Skip to content

· Private foundation

Al Held Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.8M
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$2.8M
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$642kEducation$66kFood & Nutrition$20kInternational$10kSocial Science$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $68k
  • $250k+1 grant · $2.8M
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$9.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TENEDORA MUSEO DE ARTE MODERNO Y CONTEMPORANEO DE BILBAO$2,750,000
RIVER VALLEY ARTS COLLECTIVE INC$48,000
BARD COLLEGE$10,000
BROOKLYN RAIL INC$10,000
AAMC FOUNDATION$5,000
STEVEN MYRON HOLL FOUNDATION INC$5,000
NXTHVN$5,000
RESERVOIR FOOD PANTRY$5,000
BENNINGTON COLLEGE$4,100
NEW YORK FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 49% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 12%DAVIS MUSEUM AT WELLESLEY COLLEGE: $150k → 7%BARD COLLEGE: $10k → 9%RIVER VALLEY ARTS COLLECTIVE INC: $48k → 9%BOICEVILLE'S RESERVOIR FOOD PANTRY: $5k → 16%SKOWHEGAN SCHOOL OF PAINTING AND SCULPTURE INC: $10k → 17%THE BROOKLYN RAIL: $20k → 20%NXTHVN: $5k → 12%UNITED STATES ARTISTS INC: $100k → 14%BENNINGTON COLLEGE: $4k → 11%BARD COLLEGE: $10k → 9%RIVER VALLEY ARTS COLLECTIVE INC: $47k → 9%RESERVOIR FOOD PANTRY: $5k → 16%THE GRADUATE CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $16k → 17%THE BROOKLYN RAIL: $19k → 20%NXTHVN: $5k → 12%BENNINGTON COLLEGE: $4k → 11%BARD COLLEGE: $10k → 9%RIVER VALLEY ARTS COLLECTIVE INC: $40k → 9%RESERVOIR FOOD PANTRY: $5k → 16%THE GRADUATE CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $4k → 17%BROOKLYN RAIL INC: $10k → 20%NXTHVN: $5k → 12%BENNINGTON COLLEGE: $4k → 11%BARD COLLEGE: $10k → 9%RIVER VALLEY ARTS COLLECTIVE INC: $40k → 9%BOICEVILLE'S RESERVOIR FOOD PANTRY: $5k → 16%BROOKLYN RAIL INC: $10k → 20%NXTHVN: $5k → 12%RIVER VALLEY ARTS COLLECTIVE INC: $40k → 9%BOICEVILLE'S RESERVOIR FOOD PANTRY: $5k → 16%BROOKLYN RAIL INC: $5k → 20%NXTHVN: $5k → 12%RIVER VALLEY ARTS COLLECTIVE INC: $10k → 9%THE BROOKLYN RAIL: $5k → 20%BROOKLYN RAIL INC: $5k → 20%BROOKLYN RAIL INC: $5k → 20%AMERICAN ACADEMY IN ROME: $10k → 17%BROOKLYN RAIL INC: $5k → 20%STEVEN MYRON HOLL FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 17%STUDIO IN A SCHOOL ASSOCIATION: $25k → 17%STUDIO IN A SCHOOL ASSOCIATION: $15k → 17%STUDIO IN A SCHOOL ASSOCIATION: $10k → 17%GREY ART GALLERY NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $8k → 17%AAMC FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%AAMC FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%AAMC FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%AAMC FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%AAMC FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

16%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$558k · 13 repeat orgs$3.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +92% since the first grant, against +67% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
9

Total granted

$558k
$286k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+92%
+67%

Still filing today

85%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 3% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.8M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationFood & NutritionInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RV
    RIVER VALLEY ARTS COLLECTIVE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $225k · revenue +106% · 41% of their budget
  • TB
    THE BROOKLYN RAIL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $84k · revenue +277%
  • SI
    STUDIO IN A SCHOOL ASSOCIATION INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $50k · revenue +92%

Funded once

  • DM
    DAVIS MUSEUM AT WELLESLEY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2017 · $150k
  • United States Artists Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +67%
  • SS
    SKOWHEGAN SCHOOL OF PAINTING AND SCULPTURE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +144%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Neue Galerie New York
Arts & Culture
2
New York Academy of Art

The new york academy of art is a unique graduate school that combines intensive technical training in the fine arts with active critical discourse. we believe that rigorously trained artists are best able to realize their artistic vision.…

—
3
Berggruen Institute
Education
4
International Academy of Fine Art

The florence acadamy of art was founed in 1991 by daniel graves (see schedule o for details).

International
5
Munson-Williams-Proctor Arts Institute

Munson-williams-proctor arts institute (mwpai) is a fine arts center dedicated to serving diverse audiences by advancing the appreciation, understanding, and enjoyment of the arts. the art institute aims to promote interest and…

Arts & Culture
6
Museum of the City of New York

The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…

Arts & Culture
7
California Institute of Contemporary Art
—
8
Brooklyn Inst of Arts & Sciences Trust
Philanthropy
9
Clyfford Still Museum

Home to the art and legacy of the american painter clyfford still, we invite all to explore the potential of individual creative endeavor.

Arts & Culture
10
United Artist Collaborative
Arts & Culture
11
The Academy of Art University Foundation
Human Services
12
New Art Association
Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New York Foundation for the Arts Inc; the most unlike its peers is Steven Myron Holl Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TENEDORA MUSEO DE ARTE MODERNO Y CONTEMPORANEO DE BILBAO: $2,750,000 · OtherTENEDORA MUSEO DE ARTE MODERNO Y CONTEMPORANEO DE BILBAODAVIS MUSEUM AT WELLESLEY COLLEGE: $150,000 · Other+8 more: $92,150 · OtherRIVER VALLEY ARTS COLLECTIVE INC: $225,100 · Arts & CultureRIVER VALLEY ART…United States Artists Inc: $100,000 · Arts & CultureUnited States Ar…THE BROOKLYN RAIL INC: $83,500 · Arts & CultureTHE BROOKLYN RAI…THE AAMC FOUNDATION: $36,000 · Arts & CultureTHE AAMC FOUNDAT…NXTHVN INC: $25,000 · Arts & Culture+4 more: $41,000 · Arts & Culture+4 moreBARD COLLEGE: $40,000 · EducationBENNINGTON COLLEGE CORPORATION: $15,600 · EducationRESERVOIR FOOD PANTRY INC: $25,000 · Food & NutritionAMERICAN ACADEMY IN ROME: $10,000 · International
Other$2,992,150Arts & Culture$510,600Education$55,600Food & Nutrition$25,000International$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRIVER VALLEY ARTS COLLECTIVE INC: $225,100 over 6y, 41% of budgetUnited States Artists Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetTHE BROOKLYN RAIL INC: $83,500 over 9y, 2.7% of budgetSTUDIO IN A SCHOOL ASSOCIATION INC: $50,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetBARD COLLEGE: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AAMC FOUNDATION: $36,000 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetRESERVOIR FOOD PANTRY INC: $25,000 over 5y, 7.6% of budgetNXTHVN INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHE GRADUATE CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $24,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBENNINGTON COLLEGE CORPORATION: $15,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS INC: $15,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSTEVEN MYRON HOLL FOUNDATION INC: $14,000 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetSKOWHEGAN SCHOOL OF PAINTING AND SCULPTURE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY IN ROME: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBUFFALO FINE ARTS ACADEMY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RIVER VALLEY ARTS COLLECTIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds United States Artists Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE BROOKLYN RAIL INC ↗
  • Who funds STUDIO IN A SCHOOL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BARD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE AAMC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RESERVOIR FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds NXTHVN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GRADUATE CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BENNINGTON COLLEGE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds STEVEN MYRON HOLL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SKOWHEGAN SCHOOL OF PAINTING AND SCULPTURE INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ACADEMY IN ROME ↗
  • Who funds BUFFALO FINE ARTS ACADEMY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Helen Frankenthaler Foundation IncNY15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Helen Frankenthaler Foundation Inc · The Ford Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Al Held Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Al Held Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Nxthvn Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Bennington College Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Al Held Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Al Held Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Al Held’s filings →

More from the funding graph