How much does Abrams Ramat Gan Foundation give?

Abrams Ramat Gan Foundation reported 2 grants totaling $37,167 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 15 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2023.

What does Abrams Ramat Gan Foundation fund?

By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2024, its largest causes are Religion (49%), Health (47%), Human Services (1%).

Who are Abrams Ramat Gan Foundation's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2019 to FY2024: Jewish Family Service ($63k), Jewish Community Relations Council of San Francisco Marin & Peninsula ($60k), Jewish Community Center of the East Bay ($39k).

Does Abrams Ramat Gan Foundation fund new organizations?

In FY2023, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Does Abrams Ramat Gan Foundation accept unsolicited applications?

Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

Which funders back the same organizations as Abrams Ramat Gan Foundation?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc, Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, Amazonsmile Foundation.

Where is Abrams Ramat Gan Foundation based?

Abrams Ramat Gan Foundation is based in CA.

Abrams Ramat Gan Foundation

Abrams Ramat Gan Foundation at a glance Mostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Private foundation

Abrams Ramat Gan Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$37k

Granted FY2024still arriving

Grants FY2024still arriving

States reached

$37k

Largest

01What it funds

0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Religion$4.2MHealth$4.1MHuman Services$122kInternational$77kCivil Rights$70kYouth Development$15kCommunity Improvement$15kFood & Nutrition$10kOther$0

02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k1 grant · $116
$10k–50k1 grant · $37k

$37,051

Median grant

States reached

$31

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
ISAAC GEORGIA ABRAMS FAMILY FOUNDAT	$37,051
NAT AND GEORGIA ABRAMS FAMILY FOUND	$116

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–21, $102k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 38% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$8.6M · 14 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$8.6M

$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%

+55%

Still filing today

50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesPhilanthropyInternationalCommunity ImprovementOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

JF
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE
3× · 2019–2021 · $63k · revenue +121%
JC
JEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF SAN FRANCISCO MARIN & PENINSULA
3× · 2019–2021 · $60k · revenue +22%
JC
JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF THE EAST BAY
3× · 2019–2021 · $39k · revenue +584%

Funded once

AF
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF OGEN INCgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue ×11
AD
ANTI DEFAMATION LEAGUE-SANTA BARBAR
one grant, 2021 · $10k
JV
JEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICE
one grant, 2021 · $10k

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Eastern European Jewish Heritage Foundation

Philanthropy

Jewish Life Foundation

—

University of Judaism Foundation

—

The Bnai Jacob Foundation

—

The Jerusalem Connection

—

Foundation for Conservative Judiasm of South Florida

—

National Council of Jewish Women Inc Jersey Hills Section

—

Jewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago

Juf provides critical resources that bring food, refuge, health care, education and emergency assistance to over 500,000 chicagoans of all faiths and millions of jews in israel and around the world, funding a network of 100+ agencies,…

Philanthropy

The Steinhardt Foundation for Jewish Life Inc

Religion

The Jewish Foundation of Cincinnati

Philanthropy

The Jewish Community Foundation Charitable Fund

—

The Afghan Jewish Foundation Inc

—

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Funders Network; the most unlike its peers is Santa Barbara Hillel. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

11/11

Grantees still filing

8/11

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Other$8,427,138Human Services$102,000Philanthropy$90,000International$22,000Community Improvement$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO7.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Abrams Ramat Gan Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Abrams Ramat Gan Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Abrams Ramat Gan Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Abrams Ramat Gan Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

Play a game based on Abrams Ramat Gan’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home