Skip to content
Adel B Korkor Md Foundation for Mental at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Adel B Korkor Md Foundation for Mental

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$110k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$810kEducation$134kInternational$62kHuman Services$54kYouth Development$43kArts & Culture$16kHousing & Shelter$5kFood & Nutrition$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $49k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$11,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ACCESS$50,000
GIVING VOICE TO DEPRESSION$37,545
THE FIT KIDS FOUNDTION$11,000
KARAM FOUNDATION$5,000
PATHFINDERS MILWAUKEE INC$5,000
FOOD FOR HEALTH$1,800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%The Bridge: $375 → 14%ACCESS: $50k → 21%Centro Hispano of Dane County: $5k → 10%PATHFINDERS MILWAUKEE INC: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OH
CT
CA
VA
NM
KS
TN
MS
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$872k · 16 repeat orgs$205k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
35

Total granted

$872k
$198k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+11%

Still filing today

63%
34%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    PENFIELD CHILDREN'S CENTER INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $100k · revenue +45%
  • MU
    Marquette University
    4× · 2020–2023 · $50k · revenue +24%
  • TF
    THE FIT KIDS FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $33k · revenue +65%

Funded once

  • MC
    Medical College of WI
    one grant, 2020 · $52k
  • CU
    CARROLL UNIVERSITY INC
    one grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue +4%
  • EW
    Empowerment Works Incgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $21k · revenue ×47 · 49% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Medical College of Wisconsin Inc

The medical college of wisconsin (mcw) is a distinguished leader and innovator in the education and development of the next generation of physicians, (continued in schedule o)

Education
2
Wisconsin Family Ties Inc

Wisconsin family ties changes lives by improving children's mental health. it accomplishes this mission through a set of interrelated activities that support and educate parents, and inform practitioners, policy makers and the public about…

—
3
Wisconsin Medical Society Inc

To improve the health of the people of wisconsin by supporting and strengthening physicians' ability to practice high quality patient care in a changing environment.

—
4
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
5
Disability Rights Wisconsin Inc

Legal protection and advocacy to protect the rights of people with disabilities in wisconsin.

—
6
Wisconsin Association of Health Plans Inc

Promote a positive state legislative and regulatory climate for wisconsin's community health plans. the association communicates with regulatory agencies to promote issue positions representing community health plans.

—
7
Wisconsin School Counselor Association Inc

Our vision is for wisconsin to be the model for excellence in equitable school counseling practice, exemplified by the advocacy, leadership, and expertise of the members of the wsca.

—
8
Chicago Psychoanalytic Institute

The chicago psychoanalytic institute transforms the lives of individuals, families and communities, using psychoanalytic knowledge to help them grow and thrive.

Social Science
9
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
10
Milwaukee Women Inc

Milwaukee women inc is an organization of executives determined to change the quality and composition of corporate boards to maximize the performance of public and private companies with a focus on women and women of color.

Education
11
Milwaukee Area Health Education Center Inc

The mission of milwaukee area health education center, inc. (ahec) is to increase the diversity and distribution of health professionals through strategic partnerships to improve the health outcomes in southeastern wisconsin.

Human Services
12
Nami Greater Milwaukee Inc

Improving the lives of those with mental illness.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Arab Community Center for Economic and S; the most unlike its peers is National Arab American Women Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/26
Grantees still filing
18/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Giving Voice to Depression: $281,518 · OtherGiving Voice to DepressionUniversity of Wisconsin - Milwaukee: $125,000 · OtherUniversity of Wisconsin - MilwaukeeUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison: $125,000 · OtherUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMedical College of WI: $52,000 · OtherMedical College of WI+33 more: $134,937 · Other+33 moreUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $54,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF…Marquette University: $50,000 · EducationMarquette Uni…CARROLL UNIVERSITY INC: $29,686 · EducationCARROLL UNIVE…PENFIELD CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $100,000 · HealthPENFIELD CHI…Mental Health America of Wisconsin Inc: $5,000 · HealthPROHEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · HealthBRAIN RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $4,500 · Health+3 more: $5,550 · HealthARAB COMMUNITY CENTER FOR ECONOMIC AND S: $50,000 · Human ServicesPATHFINDERS MILWAUKEE INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesCENTRO HISPANO INC: $5,000 · Human Services+1 more: $375 · Human ServicesKARAM FOUNDATION: $41,000 · PhilanthropyTHE FIT KIDS FOUNDATION INC: $32,500 · Youth DevelopmentEmpowerment Works Inc: $21,349 · International
Other$718,455Education$133,686Health$120,050Human Services$60,375Philanthropy$41,000Youth Development$32,500International$21,349

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPENFIELD CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $100,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $54,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetARAB COMMUNITY CENTER FOR ECONOMIC AND S: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMarquette University: $50,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKARAM FOUNDATION: $41,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTHE FIT KIDS FOUNDATION INC: $32,500 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetCARROLL UNIVERSITY INC: $29,686 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEmpowerment Works Inc: $21,349 over 1y, 49% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetART WITH IMPACT: $16,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetNAMI SOUTHEAST WISCONSIN INC: $6,650 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetThe Guest House of Milwaukee Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPATHFINDERS MILWAUKEE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMental Health America of Wisconsin Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCENTRO HISPANO INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPROHEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBRAIN RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $4,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $2,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE MADISON INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD FOR HEALTH INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetInternational OCD Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWAUKESHA COUNTY LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLA CASA DE ESPERANZA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BRIDGE: $375 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Milwaukee Fou…Green Bay Packers Fou…The Charles E Kubly F…United Way of Greater…Herbert H Kohl Charit…Waukesha County Commu…Otto Bremer TrustEmory T Clark Family …STACKNER FAMILY FOUND…Evan & Marion Helfaer…Baird Foundation IncGe Aerospace Foundati…
Greater Milwaukee Foundation IncWI25.1× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · The Charles E Kubly Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Waukesha County Community Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Emory T Clark Family Foundation · STACKNER FAMILY FOUNDATION INC co KRISTIN A OCCHETTI · Evan & Marion Helfaer Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Adel B Korkor Md Foundation for Mental funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Adel B Korkor Md Foundation for Mental. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Adel B Korkor Md Foundation for Mental?

    Find your warmest path to Adel B Korkor Md Foundation for Mental through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Adel B Korkor Md Foundation for Mental’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home