Skip to content
Agrawal Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Agrawal Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$128k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$201kArts & Culture$179kHuman Services$56kPhilanthropy$55kSocial Science$36kInternational$30kReligion$19kHealth$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$2,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DECHOMAI FOUNDATION$50,000
HINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION$25,000
EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION$24,000
AMERICAN MEDITATION INSTITUTE$20,795
HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL$5,000
OFFICE OF GENERAL SERVICES$2,000
FESTIVAL OF NATIONS$600
WHMS FUND$500
ADAM R SCRIPPS FOUNDATION$250
HINDU CULTURAL CENTER$125
RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–21, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION: $500 → 17%THE BABY INSTITUTE: $900 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
IA
OH
NJ
CA
KY
TN
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$428k · 18 repeat orgs$138k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +3% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
30

Total granted

$428k
$113k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
-1%

Still filing today

56%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
    6× · 2019–2025 · $70k · revenue +13%
  • WH
    WOODLAND HILL MONTESSORI SCHOOL
    4× · 2018–2021 · $43k · revenue +57%
  • CR
    CAPITAL ROOTS INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $11k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • IA
    INDO AMERICAN COMMUNITY OF WEST ROCKAWAY
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • TI
    TEXAS INDIA FORUM
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • UI
    US INDIAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rhode Island Quality Institute

To represent every constituency of healthcare leadership, as well as health insurance, consumer and public interest. to work collaboratively, come up with innovative solutions, champion changes throughout our organizations, and dedicate…

Health
2
The American India Foundation

The american india foundation(aif) is a nonprofit american development organization that is devoted to accelerating social and economic change in india.

Public Safety & Disaster
3
India Development and Relief Fund Inc

Provide social development and relief assistance to underprivileged people primarily in india but also in nepal, sri lanka and the usa

International
4
Iit Research Institute

Perform basic research and preclinical efficacy assessments of new molecular entities being developed for the prevention and treatment of cancer and infectious disease. Discover new pathways and targets for the design and development of…

Science & Tech
5
American Inst of Indian Studies

Dedicated to the advancement of knowledge about india and the promotion of intellectual engagement with india in american universities by providing research fellowship support, training in indian languages, knowledge of indian culture, and…

Social Science
6
Cancer Research Institute Inc

See schedule ocri is a nonprofit organization dedicated to advancing cancer immunotherapy through scientific discovery and global collaboration. since 1953, cri has funded research that deepens understanding of the immune system and its…

Health
7
The Scripps Research Institute

The scripps research institute ("tsri") performs high impact basic biomedical research, improves the human condition by fostering translation of its discoveries into useful products and engages in the highest quality graduate scientific…

Health
8
Institute for Protein Innovation Inc

The institute for protein innovation is advancing protein science to accelerate research and improve human health.

Health
9
Student Senate of the State University of New York At Delhi

Student senate is comprised of various clubs carrying on student and academic activities at the state university of new york at delhi (suny delhi). these activities are financed, in part, from mandatory fees levied each semester on…

Education
10
Binaytara Foundation

To improve access to cutting-edge cancer care and minimize cancer health disparities in the united states and around the world.

International
11
Us-India Policy Institute

Us-india policy institute (usipi)undertaking policy research on diversity and inclusive developments in india and the usa. usipis vision for equal access to freedom,justice, and opportunity in india rests on its three pillars; research &…

Arts & Culture
12
Indiaspora

Transforming the success of the indian diaspora into meaningful impact worldwide.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Albany Academies Inc; the most unlike its peers is Festival of Nations Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/35
Grantees still filing
19/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INDO AMERICAN COMMUNITY OF WEST ROCKAWAY: $50,000 · OtherINDO AMERICAN COMMUNITY OF WEST ROCKAWAYIIT BHU FOUNDATION INC: $42,622 · OtherIIT BHU FOUNDATION INCHARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL: $36,101 · OtherHARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOLEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION: $32,400 · OtherEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATIONTEXAS INDIA FORUM: $25,000 · OtherTEXAS INDIA FORUMHINDU TEMPLE SOCIETY: $18,736 · OtherHINDU TEMPLE SOCIETY+21 more: $30,485 · Other+21 moreTHE AMERICAN MEDITATION INSTITUTE INC: $144,045 · Arts & CultureTHE AMERICAN MEDITATION INSTITUT…HINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureHINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC+3 more: $8,475 · Arts & CultureRensselaer Polytechnic Institute: $70,100 · EducationRensselaer Polytechnic …WOODLAND HILL MONTESSORI SCHOOL: $42,700 · EducationWOODLAND HILL MONTESSOR…ITBHU GLOBAL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC: $10,500 · EducationITBHU GLOBAL ALUMNI ASS…+2 more: $2,001 · EducationDECHOMAI FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · PhilanthropyDECHOMAI …+2 more: $1,750 · PhilanthropyCAPITAL ROOTS INC: $10,700 · Environment+1 more: $250 · EnvironmentTREEN CHARITABLE EVENTS INC: $5,000 · HealthCENTER FOR DISABILITY SERVICESINC: $1,500 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $1,500 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,000 · HealthMIRANDA CHARITY CORP: $500 · Health+2 more: $162 · HealthAKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA): $5,000 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $100 · Food & Nutrition
Other$235,344Arts & Culture$177,520Education$125,301Philanthropy$51,750Environment$10,950Health$9,662Food & Nutrition$5,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE AMERICAN MEDITATION INSTITUTE INC: $144,045 over 8y, 16% of budgetRensselaer Polytechnic Institute: $70,100 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWOODLAND HILL MONTESSORI SCHOOL: $42,700 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetHINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTEXAS INDIA FORUM: $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCAPITAL ROOTS INC: $10,700 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetITBHU GLOBAL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC: $10,500 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetAKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA): $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTREEN CHARITABLE EVENTS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetHINDUACTION: $5,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetFESTIVAL OF NATIONS INCORPORATED: $2,675 over 7y, 2.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBERKSHIRE BIRD PARADISE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetEMMA WILLARD SCHOOL: $1,501 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTAKEHOLDERS INC: $1,500 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBABY INSTITUTE INC: $900 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSPRING YOUTH BASEBALL INC: $850 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetTri-City India Association Inc: $800 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetTHE ALBANY ACADEMIES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRIGHTSTONE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIRANDA CHARITY CORP: $500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetHEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSARATOGA WARHORSE FOUNDATION INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHIRDI SAI MANDIR OF CAPITAL DISTRICT INC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $102 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD PANTRIES FOR THE CAPITAL DISTRICT INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHAKER ROAD - LOUDONVILLE FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTRIDE Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE ALBANY INC: $60 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundat…Price Chopper's Golub…Review FoundationPioneer Bank Charitab…Sarika and Vikram Agr…Ge Aerospace Foundati…Sunmark Charitable Co…Bbl Charitable Founda…The Ayco Charitable F…The Seymour Fox Memor…The McCarthy Charitie…David & Candace Weir …
The Community Foundation for the Greater Capital Region IncNY23.5× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for the Greater Capital Region Inc · Price Chopper's Golub Foundation · Review Foundation · Pioneer Bank Charitable Foundation · Sarika and Vikram Agrawal Family Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Sunmark Charitable Community Foundation · Bbl Charitable Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The Seymour Fox Memorial Foundation Inc · The McCarthy Charities Inc · David & Candace Weir Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Agrawal Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Agrawal Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Agrawal Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Agrawal Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Agrawal Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home