Training Inc: $7,250 · HealthTEEN CHALLENGE OF SOUTH CALIF INC: $1,050 · HealthPATH OF LIFE MINISTRIES: $5,225 · ReligionJunior League of Riverside Inc: $4,150 · Community ImprovementInland Empire Community Foundation: $3,893 · Philanthropy
Other$187,242Human Services$10,050Health$8,300Religion$5,225Community Improvement$4,150Philanthropy$3,893

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetARC RIVERSIDE: $14,100 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetInspire Life Skills Training Inc: $7,250 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetOPERATION SAFE HOUSE INC: $6,050 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPATH OF LIFE MINISTRIES: $5,225 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJunior League of Riverside Inc: $4,150 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY RIVERSIDE INC: $4,150 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRIVERSIDE MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $4,150 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCARE CONNEXXUS INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetInland Empire Community Foundation: $3,893 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTEEN CHALLENGE OF SOUTH CALIF INC: $1,050 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ARC RIVERSIDE ↗
  • Who funds Inspire Life Skills Training Inc ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION SAFE HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds PATH OF LIFE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds Junior League of Riverside Inc ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY RIVERSIDE INC ↗
  • Who funds RIVERSIDE MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds CARE CONNEXXUS INC ↗
  • Who funds Inland Empire Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds TEEN CHALLENGE OF SOUTH CALIF INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Inland Empire Community FoundationCA17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Inland Empire Community Foundation · Inland Southern California United Way · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Albert B Cutter Memorial Trust Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Albert B Cutter Memorial Trust Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Albert B Cutter Memorial Trust Fund?

    Find your warmest path to Albert B Cutter Memorial Trust Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Albert B Cutter Memorial’s filings →

    More from the funding graph