Skip to content

· Private foundation

Albert and Suzanne Cinelli Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$16k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$68kHealth$16kArts & Culture$14kAnimals$13kEducation$7kHuman Services$6kCrime & Legal$2kPhilanthropy$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$190k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JOHNS EPISCOPAL CHURCH$7,500
THE BUTLER INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN AR$3,000
SIGHT FOR ALL UNITED INC$2,500
ST MATTHIAS$1,500
COZY CAT COTTAGE$1,375
THE BUMMER FUND$150
BELLA RUN EQUINE$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$123k · 16 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
6

Total granted

$123k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+17%

Still filing today

31%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsArts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BI
    BUTLER INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN ART
    8× · 2017–2025 · $11k · revenue +75%
  • SF
    SIGHT FOR ALL UNITED INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $9k · revenue +47%
  • OW
    OHIO WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2018–2020 · $2k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • RM
    RICHARD M ROSS MUSEUM OF ART
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
  • ER
    EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +17%
  • MM
    MCDONOUGH MUSEUM OF ART
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Helping Our Pets Everywhere

Animal protection and welfare.

Animals
2
One Planet Rescue

We are an all-age, all-breed, foster-based rescue organization aimed at helping cats and dogs from around the world, focusing especially on the United States where many lie in danger of euthanasia.

Animals
3
Freedom Tails Ohio

Animal Rescue

Animals
4
Save Ohio Pets

SAVE Ohio Pets is a non-profit whose mission is to reduce the homeless pet population in Central Ohio through community outreach and promoting spay/neuter, adoption, volunteering, and education. We operate a free, monthly vet care and…

Animals
5
Ohio Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The ohio society for the prevention of cruelty to animals works to prevent and stop cruelty to animals throughout ohio. our mission falls into three main areas: 1) intervention in cases of animal cruelty, 2) animal rehabilitation, and 3)…

—
6
Purebred Rescue Organization of Ohio Inc

Purebred Rescue Organization of Ohio has been rescuing, rehabilitating, and rehoming companion animals for over twenty years. What started as a small foster-based rescue in Dayton, focused on purebred puppy mill releases and owner…

Animals
7
Columbus Cares for Cats
—
8
Wyandot County Equine Rescue Inc

Prevention of suffering and cruelty to equines by operating a full-access rescue for all equines, providing assessment and training when needed as well as all vaccinations, farrier care, dental care, parasite treatment and veterinary care…

Animals
9
Tabby Tails Cat Rescue

To rescue cats in need provide them with necessary medical care and adopt them into forever homes.

Animals
10
Jet Wag Animal Rescue Inc

Our mission is to move adoptable dogs and cats primarily from heavily-burdened areas to loving homes. We work with trusted partners throughout the country and around the world and facilitate vet care, transport, and adoptions to help…

Animals
11
Barking Mad Animal Rescue

Rescue abused & abandoned dogs, urgent at risk of euthanasia dogs, medical needs & hospice dogs to provide veterinary care, rehabilitation, and find homes for dogs that become adoptable. Sanctuary til end of life is provided for those not…

Animals
12
Safe Animal Shelter of Orange Park

The mission of safe animal shelter is to provide a temporary safe haven for abused, abandoned, lost and unwanted cats and dogs until adopted into a permanent home, and to advocate spay/neuter as the only means to control animal…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Help Hotline Crisis Center; the most unlike its peers is Opera Western Reserve Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST JOHNS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $57,517 · OtherST JOHNS EPISCOPAL CHURCHSIGHT FOR ALL FOUNDATION: $5,500 · OtherSIGHT FOR ALL FOUNDATIONTHE BUMMER FUND: $5,250 · OtherTHE BUMMER FUNDST MATTHIAS: $4,718 · OtherSAINT MATTHIAS CHURCH: $4,652 · Other+9 more: $14,130 · Other+9 moreCOZY CAT COTTAGE ADOPTION CENTER: $5,500 · AnimalsCOZY CAT CO…Bella Run Equine: $3,800 · AnimalsBella Run E…Saddlebred Rescue Inc: $3,609 · AnimalsSaddlebred …BUTLER INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN ART: $10,800 · Arts & CultureBUTLER INS…OPERA Western Reserve Inc: $1,000 · Arts & CultureOPERA West…SIGHT FOR ALL UNITED INC: $8,500 · HealthOHIO WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $2,000 · EducationEPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $1,000 · Human Services
Other$91,767Animals$12,909Arts & Culture$11,800Health$8,500Education$2,000Human Services$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBUTLER INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN ART: $10,800 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSIGHT FOR ALL UNITED INC: $8,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetCOZY CAT COTTAGE ADOPTION CENTER: $5,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetBella Run Equine: $3,800 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetSaddlebred Rescue Inc: $3,609 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetOHIO WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERA Western Reserve Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHELP HOTLINE CRISIS CENTER: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BUTLER INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN ART ↗
  • Who funds SIGHT FOR ALL UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds COZY CAT COTTAGE ADOPTION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Bella Run Equine ↗
  • Who funds Saddlebred Rescue Inc ↗
  • Who funds OHIO WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds OPERA Western Reserve Inc ↗
  • Who funds HELP HOTLINE CRISIS CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Raymond John Wean FoundationOH13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Raymond John Wean Foundation · Community Foundation of the Mahoning Valley · Premier Bank Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Albert and Suzanne Cinelli Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Albert and Suzanne Cinelli Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Albert and Suzanne Cinelli Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Albert and Suzanne Cinelli Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Albert and Suzanne Cinelli’s filings →

    More from the funding graph