· Private foundation
Agrawal Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k7 grants · $9k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $70k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DECHOMAI FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| HINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION | $24,000 |
| AMERICAN MEDITATION INSTITUTE | $20,795 |
| HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL | $5,000 |
| OFFICE OF GENERAL SERVICES | $2,000 |
| FESTIVAL OF NATIONS | $600 |
| WHMS FUND | $500 |
| ADAM R SCRIPPS FOUNDATION | $250 |
| HINDU CULTURAL CENTER | $125 |
| RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE | $100 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–21, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +3% since the first grant, against -1% for the ones you funded once.
18 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute6× · 2019–2025 · $70k · revenue +13%- WHWOODLAND HILL MONTESSORI SCHOOL4× · 2018–2021 · $43k · revenue +57%
- CRCAPITAL ROOTS INC4× · 2021–2024 · $11k · revenue +8%
Funded once
- IAINDO AMERICAN COMMUNITY OF WEST ROCKAWAYone grant, 2024 · $50k
- TITEXAS INDIA FORUMone grant, 2019 · $25k
- UIUS INDIAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To represent every constituency of healthcare leadership, as well as health insurance, consumer and public interest. to work collaboratively, come up with innovative solutions, champion changes throughout our organizations, and dedicate…
The american india foundation(aif) is a nonprofit american development organization that is devoted to accelerating social and economic change in india.
Provide social development and relief assistance to underprivileged people primarily in india but also in nepal, sri lanka and the usa
Perform basic research and preclinical efficacy assessments of new molecular entities being developed for the prevention and treatment of cancer and infectious disease. Discover new pathways and targets for the design and development of…
Dedicated to the advancement of knowledge about india and the promotion of intellectual engagement with india in american universities by providing research fellowship support, training in indian languages, knowledge of indian culture, and…
See schedule ocri is a nonprofit organization dedicated to advancing cancer immunotherapy through scientific discovery and global collaboration. since 1953, cri has funded research that deepens understanding of the immune system and its…
The scripps research institute ("tsri") performs high impact basic biomedical research, improves the human condition by fostering translation of its discoveries into useful products and engages in the highest quality graduate scientific…
The institute for protein innovation is advancing protein science to accelerate research and improve human health.
Student senate is comprised of various clubs carrying on student and academic activities at the state university of new york at delhi (suny delhi). these activities are financed, in part, from mandatory fees levied each semester on…
To improve access to cutting-edge cancer care and minimize cancer health disparities in the united states and around the world.
Us-india policy institute (usipi)undertaking policy research on diversity and inclusive developments in india and the usa. usipis vision for equal access to freedom,justice, and opportunity in india rests on its three pillars; research &…
Transforming the success of the indian diaspora into meaningful impact worldwide.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Albany Academies Inc and the most unlike its peers is Festival of Nations Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE AMERICAN MEDITATION INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute ↗
- Who funds DECHOMAI FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WOODLAND HILL MONTESSORI SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds TEXAS INDIA FORUM ↗
- Who funds HINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL ROOTS INC ↗
- Who funds ITBHU GLOBAL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds TREEN CHARITABLE EVENTS INC ↗
- Who funds HINDUACTION ↗
- Who funds AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA) ↗
- Who funds FESTIVAL OF NATIONS INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds BERKSHIRE BIRD PARADISE INC ↗
- Who funds EMMA WILLARD SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR DISABILITY SERVICESINC ↗
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
- Who funds STAKEHOLDERS INC ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds BABY INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds SPRING YOUTH BASEBALL INC ↗
- Who funds Tri-City India Association Inc ↗
- Who funds HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BRIGHTSTONE INC ↗
- Who funds THE ALBANY ACADEMIES INC ↗
- Who funds MIRANDA CHARITY CORP ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for the Greater Capital Region Inc · Price Chopper's Golub Foundation · Review Foundation · Pioneer Bank Charitable Foundation · Sarika and Vikram Agrawal Family Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Sunmark Charitable Community Foundation · Bbl Charitable Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The Seymour Fox Memorial Foundation Inc · The McCarthy Charities Inc · David & Candace Weir Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Agrawal Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Shriners' Hospital for Children — 6% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Agrawal Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Agrawal Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.