· Private foundation
Achim Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $9k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $141k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $257k
- $250k+1 grant · $644k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KEREN AHAVAS CHESED | $644,200 |
| KEREN MUGEIN IMOISHEYA | $204,000 |
| MACHON BETH MEIR | $53,000 |
| BEER YITZCHOK | $36,200 |
| FRIENDS OF MEOHR BAIS YAAKOV | $30,700 |
| YESHIVA TORAS CHAIM | $28,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $27,200 |
| VARIOUS QUALIFYING ORGANIZATIONS | $18,156 |
| GARDENS JEWISH EXPERIENCE (GJE) | $6,270 |
| CHIZUK HATORAH | $2,340 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 4%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +79% since the first grant, against +67% for those funded once.
22 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $58k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- MBMACHON BETH MEIR2× · 2022–2024 · $163k · revenue +7%
- BBBNOS BAIS YAAKOV OF FAR ROCKAWAY2× · 2017–2020 · $87k · revenue +149%
- ONOHR NAAVA2× · 2017–2022 · $2k · revenue +79%
Funded once
- FOFRIENDS OF BIKUR CHOLIM EZRAT ACHIMone grant, 2023 · $87k · revenue -3%
- PUPROVIDED UPON REQUESTone grant, 2018 · $63k
- CMCHASDEI MESHULAMone grant, 2021 · $36k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.
Maintain communal and charitable affairs in accordance with the tradition of the orthodox jewish faith
To assist the sick and elderly by providing financial support for medical expenses, hot meals for the invalid home-bound, patient advocacy and support, new mother convalescence, patient family support, overnight accomodations for visiting…
publish religious books
The organization provides financial assistance to victims of acts of terrorism in the state of israel.
How this is measured
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Ip Foundation · Cdl Foundation Inc · The Ganger Foundation Inc · The Basch Family Foundation · The Fishoff Family Foundation · The Dennis Berman Family Foundation Inc · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Achim Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Achim Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Achim Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Achim Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Achim’s filings →