Skip to content
Adventist Health Clearlake Hospital Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Adventist Health Clearlake Hospital Inc

Living God's love by inspiring health, wholeness and hope.

$364k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$255k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$760kHuman Services$619kHealth$518kCommunity Improvement$416kPublic Benefit$348kReligion$270kEducation$192kScience & Tech$166kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $279,733, the rows itemized in this filing. The $363,554 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $83,821 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $17k
  • $250k+1 grant · $255k
$16,800
Median grant
1
States reached
$165M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
California Health Fund & Trust$255,433
Lake County Wine Alliance$16,800
Clearlake Youth Soccer League$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–22, $935k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Redwood Community Services Inc: $354k → 17%North Coast Opportunities Inc: $141k → 18%North Coast Opportunities Inc: $110k → 18%North Coast Opportunities Inc: $110k → 18%North Coast Opportunities Inc: $55k → 18%Sunrise Special Services Foundation: $110k → 17%Sunrise Special Services Foundation: $55k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 8 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
13

Total granted

$2.4M
$1.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-40%
0%

Still filing today

88%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
Human ServicesPhilanthropyEducationHealthArts & CultureInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NORTH COAST OPPORTUNITIES INC
    4× · 2019–2022 · $416k · revenue +49%
  • LC
    Lake County Regional Office of Education Foundation Inc
    2× · 2019–2020 · $165k · revenue ×142
  • GL
    GREATER LAKEPORT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
    2× · 2021–2022 · $24k · revenue +68%

Funded once

  • RC
    REDWOOD COMMUNITY SERVICESgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $354k · revenue +61%
  • PO
    PRAISES OF ZION BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2019 · $200k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $166k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lake County Economic Development Corporation
—
2
Lake County United Inc

Promotion of social welfare

Civil Rights
3
Lake Area Helping Hands Inc

Homeless shelter

Housing & Shelter
4
Lake County Arts Council

Promotes Arts in Lake County through the operation of an Art Gallery and a Community Theatre.

Arts & Culture
5
Lake County Community Housing

Provide decent affordable housing to low income residents of Lake County area through the development, subsidizing, or restoration or exisiting housing available to lower income individuals

Housing & Shelter
6
Leadership Lake County Inc

Development of Lake County Community

Community Improvement
7
Lakes Area Community Center

Community service

Community Improvement
8
Lake County Community Services Inc

Administer federal and state grants providing services to low-income, elderly, handicapped persons and families.

Philanthropy
9
Lake Region Halfway Homes Inc

Halfway home for the chemically dependent

Health
10
Lakeside Lutheran Home

Care of the aged

Human Services
11
Lake Area Rotary Club Association

Supporting and enhancing the charitable activities of the rotary clubs of lake county ca in areas of fundraising, event co-sponsorship and joint efforts to address humanitarian needs in the larger community.

Community Improvement
12
Lake County Area Churches Charities

Provide low cost, fresh & frozen foodfor

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Coast Opportunities Inc; the most unlike its peers is Clearlake Youth Soccer League. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
4/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CALIFORNIA HEALTH FOUNDATION AND TRUST: $1,166,875 · PhilanthropyCALIFORNIA HEALTH FOUNDATION AND TRUSTCounty Of Lake: $248,407 · OtherCounty Of LakePRAISES OF ZION BAPTIST CHURCH: $200,000 · OtherPRAISES OF ZION BAPTIST CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $165,605 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCity of Clearlake: $100,000 · OtherCity of ClearlakeTHE UNITED VETERANS COUNCIL OF LAKE COUNTY INC: $100,000 · OtherTHE UNITED VETERANS COUNCIL OF …Kelseyville United Methodist Church: $70,000 · OtherKelseyville United Methodist Ch…+7 more: $63,159 · Other+7 moreNORTH COAST OPPORTUNITIES INC: $416,041 · Human ServicesNORTH COAST OPPORTUNITIES INCREDWOOD COMMUNITY SERVICES: $353,959 · Human ServicesREDWOOD COMMUNITY SERVICESSUNRISE SPECIAL SERVICES FOUNDATION: $165,000 · Human ServicesSUNRISE SPECIAL SERVICES FOUNDA…Lake County Regional Office of Education Foundation Inc: $165,432 · EducationHOPE IS RISING LAKE COUNTY INC: $140,333 · HealthLAKE COUNTY WINE ALLIANCE: $26,800 · Arts & CultureWORLDWIDE HEALING HANDS: $11,000 · InternationalCLEARLAKE YOUTH SOCCER LEAGUE: $7,500 · Recreation & Sports
Philanthropy$1,166,875Other$947,171Human Services$935,000Education$165,432Health$140,333Arts & Culture$26,800International$11,000Recreation & Sports$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCALIFORNIA HEALTH FOUNDATION AND TRUST: $1,166,875 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetNORTH COAST OPPORTUNITIES INC: $416,041 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetREDWOOD COMMUNITY SERVICES: $353,959 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetSUNRISE SPECIAL SERVICES FOUNDATION: $165,000 over 2y, 37% of budgetHOPE IS RISING LAKE COUNTY INC: $140,333 over 2y, 11% of budgetLAKE COUNTY WINE ALLIANCE: $26,800 over 2y, 8.4% of budgetGREATER LAKEPORT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $24,114 over 2y, 7.7% of budgetWORLDWIDE HEALING HANDS: $11,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetCLEARLAKE YOUTH SOCCER LEAGUE: $7,500 over 1y, 6.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sutter Bay HospitalsAmazonsmile Foundation
Sutter Bay HospitalsCA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sutter Bay Hospitals · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Adventist Health Clearlake Hospital Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Adventist Health Clearlake Hospital Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Adventist Health Clearlake Hospital Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Adventist Health Clearlake Hospital Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Adventist Health Clearlake Hospital’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home