Skip to content

· Public charity

Aj Muste Foundation for Peace and Justice Inc

To provide resources and support to organizations that use nonviolent strategies to oppose war and promote justice; publishing and distributing educational materials about non-violence.

$284k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$33k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Civil Rights$998kPublic Benefit$123kHousing & Shelter$51kCommunity Improvement$10kEducation$7kEmployment$6k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $76,176, the rows itemized in this filing. The $284,091 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $207,915 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $43k
$7,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$19M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WAR RESISTERS LEAGUE$32,676
NEW YORK COMMUNITIES ORGANIZING FUND INC$10,000
MOVEMENT FOR JUSTICE IN EL BARRIO$7,500
ONE COMMUNITY UNITED$7,000
INTERFAITH PEACE-BUILDERS - EYEWITNESS$7,000
WESTERN REGIONAL ADVOCACY PROJECT$6,000
PHILLY BLACK WORKER PROJECT$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $38k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%WESTERN REGIONAL ADVOCACY PROJECT: $6k → 10%NYS Youth Leadership Council: $16k → 17%NYS Youth Leadership Council: $16k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $99k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$99k · 100% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: NONVIOLENCE ADVOCACY, RESETTLEMENT · NONVIOLENCE ADVOCACY

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$373k · 3 repeat orgs$267k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
2

Total granted

$373k
$224k

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $44k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCivil RightsHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementInternationalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WR
    WAR RESISTERS LEAGUE
    7× · 2018–2024 · $290k · revenue -1%
  • MC
    Met Council Research & Education Fund Inc
    2× · 2018–2019 · $51k · revenue +102%
  • NY
    NEW YORK STATE YOUTH LEADERSHIP COUNCIL INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $32k · revenue +135%

Funded once

  • CO
    CIRCLE OF REVOLUTIONARY NONVIOLENCE LTD
    one grant, 2022 · $209k
  • RA
    RISE AND RESIST INC
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Legal Advocacy Network Dba Glow

The National Legal Advocacy Network d/b/a Grassroots Law & Organizing for Workers is a legal non-profit organization dedicated to using legal strategies as a tool to build power for marginalized workers and create systemic change through…

Crime & Legal
2
Jews for Racial and Economic Justice Action Inc

Jews For Racial & Economic Justice Action (JFREJ Action or JFREJ) is the home for Jewish New Yorkers organizing with our neighbors and allies to transform New York from a playground for the wealthy few into a real democracy for all of us.…

—
3
Philadelphia Area Jobs With Justice

Building support for the rights of working people through coalitions of labor and community and through public education.

Employment
4
Mpac Nyc Inc

MPAC is a civil rights and activist organization committed to social and economic equality. The organization seeks to improve the lives of its congregants and the citizens of greater New York city through the mobilization of clergy and…

Civil Rights
5
Workers Center for Racial Just Nfp

The mission of the Workers Center For Racial Justice is to eliminate structural barriers to sustainable and living wage

Civil Rights
6
Metro Justice Inc

Educate and organize members in the greater Rochester area around social and economic issues facing local, national, and global community

Public Benefit
7
Long Island Jobs With Justice Inc

To support labor and community organizing in Long Island.

Employment
8
Jobs With Justice Education Fund

The organization serves as a coalition of labor organizations, community groups, faith-based organizations, and student groups dedicated to protecting the rights of working people. To this end, the corporation shall engage in organizing…

—
9
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
10
Worker Justice Center of New York Inc

Worker Justice Center of New York, Inc. (WJCNY) pusues juistice for those denied hian rights, with a focus on agricultural and other low-wage workers, through legal representation, community empowerment and advocacy for institutional…

Crime & Legal
11
Caaav Voice Inc

CAAAV Voice is a grassroot organization aiming to empower Asian immigrant communities by organizing against gentrification, tenant rights and promote social justice.

—
12
Interfaith Worker Justice

To advance the rights of workers by engaging diverse faith communities into action, from grassroots organizing to shaping policy at the local, state and national levels. They envision a nation where all workers enjoy the rights to:…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New York Communities Organizing Fund Inc; the most unlike its peers is Philly Black Worker Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
3/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WAR RESISTERS LEAGUE: $290,095 · OtherWAR RESISTERS LEAGUECIRCLE OF REVOLUTIONARY NONVIOLENCE LTD: $209,250 · OtherCIRCLE OF REVOLUTIONARY NONVIOLENCE LTD+1 more: $14,588 · OtherMet Council Research & Education Fund Inc: $50,947 · Housing & ShelterMet Counc…NEW YORK STATE YOUTH LEADERSHIP COUNCIL INC: $32,000 · Human ServicesWestern Regional Advocacy Project: $6,000 · Human ServicesMOVEMENT FOR JUSTICE IN EL BARRIO INC: $7,500 · Civil RightsPhilly Black Worker Project: $6,000 · Civil RightsNew York Communities Organizing Fund Inc: $10,000 · Community ImprovementINTERFAITH PEACE-BUILDERS: $7,000 · InternationalONE COMMUNITY UNITED: $7,000 · Education
Other$513,933Housing & Shelter$50,947Human Services$38,000Civil Rights$13,500Community Improvement$10,000International$7,000Education$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWAR RESISTERS LEAGUE: $290,095 over 7y, 16% of budgetNEW YORK STATE YOUTH LEADERSHIP COUNCIL INC: $32,000 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetNew York Communities Organizing Fund Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMOVEMENT FOR JUSTICE IN EL BARRIO INC: $7,500 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetINTERFAITH PEACE-BUILDERS: $7,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetONE COMMUNITY UNITED: $7,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetWestern Regional Advocacy Project: $6,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetPhilly Black Worker Project: $6,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amalgamated Charitable Foundation IncDC18.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · North Star Fund Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Aj Muste Foundation for Peace and Justice Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Aj Muste Foundation for Peace and Justice Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Aj Muste Foundation for Peace and Justice Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Aj Muste Foundation for Peace and Justice Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Aj Muste Foundation for Peace and Justice’s filings →

    More from the funding graph