Skip to content

· Public charity

Ada Regional United Way Inc

Ada regional united way improves lives in our service area by coordinating long-lasting change in health, education, and financial stability.

$106k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$24k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$336kHuman Services$227kYouth Development$171kHealth$84kCrime & Legal$34kCommunity Improvement$16kEducation$15kFood & Nutrition$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $76,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $106,245 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $30,245 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$14,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$408k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ADA HOMELESS SERVICES$24,000
MAMA T'S$14,500
COMPASSION OUTREACH CENTER$14,000
Individual grant recipient$12,000
FAMILY CRISIS CENTER INC$11,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $231k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%FAMILY CRISIS CENTER INC: $25k → 14%FAMILY CRISIS CENTER INC: $20k → 14%FAMILY CRISIS CENTER INC: $19k → 14%FAMILY CRISIS CENTER INC: $19k → 14%FAMILY CRISIS CENTER INC: $19k → 14%ADA SENIOR CARE CENTER: $15k → 14%ADA SENIOR CARE CENTER: $15k → 14%ADA SENIOR CARE CENTER: $15k → 14%ADA SENIOR CARE CENTER: $15k → 14%ADA SENIOR CARE CENTER: $14k → 14%FAMILY CRISIS CENTER INC: $14k → 14%FAMILY CRISIS CENTER INC: $14k → 14%FAMILY CRISIS CENTER INC: $12k → 14%FAMILY CRISIS CENTER INC: $10k → 14%ADA SENIOR CARE CENTER: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$989k · 13 repeat orgs$63k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
7

Total granted

$989k
$63k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+75%
+154%

Still filing today

69%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Housing & ShelterHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalAnimalsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    ADA HOMELESS SERVICES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $205k · revenue +141%
  • FC
    FAMILY CRISIS CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $151k · revenue +75%
  • CO
    COMPASSION OUTREACH CENTER INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $90k · revenue +172%

Funded once

  • EC
    EARLY CHILDHOOD ADVISORY COUNCIL
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • AT
    ABBA'S TABLES INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2021 · $12k · revenue +12%
  • LA
    LEGAL AID SERVICES OF OK
    one grant, 2021 · $9k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northern Okla Youth Services Center & Shelter Inc

Assisting troubled youths and families/local law enforcement

—
2
Good Samaritan of the Ozarks

Good samaritan of the ozarks exists to communicate the love of god, through christ, to the people in our community by meeting their emergency needs.

Human Services
3
Ashtabula Homeless Shelterinc

Provide emergency shelter and meals, case management and assessment to homeless individuals and families from the ashtabula county and surrounding areas.

Housing & Shelter
4
Tulsa Community Service Center Inc

Provide financial and supplement assistance to the tulsa area communities

Human Services
5
Help in Crisis Inc

Our mission is to eliminate family violence, stalking, child abuse, and sexual assault through advocacy, education, counseling, support and prevention services.

Human Services
6
Southeastern Oklahoma Family Services Inc

Provide mental health counseling to needy families and persons in south central Oklahoma

Recreation & Sports
7
Oklahoma Lawyers for Children Inc

To provide legal service and education advocacy for children

Crime & Legal
8
Lab Rescue Ok Inc

To provide community benefit in rescuing abandoned labrador dogs from city kill shelters. our efforts lessen the burden on city-county resources by providing animal care and reduction in overpopulation. we provide citizen education to…

Animals
9
Casa of Western Oklahoma Casa of Western Oklahoma

The organization's mission is to supervise volunteers primarily to serve as court appointed special advocates for abused and neglected children and support the needs of the children served.

Human Services
10
Okmulgee County Humane Society

The Mission Statement for the Okmulgee County Humane Society is to enrich the lives of dogs and cats and provide support to the people who love them when in need - strengthen the overall human-animal bond.

Unclassified
11
Okmulgee County Family Resource Ctr

Crisis intervention services and full shelter for victims and their children of domestic violence/sexual assault. Advocates for abused children in the court system.

Human Services
12
Casa of Tipton County

Child Advocacy Services

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Unity Point Counseling and Resource Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Abba's Tables Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ADA HOMELESS SERVICES INC: $205,200 · Housing & ShelterADA HOMELESS SERVICES INCMAMA TS INC: $86,500 · Housing & ShelterMAMA TS INCUNITY POINT COUNSELING AND RESOURCE CENTER INC: $82,400 · Housing & ShelterUNITY POINT COUNSELING AND RESOURCE CENT…ARBUCKLE AREA COUNCIL-BOYSCOUTS: $68,900 · OtherARBUCKLE AREA COUNCIL-BOYSCOU…THE PONTOTOC COUNTY PEAK INC: $60,700 · OtherTHE PONTOTOC COUNTY PEAK INCIndividual grant recipient: $46,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHARITY TRACKER: $36,000 · OtherCHARITY TRACKERBIG 5 COMMUNITY SERVICES: $16,000 · OtherBIG 5 COMMUNITY SERVICESEARLY CHILDHOOD ADVISORY COUNCIL: $15,000 · OtherEARLY CHILDHOOD ADVISORY COUN…+4 more: $30,000 · Other+4 moreFAMILY CRISIS CENTER INC: $151,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY CRISIS CENTER INCADA SENIOR CARE CENTER INC: $80,450 · Human ServicesADA SENIOR CARE CENTER I…COMPASSION OUTREACH CENTER INC: $90,000 · HealthCOMPASSIO…GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $40,900 · Youth DevelopmentLEGAL AID SERVICES OF OKLAHOMA INC: $25,050 · Crime & LegalABBA'S TABLES INCORPORATED: $12,000 · Food & NutritionPONTOTOC ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY: $5,625 · Animals
Housing & Shelter$374,100Other$272,600Human Services$231,450Health$90,000Youth Development$40,900Crime & Legal$25,050Food & Nutrition$12,000Animals$5,625

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetADA HOMELESS SERVICES INC: $205,200 over 9y, 8.8% of budgetFAMILY CRISIS CENTER INC: $151,000 over 9y, 5.5% of budgetCOMPASSION OUTREACH CENTER INC: $90,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetMAMA TS INC: $86,500 over 6y, 7.5% of budgetUNITY POINT COUNSELING AND RESOURCE CENTER INC: $82,400 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetADA SENIOR CARE CENTER INC: $80,450 over 6y, 5.7% of budgetTHE PONTOTOC COUNTY PEAK INC: $60,700 over 3y, 6.2% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $40,900 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetLEGAL AID SERVICES OF OKLAHOMA INC: $25,050 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetABBA'S TABLES INCORPORATED: $12,000 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetPONTOTOC ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY: $5,625 over 1y, 3.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ADA HOMELESS SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY CRISIS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds COMPASSION OUTREACH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MAMA TS INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITY POINT COUNSELING AND RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ADA SENIOR CARE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PONTOTOC COUNTY PEAK INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds LEGAL AID SERVICES OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds ABBA'S TABLES INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds PONTOTOC ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Cornerstone Equities Charitable TrOK13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Cornerstone Equities Charitable Tr · Valley View Foundation Inc · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ada Regional United Way Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ada Regional United Way Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Legal Aid Services of Oklahoma Inc: 13% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ada Regional United Way’s filings →

More from the funding graph