Skip to content

· Private foundation

A John and Barbara a Hauptli Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$34k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$197kReligion$53kAnimals$28kArts & Culture$16kHuman Services$13kFood & Nutrition$10kHealth$10kCommunity Improvement$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$888k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JOHNS LUTHERAN CHURCH$10,000
JUST FOOD$5,000
O'CONNELL CHILDREN'S SHELTER$2,000
SUNRISE PROJECT$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
LAWRENCE HUMANE SOCIETY$2,000
MAKE A WISH$2,000
OPERATION WILDLIFE$2,000
VAN GO ARTS$2,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB LAWRENCE$1,000
BERT NASH COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH$1,000
THEATRE SALINA$1,000
THEATRE LAWRENCE$1,000
ST JUDES CANCER CENTER$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MAKE A WISH: $2k → 11%ST JUDES CANCER CENTER: $2k → 11%OPERATION WILDLIFE: $2k → 10%KANSAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $52k → 13%SHY 38 INC: $10k → 15%MAKE A WISH: $2k → 11%ST JUDES CANCER CENTER: $1k → 11%SMILE TRAIN: $2k → 17%OPERATION WILDLIFE: $2k → 10%KANSAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $25k → 13%SHY 38 INC: $9k → 15%SMILE TRAIN: $1k → 17%KANSAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $25k → 13%VAN GO ARTS: $2k → 15%KANSAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $25k → 13%SUNRISE PROJECT: $2k → 15%KANSAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $21k → 13%VAN GO ARTS: $2k → 15%KANSAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $20k → 13%DOUGLAS CO CASA: $2k → 15%KANSAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $20k → 13%DOUGLAS CO CASA: $2k → 15%ST JOHNS LUTHERAN CHURCH: $10k → 13%SUNRISE PROJECT: $2k → 15%ST JOHNS LUTHERAN CHURCH: $10k → 13%VFW POST 852: $2k → 15%ST JOHNS LUTHERAN CHURCH: $6k → 13%SUNRISE PROJECT: $1k → 15%ST JOHNS LUTHERAN CHURCH: $5k → 13%BERT NASH COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH: $1k → 15%ST JOHNS LUTHERAN CHURCH: $5k → 13%BISHOP SEABURY ACADEMY: $5k → 15%ST JOHNS LUTHERAN CHURCH: $4k → 13%BISHOP SEABURY ACADEMY: $4k → 15%ST JOHNS LUTHERAN CHURCH: $4k → 13%JUST FOOD: $5k → 15%ST JOHNS LUTHERAN CHURCH: $4k → 13%JUST FOOD: $5k → 15%ST JOHNS LUTHERAN CHURCH: $3k → 13%O'CONNELL CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $2k → 15%SALVATION ARMY: $3k → 13%LAWRENCE HUMANE SOCIETY: $2k → 15%SALVATION ARMY: $2k → 13%O'CONNELL CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $2k → 15%THEATRE SALINA: $1k → 13%LAWRENCE HUMANE SOCIETY: $2k → 15%SALINA COMMUNITY THEATER: $1k → 13%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB LAWRENCE: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$338k · 23 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
6

Total granted

$338k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+15%

Still filing today

48%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureAnimalsYouth DevelopmentEducationRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KW
    KANSAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2017–2023 · $188k · revenue +74%
  • JF
    JUST FOOD OF DOUGLAS COUNTY KS INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $10k · revenue +6%
  • BS
    BISHOP SEABURY ACADEMY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $10k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • VP
    VFW POST 852
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $500
  • KR
    KANSAS RUGBY FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $400 · revenue +15%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lawrence Community Shelter Inc

The lawrence community shelter is the only emergency homeless shelter serving lawrence and douglas county in kansas. our mission is to provide a safe shelter and comprehensive services and programs in order to set people experiencing or at…

Housing & Shelter
2
Kansas Humane Society of Wichita Kansas

The kansas humane society is a community resource for pets and people, dedicated to enhancing the welfare of all companion animals.

Animals
3
Lawrence Farmers Market

The mission of the Lawrence Farmers Market is to provide children and adults in the Lawrence, KS area, with locally grown foods and farm products. This will be accomplished by improving access to local, healthy, affordable food through a…

Religion
4
Lawrence Meals On Wheels Inc

Lawrence meals on wheels' mission has always been to provide food service for the aged, convalescent and/or disabled residing in lawrence, kansas, regardless of race, color or creed, in order to remain independent in their own homes as…

Food & Nutrition
5
Beatrice Humane Society Inc

To shelter, protect, and place lost and homeless companion animals in gage county and to be an educational resource

Animals
6
Lawrence County Humane Society

To provide protection for homeless animals, intervene for animals in abusive situations and to educate the community about animal population.

Animals
7
Lawrence County Humane Society

None

Animals
8
Chamber of Commerce of Lawrence Kansas

Promote growth and economic prosperity by serving as the leading business advocate, cultivating leadership and facilitating connectivity.

—
9
The Lawrence Foundation
—
10
Juneau Animal Rescue

To serve our community by promoting animal welfare and strengthening the animal-human bond. to improve the lives of pets through education and protection. to shelter stray, abandoned, and surrendered pets and find them loving homes.

Animals
11
Lawrence County Independent Schools

The mission of lawrence county independent schools (lcis) is to inspire each student to reach his or her greatest potential personally and academically in a peaceful rural school learning environment by providing a challenging and a…

Education
12
William Lawrence and Blanche Hughes Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lawrence Humane Society; the most unlike its peers is International Fellowship of Christians & Jews Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KANSAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $187,868 · EducationKANSAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITYST JOHNS LUTHERAN CHURCH: $51,050 · OtherST JOHNS LUTHERAN CHURCHSHY 38 INC: $19,183 · OtherSHY 38 INCJUST FOOD OF DOUGLAS COUNTY KS INC: $10,480 · OtherJUST FOOD OF DOUGLAS COUNTY KS INCBISHOP SEABURY ACADEMY: $9,625 · OtherBISHOP SEABURY ACADEMYSMILE TRAIN INC: $6,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY: $5,000 · Other+15 more: $23,075 · Other+15 moreTHEATRE LAWRENCE INC: $8,000 · Arts & CultureSALINA COMMUNITY THEATRE ASSOCIATION: $2,000 · Arts & CultureLAWRENCE HUMANE SOCIETY: $5,000 · AnimalsOPERATION WILDLIFE INC: $4,000 · AnimalsLAWRENCE COMMUNITY FOOD ALLIANCE INC: $5,000 · Food & NutritionOCONNELL CHILDRENS SHELTER INC: $4,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LAWRENCE INC: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE BERT NASH COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC: $1,000 · HealthKANSAS RUGBY FOUNDATION INC: $400 · Recreation & Sports
Education$187,868Other$124,413Arts & Culture$10,000Animals$9,000Food & Nutrition$5,000Youth Development$5,000Health$1,000Recreation & Sports$400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKANSAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $187,868 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetJUST FOOD OF DOUGLAS COUNTY KS INC: $10,480 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBISHOP SEABURY ACADEMY: $9,625 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHEATRE LAWRENCE INC: $8,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $6,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLAWRENCE COMMUNITY FOOD ALLIANCE INC: $5,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetLAWRENCE HUMANE SOCIETY: $5,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOCONNELL CHILDRENS SHELTER INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetOPERATION WILDLIFE INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSALINA COMMUNITY THEATRE ASSOCIATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KANSAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds JUST FOOD OF DOUGLAS COUNTY KS INC ↗
  • Who funds BISHOP SEABURY ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds THEATRE LAWRENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds LAWRENCE COMMUNITY FOOD ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds LAWRENCE HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds OCONNELL CHILDRENS SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION WILDLIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds SALINA COMMUNITY THEATRE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LAWRENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BERT NASH COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS RUGBY FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Douglas County Community FoundationKS24.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Douglas County Community Foundation · Kriz Charitable Fund Inc · Midcontinent Foundation · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Topeka Community Foundation · Kansas Health Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization A John and Barbara a Hauptli Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from A John and Barbara a Hauptli Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on A John and Barbara a Hauptli’s filings →

    More from the funding graph