Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Al Held Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$100k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$47k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Arts & Culture$642kEducation$66kFood & Nutrition$20kInternational$10kSocial Science$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $67k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RIVER VALLEY ARTS COLLECTIVE INC$47,100
BROOKLYN RAIL INC$10,000
BARD COLLEGE$10,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
AAMC FOUNDATION$5,000
NXTHVN$5,000
RESERVOIR FOOD PANTRY$5,000
BENNINGTON COLLEGE$4,000
NEW YORK FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS$4,000
STEVEN MYRON HOLL FOUNDATION INC$3,000
BUFFALO AKG ART MUSEUM$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 50% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 12%DAVIS MUSEUM AT WELLESLEY COLLEGE: $150k → 7%ASPEN INSTITUTE: $3k → 14%BARD COLLEGE: $10k → 9%RIVER VALLEY ARTS COLLECTIVE INC: $47k → 9%BUFFALO AKG ART MUSEUM: $2k → 13%RESERVOIR FOOD PANTRY: $5k → 16%SKOWHEGAN SCHOOL OF PAINTING AND SCULPTURE INC: $10k → 17%THE BROOKLYN RAIL: $20k → 20%NXTHVN: $5k → 12%UNITED STATES ARTISTS INC: $100k → 14%BENNINGTON COLLEGE: $4k → 11%BARD COLLEGE: $10k → 9%RIVER VALLEY ARTS COLLECTIVE INC: $40k → 9%BOICEVILLE'S RESERVOIR FOOD PANTRY: $5k → 16%THE GRADUATE CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $16k → 17%THE BROOKLYN RAIL: $19k → 20%NXTHVN: $5k → 12%BENNINGTON COLLEGE: $4k → 11%BARD COLLEGE: $10k → 9%RIVER VALLEY ARTS COLLECTIVE INC: $40k → 9%BOICEVILLE'S RESERVOIR FOOD PANTRY: $5k → 16%THE GRADUATE CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $4k → 17%BROOKLYN RAIL INC: $10k → 20%NXTHVN: $5k → 12%BENNINGTON COLLEGE: $4k → 11%RIVER VALLEY ARTS COLLECTIVE INC: $40k → 9%BOICEVILLE'S RESERVOIR FOOD PANTRY: $5k → 16%THE GRADUATE CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $4k → 17%BROOKLYN RAIL INC: $5k → 20%NXTHVN: $5k → 12%RIVER VALLEY ARTS COLLECTIVE INC: $10k → 9%NEW YORK FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS: $4k → 17%BROOKLYN RAIL INC: $5k → 20%NEW YORK FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS: $4k → 17%THE BROOKLYN RAIL: $5k → 20%NEW YORK FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS: $3k → 17%BROOKLYN RAIL INC: $5k → 20%AMERICAN ACADEMY IN ROME: $10k → 17%BROOKLYN RAIL INC: $5k → 20%STEVEN MYRON HOLL FOUNDATION INC: $3k → 17%STUDIO IN A SCHOOL ASSOCIATION: $25k → 17%STUDIO IN A SCHOOL ASSOCIATION: $15k → 17%STUDIO IN A SCHOOL ASSOCIATION: $10k → 17%GREY ART GALLERY NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $8k → 17%AAMC FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%AAMC FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%AAMC FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%AAMC FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$462k · 13 repeat orgs$286k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +92% since the first grant, against +67% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
7

Total granted

$462k
$279k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+92%
+67%

Still filing today

85%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationFood & NutritionInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RV
    RIVER VALLEY ARTS COLLECTIVE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $177k · revenue +106% · 41% of their budget
  • TB
    THE BROOKLYN RAIL INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $74k · revenue +277%
  • SI
    STUDIO IN A SCHOOL ASSOCIATION INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $50k · revenue +92%

Funded once

  • DM
    DAVIS MUSEUM AT WELLESLEY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2017 · $150k
  • United States Artists Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +67%
  • SS
    SKOWHEGAN SCHOOL OF PAINTING AND SCULPTURE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +144%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Neue Galerie New York
Arts & Culture
2
New York Academy of Art

The new york academy of art is a unique graduate school that combines intensive technical training in the fine arts with active critical discourse. we believe that rigorously trained artists are best able to realize their artistic vision.…

3
Berggruen Institute
Education
4
International Academy of Fine Art

The florence acadamy of art was founed in 1991 by daniel graves (see schedule o for details).

International
5
Munson-Williams-Proctor Arts Institute

Munson-williams-proctor arts institute (mwpai) is a fine arts center dedicated to serving diverse audiences by advancing the appreciation, understanding, and enjoyment of the arts. the art institute aims to promote interest and…

Arts & Culture
6
Museum of the City of New York

The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…

Arts & Culture
7
California Institute of Contemporary Art
8
Clyfford Still Museum

Home to the art and legacy of the american painter clyfford still, we invite all to explore the potential of individual creative endeavor.

Arts & Culture
9
Brooklyn Inst of Arts & Sciences Trust
Philanthropy
10
United Artist Collaborative
Arts & Culture
11
The Academy of Art University Foundation
Human Services
12
New Art Association
Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New York Foundation for the Arts Inc and the most unlike its peers is Steven Myron Holl Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

RIVER VALLEY ARTS COLLECTIVE INC — $177,100 · Arts & CultureRIVER VALLEY ARTS COLLECTIVE INCUnited States Artists Inc — $100,000 · Arts & CultureUnited States Artists IncTHE BROOKLYN RAIL INC — $73,500 · Arts & CultureTHE BROOKLYN RAIL INCTHE AAMC FOUNDATION — $31,000 · Arts & CultureTHE AAMC FOUNDATIONNXTHVN INC — $20,000 · Arts & Culture+4 more — $32,000 · Arts & Culture+4 moreDAVIS MUSEUM AT WELLESLEY COLLEGE — $150,000 · OtherDAVIS MUSEUM AT WELLESLEY COLLEGESTUDIO IN A SCHOOL ASSOCIATION INC — $50,000 · OtherSTUDIO IN A SCHOOL ASSOCIATION INCTHE GRADUATE CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $24,000 · OtherTHE GRADUATE CENTER FOUNDATION INC+6 more — $18,150 · Other+6 moreBARD COLLEGE — $30,000 · EducationBENNINGTON COLLEGE CORPORATION — $11,500 · EducationRESERVOIR FOOD PANTRY INC — $20,000 · Food & NutritionAMERICAN ACADEMY IN ROME — $10,000 · International
Arts & Culture$433,600Other$242,150Education$41,500Food & Nutrition$20,000International$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRIVER VALLEY ARTS COLLECTIVE INC — $177,100 over 5y, 41% of budgetUnited States Artists Inc — $100,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetTHE BROOKLYN RAIL INC — $73,500 over 8y, 2.7% of budgetSTUDIO IN A SCHOOL ASSOCIATION INC — $50,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE AAMC FOUNDATION — $31,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetBARD COLLEGE — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GRADUATE CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $24,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNXTHVN INC — $20,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetRESERVOIR FOOD PANTRY INC — $20,000 over 4y, 7.6% of budgetBENNINGTON COLLEGE CORPORATION — $11,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS INC — $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSKOWHEGAN SCHOOL OF PAINTING AND SCULPTURE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY IN ROME — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTEVEN MYRON HOLL FOUNDATION INC — $9,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetBUFFALO FINE ARTS ACADEMY — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Helen Frankenthaler Foundation IncNY15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Helen Frankenthaler Foundation Inc · The Ford Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Al Held Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Nxthvn Inc1% of income from government
  • Bennington College Corporation0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Al Held Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Al Held Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph