Skip to content
AIDS Service Foundation of Greater Kansas City at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

AIDS Service Foundation of Greater Kansas City

Aids/hiv advocacy fundraising for kansas city area organizations which provide care to people with hiv/aids

$111k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$1.1MHousing & Shelter$353kCrime & Legal$10k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $85k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$266k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAVE INC$15,000
HOPE CARE CENTER$15,000
KANSAS CITY CARE CLINIC$15,000
CALVARY COMMUNITY OUTREACH NETWORK$10,000
CONFLUENCE HRKC$10,000
VIVENT HEALTH$10,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$10,000
RESTART INC$9,700
SHEFFIELD PLACE$8,650
ARTISTS HELPING THE HOMELESS$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ARTISTS HELPING THE HOMELESS: $8k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 9 repeat orgs$37k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
4

Total granted

$1.4M
$37k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+44%

Still filing today

89%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $37k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’25
HealthHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GS
    GOOD SAMARITAN PROJECT INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $345k · revenue +18%
  • SI
    SAVE INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $310k · revenue +29%
  • HC
    HOPE CARE CENTER INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $310k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • VIVENT HEALTH INC
    one grant, 2025 · $10k · revenue 0%
  • CH
    CONFLUENCE HRKC
    one grant, 2025 · $10k
  • RI
    RESTART INCgraduated
    one grant, 2025 · $10k · revenue +44%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chicago House & Social Service Agency

Provides housing and support services to individuals and families impacted by hiv/aids

Health
2
Swope Health Services

Swope health services (swope health) improves the health and wellness of the community by delivering accessible, quality, comprehensive patient care.

Health
3
Northern Nevada Hiv Outpatient Program Education and Services

Northern Nevada Hopes provides affordable, high-quality, medical, behavioral health, and support services for all. We are dedicated to building a healthier community by providing coordinated care and support for individuals and family…

Health
4
Greater Kansas City Coalition to End Homelessness

This organization is committed to community networking and coalition building to help eradicate homelessness in the Greater Kansas City metro area. The organization was formed to address the concerns and interests of the homeless…

Housing & Shelter
5
Health Care for the Homeless Inc

Health care for the homeless works to end homelessness through racially equitable health care, housing and advocacy in partnership with those of us who have experienced it.

—
6
Hope Family Care Center Llc

Hope family care center's mission is to honor god by establishing and operating a health clinic that provides compassionate, high-quality, whole-person care to individuals and families in east kansas city who have had the hardest time…

Health
7
Priority Health Care Inc

Priority health care, inc. is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization located on the west bank of jefferson parish, formed in august 2009. the mission is to provide holistic health care to underserved communities that empower people to live…

Health
8
Aids Services of Austin Inc

Vision: vivent health envisions an end to the hiv/aids epidemic.mission: to end hiv/aids by providing integrated, personalized, judgment-free healthcare, social services, and effective prevention strategies.

Health
9
Siouxland Community Health Center

Inspiring and empowering our community through health equity for all.

Health
10
Regional Health Care Clinic Inc

Quality care + meaningful partnerships = healthy communities

Health
11
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services
12
Welcome House Inc

The Welcome House is a non-profit, sober living, recovery program (incorporated in 1971) with the sole purpose of educating and rehabilitating the adult male alcoholic/ addict and the expressed mission of returning the individual to…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kansas City Care Clinic; the most unlike its peers is Calvary Community Outreach Network. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GOOD SAMARITAN PROJECT INC: $345,000 · HealthGOOD SAMARITAN PROJECT INCHOPE CARE CENTER INC: $310,000 · HealthHOPE CARE CENTER INCPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS: $30,000 · Health+3 more: $39,680 · Health+3 moreSAVE INC: $310,000 · OtherSAVE INCKansas City CARE Clinic: $310,000 · OtherKansas City CARE ClinicCALVARY COMMUNITY OUTREACH NETWORK: $50,620 · Crime & LegalTHE COTERIE INC: $42,000 · Arts & CultureSHEFFIELD PLACE: $25,480 · Housing & ShelterRESTART INC: $9,700 · Housing & ShelterARTISTS HELPING THE HOMELESS INC: $7,500 · Human Services
Health$724,680Other$620,000Crime & Legal$50,620Arts & Culture$42,000Housing & Shelter$35,180Human Services$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGOOD SAMARITAN PROJECT INC: $345,000 over 5y, 4.6% of budgetSAVE INC: $310,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetHOPE CARE CENTER INC: $310,000 over 6y, 3.8% of budgetKansas City CARE Clinic: $310,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetCALVARY COMMUNITY OUTREACH NETWORK: $50,620 over 6y, 5.7% of budgetTHE COTERIE INC: $42,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSHEFFIELD PLACE: $25,480 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetSaint Lukes Foundation: $19,680 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVIVENT HEALTH INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Health Forward Founda…United Way of Greater…Greater Kansas City C…Menorah Heritage Foun…Victor E Speas Founda…Oppenstein Brothers F…The H & R Block Found…Marion and Henry Bloc…Jackson County Commun…The Kansas City Royal…William T Kemper Foun…Hallmark Corporate Fo…
Health Forward FoundationMO21.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Health Forward Foundation · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Menorah Heritage Foundation · Victor E Speas Foundation · Oppenstein Brothers Foundation · The H & R Block Foundation · Marion and Henry Bloch Family Foundation · Jackson County Community Children's Services Fund · The Kansas City Royals Foundation · William T Kemper Foundation Commerce Bank Trustee · Hallmark Corporate Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization AIDS Service Foundation of Greater Kansas City funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from AIDS Service Foundation of Greater Kansas City. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on AIDS Service Foundation of Greater Kansas City’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home