Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Al Hurvisadamm Education Foundation

TO PROVIDE SCHOLARSHIPS OPPORTUNITIES TO GRADUATING SENIORS BASED UPON COMMUNITY SERVICE AND ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT.

$107k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Education$270kPhilanthropy$76kRecreation & Sports$62kPublic Benefit$4kHealth$1kArts & Culture$1kMembership Benefit$350Employment$150Other$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $16k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$250
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NICOLET FOUNDATION$75,000
MILWAUKEE AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE$16,000
WAUKESHA COUNTY TECHNICAL COLLEGE$6,000
MILWAUKEE TENNIS AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION$5,200
ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION$1,250
WISCONSIN POLICY FORUM$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO$750
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TENNIS FOUNDATION$250
AMERICAN LEGION POST 449$250
MILWAUKEE COUNTY WAR MEMORIAL$250
MILWAUKEE AREA LABOR COUNCIL$150
MALAIKA EARLY LEARNING CENTER$150
Individual grant recipient$103
AMERICAN LEGION POST 27$100
MILWAUKEE COUNTY VETERANS ASSOCIATION$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SAN DIEGO VETERANS: $2k → 11%SCTA FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $500 → 14%WAUKESHA COUNTY TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $6k → 5%LAKE SHORE TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $2k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - SUPERIOR: $2k → 11%SUMMIT EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATION: $85k → 17%SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TENNIS FOUNDATION: $250 → 11%WAUKESHA COUNTY TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $2k → 5%SUMMIT EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATION: $50k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO: $750 → 11%WAUKESHA COUNTY TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $2k → 5%KIWANIS MILWAUKEE: $3k → 17%AMERICAN LEGION POST 449: $250 → 5%WAR MEMORIAL CENTER: $250 → 17%MILWAUKEE COUNTY WAR MEMORIAL: $250 → 17%ARCHODIOCESE OF MILWAUKEE: $103 → 17%WAR MEMORIAL CENTER: $100 → 17%NICOLET FOUNDATION: $75k → 17%MILWAUKEE TENNIS CLASSIC: $16k → 17%MILWAUKEE TENNIS AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%MILWAUKEE TENNIS CLASSIC: $5k → 17%MILWAUKEE TENNIS AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $2k → 17%MILWAUKEE TENNIS CLASSIC: $3k → 17%MILWAUKEE TENNIS AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $2k → 17%NICOLET FOUNDATION: $500 → 17%MILWAUKEE TENNIS AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%MILWAUKEE AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $16k → 17%MILWAUKEE AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $15k → 17%MILWAUKEE AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $13k → 17%MILWAUKEE AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $6k → 17%MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 17%MILWAUKEE TENNIS AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $22k → 17%MILWAUKEE ACADEMY OF SCIENCE: $1k → 17%MILWAUKEE TENNIS AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $6k → 17%WISCONSIN POLICY FORUM: $2k → 17%WISCONSIN POLICY FORUM: $1k → 17%WISCONSIN POLICY FORUM: $1k → 17%MILWAUKEE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $50k → 17%ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION: $1k → 17%UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND: $10k → 17%MILWAUKEE AREA LABOR COUNCIL: $150 → 17%MILWAUKEE ACADEMY OF SCIENCE: $8k → 17%MILWAUKEE COUNTY VETERANS ASSOCIATION: $100 → 17%MALAIKA EARLY LEARNING CENTER: $150 → 17%AMERICAN LEGION POST 27: $100 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$344k · 9 repeat orgs$75k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +124% since the first grant, against +78% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
9

Total granted

$344k
$72k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+124%
+78%

Still filing today

56%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’21’22’23’24
EducationPhilanthropyPublic BenefitArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MILWAUKEE TENNIS AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    6× · 2018–2024 · $38k · revenue +124%
  • THE MILWAUKEE SCIENCE EDUCATION CONSORTIUM INC
    2× · 2019–2021 · $9k · revenue +124%
  • WISCONSIN POLICY FORUM INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $4k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • MP
    MILWAUKEE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue +113%
  • UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +78%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mathematics Institute of Wisconsin Co Kathryn Leverenz
Education
2
Milwaukee Excellence Inc

The mission of the organization is to provide a high quality education for all students with choices after graduation that will provide financial stability, inspire personal freedom to builda legacy.

3
The University School of Milwaukee Corporation

University school of milwaukee cultivates excellence in learning, leadership, and citizenship for prekindergarten through 12th grade students. students are engaged, known, and valued within our passionate independent school community…

Education
4
Milwaukee Public Schools Admin and Supervisors Council Inc

Milwaukee public school administrators and supervisors council inc. was formed in 1971 to serve as the exclusive bargaining agent for its membership, via collection of dues as the primary source of revenue.

5
The Uwm Foundation Inc

The mission of the uwm foundation, inc. is to support the educational, literary, and scientific endeavors of the university of wisconsin-milwaukee by receiving, managing, and distributing gifts to benefit the university's students,…

Education
6
University of Wisconsin Foundation

To promote the welfare of and advance the objectives of the university of wisconsin-madison by encouraging the interest, engagement, and financial support of alumni, donors, and friends in the life of the university and with each other.

Education
7
Milwaukee School of Engineering

Milwaukee school of engineering (msoe) is a nonprofit, nonsectarian university providing a balanced education at the undergraduate and graduate level in the disciplines of engineering business, mathematics, and nursing. (see schedule o)…

Education
8
Milwaukee Institute of Art & Design Inc

The milwaukee institute of art and design's mission is to ignite curious minds through art, design and service. we value courage to seek our own path, integrity to pursue our lives and work with meaning, kindness to thoughtfully engage…

9
Michigan State University College of Law

The mission of the michigan state university college of law is to provide a rigorous educational program which prepares a diverse community of students to be national and international leaders in private legal practice, business and…

10
Milwaukee Math and Science Academy Inc

The mission of milwaukee math and science academy, inc. is to create a learning community in which:-teachers, parents and students work together to develop young people who are confident and achieve academic excellence in a powerful…

Education
11
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
12
Wisconsin Lutheran College Inc

Wisconsin lutheran college is a private, four-year liberal arts college.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Milwaukee Science Education Consortium Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hillsdale College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SUMMIT EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATION INC — $135,000 · OtherSUMMIT EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATION INCNICOLET FOUNDATION — $75,500 · OtherNICOLET FOUNDATIONMILWAUKEE AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE — $49,500 · OtherMILWAUKEE AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGEMILWAUKEE TENNIS AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $37,521 · OtherMILWAUKEE TENNIS AND EDUCATION FOUNDATIONMILWAUKEE TENNIS CLASSIC INC — $24,095 · OtherMILWAUKEE TENNIS CLASSIC INC+15 more — $22,870 · Other+15 moreMILWAUKEE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $50,000 · PhilanthropyMILWAUKEE PUB…UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC — $10,000 · EducationTHE MILWAUKEE SCIENCE EDUCATION CONSORTIUM INC — $8,500 · EducationMarquette University — $1,500 · Education+2 more — $650 · EducationWISCONSIN POLICY FORUM INC — $4,250 · Public BenefitMILWAUKEE COUNTY WAR MEMORIAL INC — $600 · Arts & Culture
Other$344,486Philanthropy$50,000Education$20,650Public Benefit$4,250Arts & Culture$600

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSUMMIT EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATION INC — $135,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetMILWAUKEE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetMILWAUKEE TENNIS AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $37,521 over 6y, 9.7% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MILWAUKEE SCIENCE EDUCATION CONSORTIUM INC — $8,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWISCONSIN POLICY FORUM INC — $4,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-SUPERIOR ALUMNI ASSOC — $1,500 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetMarquette University — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO — $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE COUNTY WAR MEMORIAL INC — $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMALAIKA EARLY LEARNING CENTER — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE AREA LABOR COUNCIL — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SUMMIT EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE TENNIS AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION
  • Who funds UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC
  • Who funds THE MILWAUKEE SCIENCE EDUCATION CONSORTIUM INC
  • Who funds WISCONSIN POLICY FORUM INC
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-SUPERIOR ALUMNI ASSOC
  • Who funds Marquette University
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE COUNTY WAR MEMORIAL INC
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE
  • Who funds MALAIKA EARLY LEARNING CENTER
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE AREA LABOR COUNCIL

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Herbert H Kohl Charities IncWI19.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Anon Charitable Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Al Hurvisadamm Education Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Al Hurvisadamm Education Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Al Hurvisadamm Education Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph