· Private foundation
Albert a Alley Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k8 grants · $19k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $16k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PA DUTCH COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS | $16,482 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY | $6,000 |
| 6 PUBLIC CHARITIES 1000 EACH | $2,600 |
| PELICAN ISLAND AUTOBAHN SOCIETY | $2,500 |
| UNITED WAY OF LEBANON COUNTY | $2,500 |
| VIETNAM VETERANS OF AMERICA CHAPTER 542 | $2,000 |
| LEBANON LIONS FOUNDATION | $1,200 |
| MIKE SWISHER SCHOLARSHIP TRUST FUND | $1,000 |
| WELLSPAN GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your US giving — 89% of grant dollars ($169k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 11% that went abroad ($21k) is mapped below.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Beyond the US — 11% of all-years giving ($21k)
1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against +34% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HRHOPE RESCUE MISSION OF THE CITY OF READING2× · 2022–2023 · $17k · revenue +4%
- PIPELICAN ISLAND AUDUBON SOCIETY INC3× · 2022–2025 · $14k · revenue +49%
- OHOPPORTUNITY HOUSE2× · 2020–2021 · $10k · revenue +53%
Funded once
- PDPA DUTCH COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICAone grant, 2020 · $13k
- RCROTARY CLUB OF NAGUA CASINO DE LA COSTAone grant, 2022 · $10k
- JMJUBILEE MINISTRIESone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -7%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Wrf mission is to enable individuals around the world with functional limitations and participation restrictions to achieve community and social integration through physical and socioeconomic rehabilitation and advocacy; and to prevent…
The volunteer health program, ltd. (vhp) is a nonprofit health care program, which focuses on primary medical and surgical eye care to underserved rural areas in the dominican republic.
To empower lions clubs, volunteer, and partners to improve health and well-being, strengthen communities, and support those in need through humanitarian services and grants that impact lives globally, and encourage peace and international…
Our mission is to provide comprehensive eye health services, education, and support to underserved communities across africa and asia. we strive to: prevent blindness through early detection and treatment of eye diseases. improve access to…
The International Rescue Committee responds to the world's worst humanitarian crises and helps people whose lives and livelihoods are shattered by conflict and disaster to survive, recover, and gain control of their future.
To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.
Plant with purpose, a christian nonprofit organization, reverses deforestation and poverty around the world by transforming the lives of the rural poor. we do this through: - watershed restoration & regenerative agriculture - savings…
Guided by her remarkable legacy of its co-founder, helen keller, helen keller intl partners with communities that are striving to overcome longstanding cycles of poverty. by delivering the essential building blocks of good health, sound…
Curing and preventing blindness: haiti eye mission is the only eye care team that travels to certain regions of the island of hispaniola with annual mission trips to fight preventable and treat curable blindness. the team provides eye…
Rahma delivers emergency and development programs to needy communities, without discrimination based on gender, race, religion, or location. we aim to empower and develop individuals and communities affected by hardship globally.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Visioncorps and the most unlike its peers is Pelican Island Audubon Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HOPE RESCUE MISSION OF THE CITY OF READING ↗
- Who funds PELICAN ISLAND AUDUBON SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds OPPORTUNITY HOUSE ↗
- Who funds JUBILEE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds Raising Haiti Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF LEBANON COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD BLINDNESS OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds DEVELOPMENTAL & DISABILITY SERVICES OF LEBANON VALLEY ↗
- Who funds LEBANON LIONS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MISSIONS FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds VISIONCORPS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Albert a Alley Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Albert a Alley Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Albert a Alley Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.