Skip to content

Massachusetts · Private foundation

Albert and Amelia Ferst Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$62k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
2
Grants FY2025
2
Organizations funded FY2024
0%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$57,500
Largest grant, FY2025
$57,500
Organizations funded a year
1 to 20
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$1.0M
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 0% of the organizations Albert and Amelia Ferst Charitable Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving2$62k0%
FY20242$59k0%
FY20233$58k0%
FY20224$65k0%
FY202110$60k30%
FY20201$57k0%
FY201912$47k25%
FY201820$56k40%
97% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$440kHuman Services$24kEducation$14kHealth$9kArts & Culture$7kReligion$6kFood & Nutrition$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 16 grantees

Plus 13 recipients with no EIN on record ($28k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Albert and Amelia Ferst Charitable Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAlbert & Amelia Ferst Operating Foundation: $435,591 over 9y, 6.6% of budgetFriends of Wilbraham Seniors Inc: $17,500 over 3y, 17% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Community Survival Center: $5,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetBoys & Girls Club of Greater Westfield Inc: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWounded Warrior Project Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOpen Pantry Community Services Inc: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCamp Sunshine at Sebago Lake Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSpringfield Rescue Mission: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWGBH Educational Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSpringfield College: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDakin Pioneer Valley Humane Society Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 12.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Western MassachusettsMA17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Western Massachusetts · The Antonacci Family Foundation for Charitable Giving Inc · The Beveridge Family Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Albert and Amelia Ferst Charitable Foundation with peer funders

About Albert and Amelia Ferst Charitable Foundation

How much does Albert and Amelia Ferst Charitable Foundation give?
Albert and Amelia Ferst Charitable Foundation reported 2 grants totaling $61,850 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 20 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Albert and Amelia Ferst Charitable Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Youth Development (85%), Human Services (5%), Education (3%).
Who are Albert and Amelia Ferst Charitable Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Albert & Amelia Ferst Operating Foundation ($436k), Friends of Wilbraham Seniors Inc ($18k), Hampden Wilbraham Regional School District ($9k).
Does Albert and Amelia Ferst Charitable Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Albert and Amelia Ferst Charitable Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Albert and Amelia Ferst Charitable Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Community Foundation of Western Massachusetts, The Antonacci Family Foundation for Charitable Giving Inc, The Beveridge Family Foundation.
Where is Albert and Amelia Ferst Charitable Foundation based?
Albert and Amelia Ferst Charitable Foundation is based in MA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Albert and Amelia Ferst’s filings →

More from the funding graph