Skip to content
Al and Marcie Campbell Charitable F at a glance

· Private foundation

Al and Marcie Campbell Charitable F

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$25k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Human Services$40kEducation$23kHealth$18kPhilanthropy$15kYouth Development$7kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kAnimals$1kReligion$250Other$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$430k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MERRICK FOUNDATION$10,000
BREMER COMMUNITY CENTER$10,000
MERRICK MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$2,000
UCF FOUNDATION$1,060
UNIVERSITY OF NE FOUNDATION$1,000
HASTINGS PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$500
Individual grant recipient$300
FAITH MOVING FORWARD$250
MARQUETTE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LOVE OUR TANZANIA FAMILY: $4k → 16%LOVE OUR TANZANIA FAMILY: $3k → 16%LOVE OUR TANZANIA FAMILY: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$87k · 10 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
8

Total granted

$87k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+64%

Still filing today

80%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $550 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationRecreation & SportsHealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $11k · revenue +15%
  • MM
    Merrick Medical Center
    2× · 2020–2021 · $10k · revenue +57%
  • LO
    LOVE OUR TANZANIA FAMILY INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $9k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • CG
    CHARITABLE GIFT AMERICA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue +28%
  • JU
    Jacksonville Universitygraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +64%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
2
University of South Florida Foundation Inc

University of South Florida Foundation, Inc.'s mission is to provide charitable and educational aid to the University of South Florida; to promote education and other related activities of the University; and to encourage research,…

Education
3
University of Florida Health Corporation

UF Health's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across the spectrum of basic,…

—
4
Bryan Foundation

Bryan foundation's mission is to advance health, excellence in patient care, and health-related education through philanthropic support of bryan health and affiliates.

Health
5
Mercy Hospitalcedar Rapidsia Endowment Foundation Inc

Exclusively organized to foster, support, and encourage the mission and activites of mercy medical center.

Health
6
University of Iowa Facilities Corporation

The university of iowa facilities corporation acquires and holds property for the benefit and use of the university of iowa.

—
7
Miami University Foundation

Support of miami university

Education
8
University of Memphis Foundation

The foundation accepts, manages, and disburses private support to the university of memphis.

Education
9
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Children's Physicians

Children's physicians delivers the highest quality pediatric primary care while supporting education and research.

Health
11
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Meriter Foundation Inc

Meriter foundation exists to raise and manage gifts in support of the programs and services that advance the mission of meriter hospital, inc.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Merrick Medical Center Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Faith Moving Forward. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MERRICK FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · OtherMERRICK FOUNDATION INCMerrick Medical Center Foundation: $8,250 · OtherMerrick Medical Center FoundationMISCELLANEOUS CHARITIES: $6,600 · OtherMISCELLANEOUS CHARITIESHASTINGS PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $6,500 · OtherHASTINGS PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATIONMARQUETTE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $1,400 · Other+6 more: $3,400 · Other+6 moreBREMER COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $25,000 · Recreation & SportsBREMER COMMUNITY CENTER IN…UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $11,060 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL …CHARITABLE GIFT AMERICA INC: $5,000 · EducationCHARITABLE GIFT AMERIC…UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $4,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA…Jacksonville University: $1,000 · EducationMerrick Medical Center: $10,000 · HealthMerrick Me…LOVE OUR TANZANIA FAMILY INC: $8,500 · Human ServicesHOPE CENTER FOR KIDS INC: $6,000 · Youth Development4 PAWS 4 RESCUE: $500 · AnimalsFAITH MOVING FORWARD: $250 · Public Benefit
Other$36,150Recreation & Sports$25,000Education$21,060Health$10,000Human Services$8,500Youth Development$6,000Animals$500Public Benefit$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBREMER COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $25,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $11,060 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMerrick Medical Center: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOVE OUR TANZANIA FAMILY INC: $8,500 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetMerrick Medical Center Foundation: $8,250 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetHASTINGS PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $6,500 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetHOPE CENTER FOR KIDS INC: $6,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCHARITABLE GIFT AMERICA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJacksonville University: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget4 PAWS 4 RESCUE: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFAITH MOVING FORWARD: $250 over 1y, 3.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Al and Marcie Campbell Charitable F funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Al and Marcie Campbell Charitable F. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Jacksonville University: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Al and Marcie Campbell Charitable F?

Find your warmest path to Al and Marcie Campbell Charitable F through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Al and Marcie Campbell Charitable F’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home