Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Alan & Elaine Lichtenberg Foundatio

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$16k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
0178% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172025.

Health$48kFood & Nutrition$47kHuman Services$7kHousing & Shelter$3kEducation$2kCivil Rights$500Other$29k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$510k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$5,000
INTERFAITH NUTRITION NETWORK$5,000
HADASSAH$3,500
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%SUNRISE DAY CAMP: $3k → 7%SUNRISE DAY CAMP: $2k → 7%SUNRISE DAY CAMP: $2k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$109k · 11 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
17

Total granted

$109k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+70%

Still filing today

64%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationFood & NutritionCivil RightsHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TI
    THE INTERFAITH NUTRITION NETWORK INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $47k · revenue +79%
  • CH
    Children's Hospital Corporation
    8× · 2017–2025 · $28k · revenue +69%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    5× · 2017–2025 · $13k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • NN
    NAMI Nationalgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue +181%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
2
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
3
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
4
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
5
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
6
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
7
Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc

The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…

Science & Tech
8
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
9
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
10
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
11
Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary

THE MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY ("THE INFIRMARY") IS A NOT-FOR-PROFIT TEACHING HOSPITAL CONDUCTING PATIENT CARE AND RESEARCH. THE INFIRMARY IS A TEACHING HOSPITAL OF HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL AND AN INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH.…

Health
12
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sunrise Day Camps Association Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bob Mcintyre Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Children's Hospital Corporation — $27,500 · HealthChildren's Hospital CorporationAmerican Heart Association Inc — $13,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association IncNAMI National — $5,000 · HealthNAMI National+4 more — $2,750 · Health+4 moreTHE INTERFAITH NUTRITION NETWORK INC — $46,500 · Food & NutritionTHE INTERFAITH NUTRITION NETWORK INCHOPE LODGE CO ACS — $6,000 · OtherHOPE LODGE CO ACSHADASSAH — $3,500 · OtherHADASSAHIndividual grant recipient — $3,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipie…Individual grant recipient — $2,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipie…MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING — $2,500 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERINGMASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL — $2,500 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HO…CAMP SUNSHINE — $2,000 · OtherCAMP SUNSHINETHE RIVERS SCHOOL CORPORATION — $1,750 · OtherTHE RIVERS SCHOOL CORPOR…MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL DEVE — $1,500 · OtherRELAY FOR LIFE AMERICAN CANCER SOCI — $1,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $1,000 · Other+4 more — $2,000 · Other+4 moreSUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC — $6,500 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $500 · Human ServicesALI FORNEY CENTER INC — $2,500 · Housing & ShelterBELMONT HILL SCHOOL INC — $1,500 · EducationTHE FESSENDEN SCHOOL — $500 · EducationAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $500 · Civil Rights
Health$48,250Food & Nutrition$46,500Other$29,250Human Services$7,000Housing & Shelter$2,500Education$2,000Civil Rights$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE INTERFAITH NUTRITION NETWORK INC — $46,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation — $27,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $13,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC — $6,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI National — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALI FORNEY CENTER INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RIVERS SCHOOL CORPORATION — $1,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBELMONT HILL SCHOOL INC — $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEROES IN TRANSITION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FESSENDEN SCHOOL — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOB MCINTYRE FOUNDATION INC — $250 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE INTERFAITH NUTRITION NETWORK INC
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc
  • Who funds SUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds NAMI National
  • Who funds ALI FORNEY CENTER INC
  • Who funds THE RIVERS SCHOOL CORPORATION
  • Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY
  • Who funds BELMONT HILL SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
  • Who funds HEROES IN TRANSITION INC
  • Who funds THE FESSENDEN SCHOOL
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE
  • Who funds BOB MCINTYRE FOUNDATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA9.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Alan & Elaine Lichtenberg Foundatio funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Children's Hospital Corporation10% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc7% of income from government
  • Heroes in Transition Inc0% of income from government
  • The Fessenden School0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph