· Private foundation
Alan and Jodi Fox Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EMPTY BOWLS NAPLES | $2,500 |
| THE LAKES COMMUNITY CHURCH | $2,500 |
| HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK | $2,000 |
| FEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WISCONSIN | $2,000 |
| CELEBRATION BEACH CHURCH | $1,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| WAUPACA AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK SWFL | $1,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $500 |
| HUMANE SOCIETY OF NAPLES | $500 |
| HUMANE SOCIETY OF WAUPACA COUNTY | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +139% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
14 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
FEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WISCONSIN INC5× · 2020–2024 · $11k · revenue +56%
HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC5× · 2020–2024 · $10k · revenue +53%- EBEmpty Bowls of Naples Inc4× · 2021–2024 · $9k · revenue +139%
Funded once
- TRTHE RIVER FOOD PANTRY INCone grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +15%
- SHSECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF SOUTHERN WIone grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue -6%
- BIBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK OF SW FLORIDAone grant, 2020 · $1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To supply food to the under privileged.
To eliminate hunger by distributing food and household products to food pantries, community meal sites, and other programs serving low income people in 14 counties in west central wisconsin.
The food pantry serving waukesha county provides food, hope, and dignity to county residents in need, and advocates to increase awareness of hunger through community partnerships.
We provide food, household and personal items as available to combat food scarcity and poverty in our community.
Our vision is a hunger-free wisconsin and our mission is to help our food banks and partners fight hunger, improve health and strengthen local communities so that everybody in wisconsin has access to the food and benefits they need to…
Second harvest heartland's mission is to end hunger together. in partnership with more than 1,000 food shelves and hunger-relief programs in minnesota and western wisconsin, we provided 145 million meals to neighbors last year.
We gather and distribute food to relieve hunger and increase food security in west michigan and the upper peninsula. contributions and net assets consist primarily of donated food for distribution.
St. croix valley food bank, inc. (the "food bank") is a not-for-profit organization established in 2020 for the purpose of ending hunger in western wisconsin. the food bank operates a mobile pantry which serves rural areas without a food…
Hawaii foodbank, inc. is a nonprofit organization established to collect, warehouse and distribute salvageable food to social agencies that feed the needy of hawaii. the company is a certified member of feeding america, a nonprofit…
Hunger task force believes that every person has a right to healthy food obtained with dignity. we work to prevent hunger and malnutrition by providing food to people in need today and by promoting social policies to achieve a hunger free…
To engage, educate and lead worcester county in creating a hunger free community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Harry Chapin Food Bank of Southwest Florida Inc and the most unlike its peers is Weyauwega Arts Organization Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds Empty Bowls of Naples Inc ↗
- Who funds MEALS OF HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds PATTY BAKER HUMANE SOCIETY NAPLES INC ↗
- Who funds Humane Society of Waupaca County Inc ↗
- Who funds THE RIVER FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF SOUTHERN WI ↗
- Who funds TOTO FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF NEW ENGLAND INC ↗
- Who funds WEYAUWEGA ARTS ORGANIZATION INC ↗
- Who funds AGNESIAN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FOX CITIES CHAMBER FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Alan and Jodi Fox Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Alan and Jodi Fox Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Alan and Jodi Fox Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.