Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Admirals Power Play Foundation Inc

Distribution to 501(c)(3) organizations in the milwaukee area.

$107k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
States reached
$107k
Largest
01What you fund
0189% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Health$128kHuman Services$48kRecreation & Sports$36kPhilanthropy$27kYouth Development$24kCommunity Improvement$20kFood & Nutrition$14kEducation$11kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$106,563
Median grant
States reached
$483k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VARIOUS ORGANIZATIONS$106,563
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UMOS UNITED MIGRANT OPPORTUNITY SERVICES INCORPORATED: $9k → 17%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

44%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$192k · 8 repeat orgs$247k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
17

Total granted

$192k
$140k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+7%

Still filing today

63%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $107k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SPECIAL OLYMPICS WISCONSIN INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $36k · revenue +38%
  • RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF EASTERN WISCONSIN INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $32k · revenue +53%
  • JB
    Jockey Being Family Foundation Ltd
    2× · 2018–2019 · $15k · revenue +61%

Funded once

  • MILWAUKEE DOWNTOWN INC
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +6%
  • TA
    THE ALS ASSOCIATION INC WISCONSIN CHAPTER
    one grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue +30%
  • CO
    CHILDREN'S OUTING ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2020 · $19k · revenue -15%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Disability Rights Wisconsin Inc

Legal protection and advocacy to protect the rights of people with disabilities in wisconsin.

2
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

3
Wisconsin Lutheran Home Ministries Inc

To share christ's love as we serve the spiritual, physical, intellectual and emotional needs of people entrusted to our care and others whose lives we touch.

4
Milkworks Inc

Creating a healthier community by empowering families to reach their breastfeeding goals.

Health
5
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

6
Wisconsin Association of Health Plans Inc

Promote a positive state legislative and regulatory climate for wisconsin's community health plans. the association communicates with regulatory agencies to promote issue positions representing community health plans.

7
Wisconsin Medical Society Inc

To improve the health of the people of wisconsin by supporting and strengthening physicians' ability to practice high quality patient care in a changing environment.

8
My Choice Wisconsin Inc

We inspire people to experience life at its fullest by encouraging ownership of health, fostering independence, and serving the whole person; and do so with an unwavering commitment as stewards of medicaid funding.

Health
9
Aurora Family Service Inc

Aurora family service partners with families to enhance their capability to anticipate, identify and manage challenges they face in their everyday lives through the integration of health, mental health, and social services providing…

Health
10
Oshkosh Convention & Visitors Bureau Inc

To promote oshkosh and winnebago county a premier destination for corporate, sports, and leisure groups and individual visitors.

11
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
12
Pathways of Wisconsin Inc

Pathways of wisconsin provides supported employment opportunities and empowerment through quality, person-centered programming for individuals of all abilities.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc and the most unlike its peers is Jockey Being Family Foundation Ltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VARIOUS ORGANIZATIONS — $106,563 · OtherVARIOUS ORGANIZATIONSAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY — $42,862 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETYCHILDREN'S OUTING ASSOCIATION — $19,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S OUTING ASSOCIATIONHUNGER TASK FORCE INC — $13,945 · OtherHUNGER TASK FORCE INCUNITED WAY — $11,750 · OtherSAINT THOMAS MORE HIGH SCHOOL INC — $10,500 · Other+6 more — $31,540 · Other+6 moreRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF EASTERN WISCONSIN INC — $31,800 · HealthRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARI…MARCH OF DIMES INC — $30,000 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INCTHE ALS ASSOCIATION INC WISCONSIN CHAPTER — $19,598 · HealthTHE ALS ASSOCIATION INC WIS…ABCD INC — $8,000 · HealthABCD INCALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $5,386 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN INC — $5,000 · HealthNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $5,000 · HealthSPECIAL OLYMPICS WISCONSIN INC — $36,071 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL O…Jockey Being Family Foundation Ltd — $15,000 · PhilanthropyLITTLE WARRIOR FOUNDATION INC — $7,623 · PhilanthropyAURORA HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · PhilanthropyMILWAUKEE DOWNTOWN INC — $20,000 · Community ImprovementUNITED MIGRANT OPPORTUNITY SERVICES UMOS INC — $9,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE OF MILWAUKEE INC — $5,000 · Human Services
Other$236,160Health$104,784Recreation & Sports$36,071Philanthropy$27,623Community Improvement$20,000Human Services$14,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS WISCONSIN INC — $36,071 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF EASTERN WISCONSIN INC — $31,800 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC — $30,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE DOWNTOWN INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE ALS ASSOCIATION INC WISCONSIN CHAPTER — $19,598 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S OUTING ASSOCIATION — $19,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHUNGER TASK FORCE INC — $13,945 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED MIGRANT OPPORTUNITY SERVICES UMOS INC — $9,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetABCD INC — $8,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetLITTLE WARRIOR FOUNDATION INC — $7,623 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUSO WISCONSIN INC — $6,540 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $5,386 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAURORA HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE OF MILWAUKEE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAD LAKE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County IncWI25.9× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Waukesha County Community Foundation · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Brewers Community Foundation Inc · Ralph Evinrude Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Marcus Corporation Foundation Inc · Northwestern Mutual Life Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Admirals Power Play Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Admirals Power Play Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Admirals Power Play Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $54k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph