Skip to content
Aged & Indigent Old Folks of El Paso County at a glance

· Private foundation

Aged & Indigent Old Folks of El Paso County

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$41k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$128kFood & Nutrition$97kArts & Culture$73kHousing & Shelter$20kPublic Safety & Disaster$6k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$620k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGER$25,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
PRO ACTION$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–22, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%HOSPICE OF EL PASO INC: $10k → 21%OPPORTUNITY CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS: $20k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$268k · 4 repeat orgs$56k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
3

Total granted

$268k
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+83%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $85k · revenue +17%
  • EP
    EL PASO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOC INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $63k · revenue +19%
  • RG
    RIO GRANDE CANCER FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $22k · revenue +84%

Funded once

  • OC
    OPPORTUNITY CENTER FOR THE HOMELESSgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +83%
  • HO
    HOSPICE OF EL PASO INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +114%
  • PB
    Prevent Blindness Texasgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +26%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
El Paso County Medical Society

Professional association of physicians.

—
2
Cancer Consortium of El Paso

The organization provides breast and cervical cancer screening, case management for diagnosed cancer patients, and community education on cancer to low income women that fall under the 200% poverty level and women over 50 that do not have…

Health
3
El Paso Human Services Inc

El paso human services, inc. (ephsi), a private non-profit multi-purpose organization, has been providing social services in el paso county since 1984. ephsi has extensive experience in developing, implementing and executing federal, state…

Human Services
4
El Paso Pro-Musica

To present world-renowned musicians with a commitment to artisitic excellence to delight and educate the border region with chamber music.

—
5
El Paso Symphony Foundation

El paso symphony foundation is a separate corporation which provides the el paso symphony orchestra association with charitable and educational support.

—
6
El Paso Chamber of Commerce Foundation

The el paso chamber exists to operate exclusively for charitable, educational, scientific, and literary purposes relating to the city of el paso. the chamber foundation serves as its supporting organization to pursue grants to fund…

—
7
El Paso Coalition for the Homeless Inc

The coalition is designated as the lead entity by hud for dozens of agencies and indivduals who provide housing, services, and support to the homeless community in el paso and carries out the responsibility of leading and managing the…

Housing & Shelter
8
El Paso Matters Inc

Engage in the highest quality independent production, publication and or distribution of orginial news and or news-based materials of community value to far west texas, southern new mexico and northern chihuahua, mexico.

Public Benefit
9
Humane Society of El Paso Inc

The prevention of suffering, neglect, abuse, and cruelty of animalsby providing information, raising public awareness of animal issues,and promoting responsible pet ownership and kindness to all livingthings in west texas.

Animals
10
Paso Del Norte Health Information Exchange

Paso del Norte Health Information Exchange exists to promote the health of El Paso County and surrounding communities by facilitating the creation and operation of a health information exchange. The central activity of the organization is…

Health
11
Texas Palliative Care

Texas palliative care operates to strengthen and further the goals and purpose of hospice of east texas, a texas non-profit corporation.

Health
12
Texas Pharmacy Association

The association's purpose is to promote the role of the pharmacist and the practice of pharmacy in the state of texas.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospice of El Paso Inc; the most unlike its peers is Prevent Blindness Texas. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGER: $97,407 · Food & NutritionEL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGERALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $85,413 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED D…PRO-ACTION INC: $5,500 · HealthPRO-ACTION INCEL PASO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOC INC: $63,100 · Arts & CultureEL PASO SYMPHONY ORCHE…RIO GRANDE CANCER FOUNDATION: $22,371 · OtherRIO GRANDE CAN…Individual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual gra…Prevent Blindness Texas: $10,000 · OtherPrevent Blindn…OPPORTUNITY CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS: $20,000 · Human ServicesOPPORTUNIT…HOSPICE OF EL PASO INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesHOSPICE OF…
Food & Nutrition$97,407Health$90,913Arts & Culture$63,100Other$42,371Human Services$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGER: $97,407 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $85,413 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetEL PASO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOC INC: $63,100 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetRIO GRANDE CANCER FOUNDATION: $22,371 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetOPPORTUNITY CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHOSPICE OF EL PASO INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPRO-ACTION INC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wilma Donohue Moleen …Lula H McAfee Foundat…Carrie Morton Brown F…El Paso Community Fou…Amazonsmile Foundation
Wilma Donohue Moleen Foundation Xxxxx7003IL15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wilma Donohue Moleen Foundation Xxxxx7003 · Lula H McAfee Foundation Xxxxx7006 · Carrie Morton Brown Foundation Xxxxx0003 · El Paso Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Aged & Indigent Old Folks of El Paso County funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Aged & Indigent Old Folks of El Paso County. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Aged & Indigent Old Folks of El Paso County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home