Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Adams Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$41k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$205kPhilanthropy$115kFood & Nutrition$51kReligion$46kHealth$20kArts & Culture$16kYouth Development$7kSocial Science$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k17 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$858k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLLEGE DRIVE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$10,000
MUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY$5,000
MUSKINGUM COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$5,000
MUSKINGUM COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$5,000
NATIONAL REVIEW INSTITUTE$5,000
MUSKINGUM COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$2,000
MUSKINGUM COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$2,000
OPEN DOOR MINISTRIES$1,500
ZANESVILLE MUSEUM OF ART$1,000
MUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY$1,000
MUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY$1,000
OPEN DOOR MINISTRIES$1,000
MUSKINGUM COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$500
VILLAGE OF NEW CONCORD$500
MUSKINGUM COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%VINCENTIAN OHIO ACTION NETWORK: $1k → 15%VINCENTIAN OHIO ACTION NETWORK: $500 → 15%FOREVERDADS: $50 → 14%FOREVERDADS: $50 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 7% of Adams Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Adams Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$333k · 12 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
9

Total granted

$333k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
+39%

Still filing today

67%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $200 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureReligionHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MU
    MUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $197k · revenue +27%
  • NR
    NATIONAL REVIEW INSTITUTE
    2× · 2022–2024 · $6k · revenue +44%
  • ZM
    ZANESVILLE MUSEUM OF ART
    4× · 2020–2024 · $4k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • EM
    EAST MUSKINGUM UMBRELLA BOOSTERSgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $6k · revenue +57%
  • CP
    CAMP PRESMONT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $4k · revenue +39%
  • JG
    John Glenn High School
    one grant, 2020 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Muskingum County Arts Council

The mission of the council is to create an engaged and vibrant community through arts, humanities, and culture.

Community Improvement
2
Muskingum Economic Opportunity Action Group

The organization's mission is to establish effective programs that mobilize and utilize bothpublic and private resources in a proactive and concerted attack on poverty in muskingum county, ohio and its surrounding areas by establishing and…

3
Evansville Museum of Arts History & Science

The museum's mission is to enrich lives through preservation, exploration, enlightenment and amazement.

Arts & Culture
4
Muskingum Watershed Conservancy Foundation Inc

Dedicated to supporting the mission of the muskingum watershed conservancy district by providing financial resources that enhance facilities, programs, and conservation efforts on or adjacent to district lands and waters.

Environment
5
Sandusky State Theatre Inc

The sandusky state theatre was originally created in 1928 and was reinvented several times since its inception. the arts, particularly the performing arts, are a reflection and a documentation of our culture and society. therefore, in…

Arts & Culture
6
Southern Ohio Museum Corporation

Housing a museum and cultural center with changing exhibits, permanent exhibits, performing arts and educational classes.

Arts & Culture
7
Muskingum Recreation Center

Dedicated to providing residents and visitors a safe, clean, and well maintained facility that promotes health, education, and recreation through a network of quality programs, activities, and amenities.

Recreation & Sports
8
The Dayton Art Institute

The dayton art institute is committed to enriching the community by creating meaningful experiences with art that are available to all.

Arts & Culture
9
The Arts Commission of Greater Toledo I

To develop and promote arts in the greater toledo community

Arts & Culture
10
Cincinnati Museum Center

Cincinnati museum center inspires people of all ages to learn more about our world through science, regional history, and educational, engaging and meaningful experiences.

Arts & Culture
11
Greater Marion Community Area New Development-Can Do

Promoting growth and expansion of jobs and community benefits for marion city & county

Community Improvement
12
Artists Archives of the Western Res

The artists archives of the western reserve preserves representative bodies of work created by ohio visual artists and, through ongoing research, exhibition and educational programs, actively documents and promotes this cultural heritage…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Muskingum County Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Pritchard Laughlin Civic Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%10%<5yr14%10%5–10yr20%5%10–20yr21%35%20–35yr14%20%35–55yr13%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr20%1%10–20yr21%8%20–35yr14%34%35–55yr13%56%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 5% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
5%
1/21
the rest of the field
11%
2,881/26,528

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY — $197,200 · EducationMUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY+1 more — $6,000 · EducationCOLLEGE DRIVE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $87,464 · OtherCOLLEGE DRIVE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHGUERNSEY HEALTH SYSTEMS — $20,000 · OtherGUERNSEY HEALTH SYSTEMSOPEN DOOR MINISTRIES — $12,500 · OtherOPEN DOOR MINISTRIESNATIONAL REVIEW INSTITUTE — $6,000 · Other+9 more — $12,924 · Other+9 moreTHE MUSKINGUM COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $111,550 · PhilanthropyTHE MUSKINGUM COUNTY COMMUN…+2 more — $3,500 · PhilanthropyZANESVILLE MUSEUM OF ART — $4,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM ASSOCIATION OF EAST MUSKINGUM — $1,000 · Arts & CultureCAMP PRESMONT INC — $4,000 · ReligionLifeWise Ministries — $500 · ReligionVINCENTIAN OHIO ACTION NETWORK — $1,500 · Human ServicesFOREVERDADS — $100 · Human Services
Education$203,200Other$138,888Philanthropy$115,050Arts & Culture$5,000Religion$4,500Human Services$1,600

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY — $197,200 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetTHE MUSKINGUM COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $111,550 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetGUERNSEY HEALTH SYSTEMS — $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL REVIEW INSTITUTE — $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEAST MUSKINGUM UMBRELLA BOOSTERS — $6,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetZANESVILLE MUSEUM OF ART — $4,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCAMP PRESMONT INC — $4,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR APPALACHIAN OHIO — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRITCHARD LAUGHLIN CIVIC CENTER — $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetVINCENTIAN OHIO ACTION NETWORK — $1,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetMUSEUM ASSOCIATION OF EAST MUSKINGUM — $1,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF MUSKINGUM PERRY AND MORGAN COUNTIES INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA MUSKINGUM VALLEY COUNCIL INC — $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLifeWise Ministries — $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetARTS COUNCIL OF BIG SKY — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOREVERDADS — $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Muskingum County Community FoundationOH17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Muskingum County Community Foundation · J William & Mary Straker Charitable Fdn · Park National Corporation Foundation · Rogge Cora E Memorial Foundation · Debbie and Larry Triplett Foundation · Robert E Fellers and Leona L Fellers Foundation Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Adams Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Adams Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Adams Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph