Skip to content
Adopt-A-Soldier Platoon Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Adopt-A-Soldier Platoon Inc

The organization's mission is to lift the morale and support the welfare of active members and veterans of the United States Armed Forces, their immediate families, and the immediate families of deceased veterans.

$410k
Granted FY2023
3
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2023.

Housing & Shelter$75kPublic Benefit$55kHuman Services$50kHealth$35k
02FY2023 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $30,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $410,121 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $380,121 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$196k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Montachusett Veterans Outreach Center$10,000
Help Our Military Heroes$10,000
Homes for Veterans$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 40% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Warriors Helping Warriors: $10k → 10%Truckin 4 Troops Inc: $15k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$168k · 4 repeat orgs$47k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2023, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
4

Total granted

$168k
$47k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+179%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23
Public BenefitHealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HOMES FOR VETERANS A NJ NON PROFIT CORPORATION
    4× · 2020–2023 · $50k · revenue -12%
  • MV
    MONTACHUSETT VETERANS OUTREACH CENTER I
    4× · 2020–2023 · $50k · revenue +135%
  • HO
    Help Our Military Heroes Inc
    4× · 2020–2023 · $45k · revenue -73%

Funded once

  • T4
    TRUCKIN 4 TROOPS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +42%
  • VC
    VALOR CLINIC FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $12k · revenue +358%
  • VI
    VETGROUP INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +179%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Vets Community Connections

The VCC mission is to assist veterans, military, and their families in successfully integrating into their community by connecting them with local individuals and organizations that can assist them in building thriving lives.

—
2
Usa Project Valor

Non-Profit Charity to provide housing for homeless veterans

Housing & Shelter
3
Hope4vets
Housing & Shelter
4
Wellness 4 Warriors Inc

Improving the life of Veterans

—
5
Veterans & Community Resource Center Corp

Provide information to Military Veterans & their family members.

Human Services
6
Hookin Veterans
Public Benefit
7
Homes 4 Vets Cooperative Corporatio

Provides Homes for Veterans

Public Benefit
8
Vetality Corp

Services for veterans

—
9
Homes for Heroes Foundation
Housing & Shelter
10
Connect Vets

Connect Vets is organized exclusively for charitable purposes to further the successful transition of low income, disabled, and mentally unhealthy veterans and their families through the provision of shelter, mentorship, advocacy,…

Human Services
11
Veterans Rock

Veterans charity

Human Services
12
Warrior Legacy Foundation

Providing assistance to wounded military

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Valor Clinic Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Homes for Veterans a Nj Non Profit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MONTACHUSETT VETERANS OUTREACH CENTER I: $50,000 · Public BenefitMONTACHUSETT VETERANS OUTREACH CENTER IHelp Our Military Heroes Inc: $45,000 · Public BenefitHelp Our Military Heroes IncVETGROUP INC: $10,000 · Public BenefitVETGROUP INCHOMES FOR VETERANS A NJ NON PROFIT CORPORATION: $50,000 · Housing & ShelterHOMES FOR VETERANS A NJ NO…Camp4Heroes Inc: $23,000 · HealthCamp4Heroes IncVALOR CLINIC FOUNDATION: $11,500 · HealthVALOR CLINIC FOUND…TRUCKIN 4 TROOPS INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesTRUCKIN 4 TRO…WARRIORS HELPING WARRIORS: $10,000 · Human ServicesWARRIORS HELP…
Public Benefit$105,000Housing & Shelter$50,000Health$34,500Human Services$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOMES FOR VETERANS A NJ NON PROFIT CORPORATION: $50,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetMONTACHUSETT VETERANS OUTREACH CENTER I: $50,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetHelp Our Military Heroes Inc: $45,000 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetCamp4Heroes Inc: $23,000 over 3y, 6.8% of budgetTRUCKIN 4 TROOPS INC: $15,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetVALOR CLINIC FOUNDATION: $11,500 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetVETGROUP INC: $10,000 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetWARRIORS HELPING WARRIORS: $10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodAmazonsmile Foundation
Network for GoodDC8.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Adopt-A-Soldier Platoon Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Adopt-A-Soldier Platoon Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 49%
  • Montachusett Veterans Outreach Center I: 50% of income from government
  • Warriors Helping Warriors: 49% of income from government
  • Vetgroup Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Adopt-A-Soldier Platoon Inc?

Find your warmest path to Adopt-A-Soldier Platoon Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $331k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Adopt-A-Soldier Platoon’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home