Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Al and Marcie Campbell Charitable F

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$25k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Human Services$40kEducation$23kHealth$18kPhilanthropy$15kYouth Development$7kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kAnimals$1kReligion$250Other$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$430k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BREMER COMMUNITY CENTER$10,000
MERRICK FOUNDATION$10,000
MERRICK MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$2,000
UCF FOUNDATION$1,060
UNIVERSITY OF NE FOUNDATION$1,000
HASTINGS PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$500
Individual grant recipient$300
MARQUETTE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$250
FAITH MOVING FORWARD$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LOVE OUR TANZANIA FAMILY: $4k → 16%LOVE OUR TANZANIA FAMILY: $3k → 16%LOVE OUR TANZANIA FAMILY: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$87k · 10 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
8

Total granted

$87k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+64%

Still filing today

80%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $550 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationRecreation & SportsHealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $11k · revenue +15%
  • MM
    Merrick Medical Center
    2× · 2020–2021 · $10k · revenue +57%
  • LO
    LOVE OUR TANZANIA FAMILY INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $9k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • CG
    CHARITABLE GIFT AMERICA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue +28%
  • JU
    Jacksonville Universitygraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +64%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
2
University of South Florida Foundation Inc

University of South Florida Foundation, Inc.'s mission is to provide charitable and educational aid to the University of South Florida; to promote education and other related activities of the University; and to encourage research,…

Education
3
University of Florida Health Corporation

UF Health's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across the spectrum of basic,…

4
Bryan Foundation

Bryan foundation's mission is to advance health, excellence in patient care, and health-related education through philanthropic support of bryan health and affiliates.

Health
5
Mercy Hospitalcedar Rapidsia Endowment Foundation Inc

Exclusively organized to foster, support, and encourage the mission and activites of mercy medical center.

Health
6
University of Iowa Facilities Corporation

The university of iowa facilities corporation acquires and holds property for the benefit and use of the university of iowa.

7
Miami University Foundation

Support of miami university

Education
8
University of Memphis Foundation

The foundation accepts, manages, and disburses private support to the university of memphis.

Education
9
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Children's Physicians

Children's physicians delivers the highest quality pediatric primary care while supporting education and research.

Health
11
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Meriter Foundation Inc

Meriter foundation exists to raise and manage gifts in support of the programs and services that advance the mission of meriter hospital, inc.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Merrick Medical Center Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Faith Moving Forward. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MERRICK FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · OtherMERRICK FOUNDATION INCMerrick Medical Center Foundation — $8,250 · OtherMerrick Medical Center FoundationMISCELLANEOUS CHARITIES — $6,600 · OtherMISCELLANEOUS CHARITIESHASTINGS PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $6,500 · OtherHASTINGS PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATIONMARQUETTE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT — $1,400 · Other+6 more — $3,400 · Other+6 moreBREMER COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $25,000 · Recreation & SportsBREMER COMMUNITY CENTER IN…UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $11,060 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL …CHARITABLE GIFT AMERICA INC — $5,000 · EducationCHARITABLE GIFT AMERIC…UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION — $4,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA…Jacksonville University — $1,000 · EducationMerrick Medical Center — $10,000 · HealthMerrick Me…LOVE OUR TANZANIA FAMILY INC — $8,500 · Human ServicesHOPE CENTER FOR KIDS INC — $6,000 · Youth Development4 PAWS 4 RESCUE — $500 · AnimalsFAITH MOVING FORWARD — $250 · Public Benefit
Other$36,150Recreation & Sports$25,000Education$21,060Health$10,000Human Services$8,500Youth Development$6,000Animals$500Public Benefit$250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBREMER COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $25,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $11,060 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMerrick Medical Center — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOVE OUR TANZANIA FAMILY INC — $8,500 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetMerrick Medical Center Foundation — $8,250 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetHASTINGS PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $6,500 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetHOPE CENTER FOR KIDS INC — $6,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCHARITABLE GIFT AMERICA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION — $4,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJacksonville University — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget4 PAWS 4 RESCUE — $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Al and Marcie Campbell Charitable F funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 3%
  • Jacksonville University3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Al and Marcie Campbell Charitable F?

Find your warmest path to Al and Marcie Campbell Charitable F through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph