Skip to content

· Public charity

Agency on Aging of South Central Connecticut

The organization's mission is to champion and serve older adults and individuals with disabilities so that they remain independent and engaged within their communities.

$4.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$2.6M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$15MHuman Services$7.7MHealth$1.4MCrime & Legal$669kReligion$244kHousing & Shelter$199kEnvironment$20k
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 18 grants below total $3,709,615, the rows itemized in this filing. The $4,026,212 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $316,597 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k15 grants · $379k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $92k
  • $250k+2 grants · $3.2M
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$19M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIFEBRIDGE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC$2,598,363
TEAM INC$640,000
MARY WADE AT HOME$92,274
MONITOR MY HEALTH INC$47,000
MILFORD SENIOR CENTER$30,000
MERIDEN SENIOR CENTER$30,000
NEW HAVEN LEGAL ASSISTANCE$30,000
INTERFAITH VOLUNTEER CARE GIVERS$30,000
COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC$25,000
CHRISTIAN TABERNACLE BAPTIST CHURCH$25,000
THE TOWERS FOUNDATION$22,500
GRIFFIN HOSPITAL LIFELINE PROGRAM$22,000
B-BRIDGES COMMUNITY SUPPORT$22,000
FELLOWSHIP PLACE$22,000
EAST SHORE REGIONAL ADULT DAY CARE$21,961
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

None of its grants could be placed against low income need for this view.

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$29M · 21 repeat orgs$119k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
9

Total granted

$29M
$119k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+17%

Still filing today

86%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthCrime & LegalFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TI
    TEAM INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $5.0M · revenue +67%
  • TM
    THE MARY WADE HOME INCORPORATED
    9× · 2017–2025 · $848k · revenue +41%
  • IV
    INTERFAITH VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS OF GREAT
    9× · 2017–2025 · $654k · revenue +78% · 53% of their budget

Funded once

  • CO
    CASA OTONAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $22k · revenue +257%
  • NEW HAVEN ECOLOGY PROJECT INC
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +5%
  • FH
    FAIR HAVEN COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $16k · revenue +278%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Connecticut Association of Health Care Facilities Inc

The association is the leader in providing services to and advocating for, the state's providers of long-term, subacute, rehabilitative, and assisted living care. additionally, the association serves as a clearing house for information…

—
2
Hartford HealthCare at Home Inc

The mission of the agency is to provide and safeguard quality home health care to all persons in need, especially the indigent and medically underserved population. The agency strongly believes that appropriate health care is a fundamental…

Health
3
Community Health Services Inc

To provide medical services for the residents of the greater hartford connecticut area. to provide quality health care services to low and moderate income individuals in the greater hartford connecticut area regardless of ability to pay.

Health
4
Mental Health Connecticut Inc

Mhc partners with individuals, their families, and surrounding communities to create environments that support long-term health and wellness.

Health
5
Visiting Nurse Services of Connecticut Inc

Visiting Nurse Services of Connecticut, Inc., (VNS) a nonprofit health care provider, finds its mission in the provision of quality home health and hospice services to individuals, families and the communities it serves. VNS is committed…

—
6
Connecticut Community Care Inc

Connecticut community care, inc provides person-centered care coordination and transition services for elders and individuals with disabilities to help ensure they can live safely in the place they choose to live. people served experience…

Health
7
Community Residences Inc

Housing and programs for persons with intellectual disabilities.

Human Services
8
Visiting Nurse Association of South Central Connecticut Inc

VNA of South Central Connecticut, Inc. is dedicated to enhancing the health, well being and quality of life at home and in the community is serves.

—
9
Hartford HealthCare Medical Group Specialists Pllc

The Mission of Hartford HealthCare Medical Group Specialists, PLLC is to put the patients first, provide coordinated quality care and value, exceed the expectations of patients, providers, staff and the community that it serves.

Health
10
Norwalk Community Health Center

To provide quality, innovative care that enriches the lives of our patients.

Health
11
Connecticut Counseling Centers Inc

To provide substance abuse and mental health treatment services. programs include methadone maintenance, outpatient, hiv, detoxification and dually diagnosed treatments and counseling.

—
12
The Connecticut Center for Nursing Workforce Inc

To foster collaborations to ensure a highly educated, diverse and sustainable nursing workforce to support the healthcare needs of connecticut residents.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifebridge Community Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Apostles of the Sacred Heart Clelian Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
21/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LIFEBRIDGE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $19,157,566 · Human ServicesLIFEBRIDGE COMMUNITY SERVICES INCTEAM INC: $5,036,373 · Human ServicesTEAM INC+5 more: $1,029,367 · Human ServicesTHE MARY WADE HOME INCORPORATED: $848,016 · HealthMONITOR MY HEALTH INC: $448,335 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $325,274 · HealthBRIDGES HEALTHCARE INC: $234,291 · HealthBHcare Inc: $195,228 · Health+1 more: $16,143 · HealthNEW HAVEN LEGAL ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION INC: $478,680 · OtherApostles of the Sacred Heart Clelian Center Inc: $372,242 · OtherCHRISTIAN TABERNACLE BAPTIST CHURCH: $268,520 · OtherMERIDEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $209,620 · OtherTHE TOWERS FOUNDATION INC: $199,500 · Other+9 more: $195,490 · OtherCONNECTICUT VETERANS LEGAL CENTER INC: $240,000 · Crime & LegalMILFORD COUNCIL ON AGING CORPORATION: $63,664 · Housing & ShelterNEW HAVEN ECOLOGY PROJECT INC: $20,000 · Food & Nutrition
Human Services$25,223,306Health$2,067,287Other$1,724,052Crime & Legal$240,000Housing & Shelter$63,664Food & Nutrition$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLIFEBRIDGE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $19,157,566 over 9y, 29% of budgetTEAM INC: $5,036,373 over 9y, 3.9% of budgetTHE MARY WADE HOME INCORPORATED: $848,016 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetINTERFAITH VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS OF GREAT: $653,779 over 9y, 53% of budgetNEW HAVEN LEGAL ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION INC: $478,680 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetMONITOR MY HEALTH INC: $448,335 over 5y, 17% of budgetApostles of the Sacred Heart Clelian Center Inc: $372,242 over 9y, 8.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $325,274 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT VETERANS LEGAL CENTER INC: $240,000 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetBRIDGES HEALTHCARE INC: $234,291 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetEAST SHORE REGIONAL ADULT DAYCARE CENTER INC: $218,442 over 9y, 4.1% of budgetTHE TOWERS FOUNDATION INC: $199,500 over 4y, 11% of budgetBHcare Inc: $195,228 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNICATION ADVOCACY NETWORK CORP: $134,506 over 7y, 12% of budgetMILFORD COUNCIL ON AGING CORPORATION: $63,664 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetFELLOWSHIP PLACE INC: $52,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCLIFFORD BEERS COMMUNITY CARE CENTER INC: $48,205 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCASA OTONAL INC: $21,500 over 1y, 15% of budgetNEW HAVEN ECOLOGY PROJECT INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFAIR HAVEN COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC INC: $16,143 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWALLINGFORD COMMITTEE ON AGING INC: $12,640 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF GREATER NEW HAV: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetVNA Community Healthcare Inc: $9,453 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LIFEBRIDGE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds TEAM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MARY WADE HOME INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds INTERFAITH VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS OF GREAT ↗
  • Who funds NEW HAVEN LEGAL ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MONITOR MY HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds Apostles of the Sacred Heart Clelian Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT VETERANS LEGAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGES HEALTHCARE INC ↗
  • Who funds EAST SHORE REGIONAL ADULT DAYCARE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TOWERS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BHcare Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNICATION ADVOCACY NETWORK CORP ↗
  • Who funds MILFORD COUNCIL ON AGING CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds CLIFFORD BEERS COMMUNITY CARE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA OTONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW HAVEN ECOLOGY PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds FAIR HAVEN COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds FRANCISCAN LIFE CENTER NETWORK INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds WALLINGFORD COMMITTEE ON AGING INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF GREATER NEW HAV ↗
  • Who funds VNA Community Healthcare Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation for Greater New HavenCT31.6× affinity13 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater New Haven · Newalliance Foundation Inc · Yale University · Ion Bank Foundation Inc · William Caspar Graustein Memorial Fund · United Way of Greater New Haven Inc · Ethel & Abe Lapides Foundation Inc · Peoples United Community Foundation · Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · CommuniCare · Branford Community Foundation · Eastern Connecticut Area Agency on Aging Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Agency on Aging of South Central Connecticut funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Agency on Aging of South Central Connecticut. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 32%
  • Team Inc: 84% of income from government
  • Clifford Beers Community Care Center Inc: 75% of income from government
  • BHcare Inc: 68% of income from government
  • Bridges Healthcare Inc: 67% of income from government
  • Fellowship Place Inc: 66% of income from government
  • Casa Otonal Inc: 59% of income from government
  • Communication Advocacy Network Corp: 45% of income from government
  • Monitor My Health Inc: 36% of income from government
  • Lifebridge Community Services Inc: 32% of income from government
  • Fair Haven Community Health Clinic Inc: 18% of income from government
  • Connecticut Veterans Legal Center Inc: 12% of income from government
  • Community Health Center Inc: 10% of income from government
  • New Haven Ecology Project Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Milford Council On Aging Corporation: 2% of income from government
  • The Mary Wade Home Incorporated: 2% of income from government
  • New Haven Legal Assistance Association Inc: 2% of income from government
  • East Shore Regional Adult Daycare Center Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Franciscan Life Center Network Incorporated: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
6rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Agency on Aging of South Central Connecticut’s filings →

More from the funding graph