Skip to content

· Private foundation

Acts of Generosity

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$232k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$32k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$273kArts & Culture$118kCivil Rights$105kHealth$77kPhilanthropy$60kHuman Services$50k
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH CONSORTIUM$32,316
CAMP DREAMCATCHER$30,000
EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANS EQUITY PROJECT$30,000
BERKS COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$20,000
CHESTER COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
JEWISH THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY$18,000
KESHER ISRAEL CONGREGATION$18,000
SAFE BERKS$15,000
CENTER FOR INTEGRATION AND MIGRANT SUPPORT$15,000
YOCUM INSTITUTE FOR ARTS EDUCATION$13,575
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 43% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 8%SAFE BERKS: $15k → 11%DAEMION COUNSELING CENTER: $1k → 6%DAEMION COUNSELING CENTER: $1k → 6%DAEMION COUNSELING CENTER: $1k → 6%DAEMION COUNSELING CENTER: $1k → 6%DAEMION COUNSELING CENTER: $1k → 6%CENTER FOR INTEGRATION AND MIGRANT SUPPORT: $15k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 23% of Acts of Generosity’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 80% of the giving stays in PA; by stated purpose, 56%.

Acts of Generositylessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 24% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$377k · 5 repeat orgs$246k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
5

Total granted

$377k
$124k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+25%

Still filing today

40%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 36% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $122k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JT
    JEWISH THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY OF AMERICA
    8× · 2017–2024 · $137k
  • KI
    KESHER ISRAEL CONGREGATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $137k
  • TY
    THE YOCUM INSTITUTE FOR ARTS EDUCATION INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $69k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • EP
    EPHRATA PERFORMING ARTS CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $46k · revenue +25%
  • LL
    LANCASTERS LGBTQ COALITION
    one grant, 2023 · $45k
  • AD
    ALIANZAS DE PHOENIXVILLEgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +76%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Center for Community Resources Inc

To coordinate services among private and government agencies for specialized populations to ensure service continuity, reduce duplication, and assist individuals and families in accessing appropriate mental health, intellectual…

Health
2
Berks Community Health Center

Berks community health center provides exceptional family-centered primary and preventive healthcare for all residents of berks county, regardless of economic status.

Health
3
Community Counseling Center of Mercer County

To help individuals and families lead healthy and fulfilling lives.

Health
4
Berks Arts Council

The mission of the berks arts council is to inspire, engage and unite our community through arts education, collaboration, and presentation.

Arts & Culture
5
Connections Work

Connections work changes lives and improves communities by providing services and supports to individuals seeking pathways to success.

—
6
Philadelphia Chinatown Development Corporation

The corporation's mission includes, but is not limited to, combatingcommunity deterioration within chinatown; preserving and developingthe chinatown community; leading the community in neighborhoodplanning, considering land use, and…

Community Improvement
7
Children's Aid Society of Mercer County

To provide information, counseling, and such services as may be appropriate to families or others in raising and nuturing children.

—
8
Chambersburg Area Council for the Arts

Support the arts locally through local cultural experiences

Arts & Culture
9
Together for West Philadelphia

Together for West Philadelphia partners with healthcare systems community-based organizations, academic institutions, and public and private stakeholders to achieve equitable health outcomes for West Philadelphians.

Unclassified
10
Penn Hills Library

A welcoming community center that provides information and equitable access to space, collections, materials, programs and services that enrich the quality of life and facilitate lifelong learning.

Education
11
Nami Bucks County Pa

Provide support and education for people with mental health conditions and their families.

Health
12
The Compass Center

Navigating the journey to healing for all affected by sexual, relational, and family trauma.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Maternal and Child Health Consortium of Chester County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Alianzas De Phoenixville. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY OF AMERICA: $136,500 · OtherJEWISH THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY OF AMERICAKESHER ISRAEL CONGREGATION: $136,500 · OtherKESHER ISRAEL CONGREGATIONLANCASTERS LGBTQ COALITION: $45,000 · OtherLANCASTERS LGBTQ COALITIONEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANS EQUITY PROJECT: $30,000 · OtherEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANS EQUITY PROJECTIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientALIANZAS DE PHOENIXVILLE: $20,000 · OtherTHE YOCUM INSTITUTE FOR ARTS EDUCATION INC: $68,575 · Arts & CultureTHE YOCUM INSTITUTE…EPHRATA PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $45,500 · Arts & CultureEPHRATA PERFORMING …+1 more: $3,500 · Arts & CultureMATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH CONSORTIUM OF CHESTER COUNTY INC: $32,316 · HealthMATERNAL AND…CAMP DREAMCATCHER: $30,000 · HealthCAMP DREAMCA…COMPASS MARK: $10,000 · HealthCOMPASS MARKBERKS COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · PhilanthropyBERKS COU…Chester County Community Foundation: $30,000 · PhilanthropyChester C…SAFE BERKS: $15,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR INTEGRATION AND MIGRANT SUPPORT: $15,000 · Human ServicesDAEMION COUNSELING CENTER INC: $5,000 · Human Services
Other$398,000Arts & Culture$117,575Health$72,316Philanthropy$60,000Human Services$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE YOCUM INSTITUTE FOR ARTS EDUCATION INC: $68,575 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetEPHRATA PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $45,500 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetMATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH CONSORTIUM OF CHESTER COUNTY INC: $32,316 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBERKS COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP DREAMCATCHER: $30,000 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetChester County Community Foundation: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALIANZAS DE PHOENIXVILLE: $20,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetSAFE BERKS: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCENTER FOR INTEGRATION AND MIGRANT SUPPORT: $15,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetCOMPASS MARK: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetDAEMION COUNSELING CENTER INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetDEMUTH FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Philadelphia FoundationPA17.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · Chester County Community Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Acts of Generosity funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Acts of Generosity. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Acts of Generosity?

    Find your warmest path to Acts of Generosity through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Acts of Generosity’s filings →

    More from the funding graph