Skip to content
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education

Improve health care and population health by assessing and enhancing the quality of resident and fellow physicians' education through advancements in accreditation and education.

$718k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$7.9MCrime & Legal$1.8MEducation$992kScience & Tech$880kRecreation & Sports$150kPhilanthropy$100k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $687,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $717,918 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $30,418 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $350k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$50,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$132M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JOSIAH MACY JR FOUNDATION$300,000
NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES$150,000
NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES$150,000
THE ARNOLD P GOLD FOUNDATION$50,000
NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES$15,000
WEILL CORNELL MEDICINE$7,500
THE INSTITUTE FOR FAMILY HEALTH$7,500
THE REGENTS OF UCLA$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 92% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FEDERATION OF STATE PHYSICIAN HEALTH PROGRAMS INC: $10k → 8%AMERICAN BOARD OF SURGERY INC: $200k → 22%THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN: $71k → 10%THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $10k → 14%UNVIERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $120k → 14%INDIANA UNIVERSITY: $1.5M → 18%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $150k → 14%THE ARNOLD P GOLD FOUNDATION: $50k → 7%OUR LADY OF THE LAKE HOSPITAL INC: $75k → 19%CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $75k → 8%MAINE MEDICAL CENTER: $75k → 7%THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN: $71k → 10%NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $365k → 14%INDIANA UNIVERSITY: $300k → 18%THE ARNOLD P GOLD FOUNDATION: $50k → 7%OUR LADY OF THE LAKE HOSPITAL INC: $75k → 19%CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $75k → 8%MAINE MEDICAL CENTER: $75k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $75k → 14%THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN: $68k → 10%NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $250k → 14%THE ARNOLD P GOLD FOUNDATION: $50k → 7%OUR LADY OF THE LAKE HOSPITAL INC: $74k → 19%CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $75k → 8%MAINE MEDICAL CENTER: $75k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $75k → 14%NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $250k → 14%ACGME INTERNATIONAL GROUP INC: $4.6M → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $75k → 14%JOSIAH MACY JR FOUNDATION: $300k → 17%NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $250k → 14%AMERICAN OSTEPOATHIC ASSOCIATION: $111k → 14%NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $200k → 14%AMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC ASSOCIATION: $15k → 14%MOUNT SINAI DEPT OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE: $40k → 17%NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $150k → 14%UNIV OF CHICAGO MEDICAL CENTER: $75k → 14%MOUNT SINAI DEPT OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE: $35k → 17%NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $150k → 14%UNIV OF CHICAGO MEDICAL CENTER: $75k → 14%NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $150k → 14%UNIV OF CHICAGO MEDICAL CENTER: $75k → 14%NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $150k → 14%NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $75k → 14%NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $50k → 14%NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $15k → 14%NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $15k → 14%NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
WV
MD
NC
DC
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.4M · 43 repeat orgs$5.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +81% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.

43 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 40 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
15

Total granted

$6.4M
$5.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+81%
+30%

Still filing today

33%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $315k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
HealthEducationScience & TechRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +15%
  • UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER
    4× · 2017–2020 · $245k · revenue +81%
  • CN
    CHILDREN'S NATIONAL
    3× · 2017–2019 · $225k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • AI
    ACGME INTERNATIONAL INC
    one grant, 2019 · $4.6M · revenue -27% · 99% of their budget
  • TA
    THE AMERICAN BOARD OF SURGERY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $200k · revenue +105%
  • RO
    REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN
    one grant, 2023 · $120k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
2
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
3
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
4
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
5
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
6
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
7
Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary

THE MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY ("THE INFIRMARY") IS A NOT-FOR-PROFIT TEACHING HOSPITAL CONDUCTING PATIENT CARE AND RESEARCH. THE INFIRMARY IS A TEACHING HOSPITAL OF HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL AND AN INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH.…

Health
8
Washington University

The washington university is a co-educational, nondenominational university with a long and distinguished history of teaching, research and (cont'd on schedule o)

Education
9
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
10
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Morehouse School of Medicine; the most unlike its peers is Josiah Macy Jr Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
22/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ACGME INTERNATIONAL INC: $4,608,523 · HealthACGME INTERNATIONAL INCCHILDREN'S NATIONAL: $225,000 · HealthMaineHealth: $225,000 · HealthUniversity of Chicago Medical Center: $225,000 · HealthOur Lady of the Lake Hospital Inc: $223,500 · Health+8 more: $189,477 · HealthIndiana University School of Medicine: $1,800,000 · OtherIndiana University School of Medi…JOSIAH MACY JR FOUNDATION: $300,000 · OtherJOSIAH MACY JR FOUNDATIONTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $245,000 · OtherTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC EDUCATIONAL …UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO: $225,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRAN…UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS: $210,103 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXASTHE AMERICAN BOARD OF SURGERY INC: $200,000 · OtherTHE AMERICAN BOARD OF SURGERY INCTHE ARNOLD P GOLD FOUNDATION: $150,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $120,000 · Other+31 more: $286,500 · Other+31 moreNATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $2,085,000 · Science & TechNATIONAL ACADEMY OF…UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $244,633 · EducationICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $75,000 · Education+6 more: $40,000 · EducationNorthwestern University: $177,769 · Recreation & Sports
Health$5,696,500Other$3,536,603Science & Tech$2,085,000Education$359,633Recreation & Sports$177,769

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetACGME INTERNATIONAL INC: $4,608,523 over 1y, 99% of budgetNATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $2,085,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetJOSIAH MACY JR FOUNDATION: $300,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $244,633 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S NATIONAL: $225,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMaineHealth: $225,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago Medical Center: $225,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOur Lady of the Lake Hospital Inc: $223,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN BOARD OF SURGERY INC: $200,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetNorthwestern University: $177,769 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC ASSOCIATION: $111,477 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $75,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Christ Hospital: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWELLSPAN HEALTH: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $13,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe George Washington University: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFEDERATION OF STATE PHYSICIAN HEALTH PROGRAMS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetHENRY M JACKSON FOUNDATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MILITARY MEDICINE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INSTITUTE FOR FAMILY HEALTH: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL CENTER FUND INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEmory University: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ACGME INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds JOSIAH MACY JR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S NATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds MaineHealth ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds Our Lady of the Lake Hospital Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN BOARD OF SURGERY INC ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI ↗
  • Who funds The Christ Hospital ↗
  • Who funds WELLSPAN HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds The George Washington University ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds MOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA3.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 100%
  • Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine: 100% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home