Skip to content
AgeWays Nonprofit Senior Services at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

AgeWays Nonprofit Senior Services

The AgeWays Nonprofit Senior Services enhances the lives of older adults and adults with disabilities in the communities we serve.

$9.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
—
States reached
$2.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $407k
  • $250k+13 grants · $9.1M
$444,387
Median grant
—
States reached
$23M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Macomb Community Action$2,030,952
Community Outreach Services Corp DBA Western Oakland Meals on Wheels$1,479,992
Washtenaw County Office of Community and Economic Developement$902,882
Living Independence for Everyone (LIFE)$655,567
Council on Aging Inc serving St Clair County$592,432
Community Outreach Services Corp DBA Livingston County Senior Nutrition Pro$557,099
Older Persons' Commission$546,532
Lakeshore Legal Aid$532,505
Catholic Services of Washtenaw$444,387
Pontiac Meals on Wheels$437,580
Disability Network Eastern Michigan$325,471
City of Farmington Hills$303,603
Charter Township of Waterford$256,670
Livingston County Catholic Charities$201,463
Macomb County$133,515
02Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Marinette County Committee on Aging Inc

Our mission at Marinette County Elderly Services is to assist older persons in maintaining a longer, healthier, and more fulfilled life.

Human Services
2
Council on Aging Services for Seniors

To enhance the quality of life for our aging community by providing services that promote wellbeing and maintain independence.

—
3
Northwest Senior Resources Inc

To serve and advocate for older adults, adults with disabilities, and caregivers by supporting their independence, dignity, and quality of life.

Human Services
4
Area Agency On Aging of Western Michigan Inc

Through internal expertise, external partnerships, and advocacy, the area agency on aging of western michigan provides older adults, adults with disabilities, and their caregivers equitable access to services that promote independence and…

Human Services
5
Community Nutrition Network and Senior Services Association

The organization operates congregate and home delivered meal programs in suburban cook, grundy, will and kendall counties under contracts and grants with age option and ageguide (formerly northeastern illinois area agency on aging(neil)).…

Human Services
6
Stark County Council On Aging

Provide elderly services to allow persons to stay in their own homes

Human Services
7
Manistee County Council On Aging

Provide services for senior citizens both through the center and to those with limited resources or homebound.

Human Services
8
Dillon County Council On Aging

Provides senior center and congregate and home delivered meals, homemaker services allowing seniors to remain in their homes.

Human Services
9
AgeWays Nonprofit Senior Services

The ageways nonprofit senior services enhances the lives of older adults and adults with disabilities in the communities we serve.

Human Services
10
Cheboygan County Council On Aging

Provides information and services for senior citizens of cheboygan county.

Human Services
11
ShareCare of Leelanau Inc

To facilitate connecting the Leelanau county community of seniors with services and activities that promote a healthy independent and fulfilled lifestyle while aging.

Human Services
12
Aging and Community Services of South Central Indiana Inc

Working together, our mission is to enhance the quality of life in our communities, generation through generation to assist older adults, persons with disabilities, and persons that have needs, to access opportunities that will allow them…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Council On Aging Inc Serving St Clair County; the most unlike its peers is Living Independence for Everyone. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
02the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
1/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Macomb Community Action: $2,164,467 · OtherMacomb Community ActionWashtenaw County Office of Community and Economic Developement: $902,882 · OtherWashtenaw County Office of Community and Economic DevelopementTHE COUNCIL ON AGING INC SERVING ST CLAIR COUNTY: $592,432 · OtherTHE COUNCIL ON AGING INC SERVING ST CLAIR COUNTYROCHESTER HILLS-OAKLAND-ROCHESTER OLDER PERSONS COMMISSION: $546,532 · OtherROCHESTER HILLS-OAKLAND-ROCHESTER OLDER PERSONS COMMISSIONCatholic Social Services of Washtenaw County: $444,387 · OtherCatholic Social Services of Washtenaw CountyPontiac Meals on Wheels: $437,580 · OtherPontiac Meals on WheelsDISABILITY NETWORK EASTERN MICHIGAN: $325,471 · OtherDISABILITY NETWORK EASTERN MICHIGANCity of Farmington Hills: $303,603 · OtherCharter Township of Waterford: $256,670 · Other+1 more: $10,927 · OtherCOMMUNITY OUTREACH SERVICES CORPORATION: $2,037,091 · Housing & ShelterCOMMUNITY OUTREACH SERVI…LIVING INDEPENDENCE FOR EVERYONE: $655,567 · Food & NutritionLakeshore Legal Aid: $532,505 · Crime & LegalLIVINGSTON COUNTY CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $201,463 · Human ServicesNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN MICHIG: $71,970 · Community Improvement
Other$5,984,951Housing & Shelter$2,037,091Food & Nutrition$655,567Crime & Legal$532,505Human Services$201,463Community Improvement$71,970

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLIVING INDEPENDENCE FOR EVERYONE: $655,567 over 1y, 42% of budgetTHE COUNCIL ON AGING INC SERVING ST CLAIR COUNTY: $592,432 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetLakeshore Legal Aid: $532,505 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetDISABILITY NETWORK EASTERN MICHIGAN: $325,471 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetLIVINGSTON COUNTY CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $201,463 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN MICHIG: $71,970 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetDEAF COMMUNITY ADVOCACY NETWORK: $10,927 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way for Southe…Community Foundation …Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
United Way for Southeastern MichiganMI19.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way for Southeastern Michigan · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization AgeWays Nonprofit Senior Services funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from AgeWays Nonprofit Senior Services. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on AgeWays Nonprofit Senior Services’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home