Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

A Greater Cause Foundation

The A GREATER CAUSE FOUNDATION (agc) is dedicated to providing support grants to other 501(c)(3) organizations that fulfill scholarship, leadership, fellowship, and service.

$488k
Granted FY2020
6
Grants FY2020
5
States reached
$120k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172020.

Human Services$623kPublic Benefit$320kEducation$250kHousing & Shelter$131kArts & Culture$35kPublic Safety & Disaster$25k
02FY2020 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2020

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $78k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $410k
$100,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VETERANS MOVING FORWARD INC$120,000
SEAL LEGACY FOUNDATION INC$120,000
VETERAN SUCCESS RESOURCE GROUP$100,000
HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC$70,000
CATCH A LIFT FUND$40,000
WARRIORS & QUIET WATERS FOUNDATION$38,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $585k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 13% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS OF NEW MEXICO: $25k → 14%VETERANS RESOURCE GROUP: $50k → 11%360 VETERANS: $50k → 4%VETERAN SUCCESS RESOURCE GROUP: $100k → 6%VETERANS MOVING FORWARD: $40k → 7%VETERANS MOVING FORWARD INC: $120k → 4%360 VETERANS: $50k → 6%VETERANS MOVING FORWARD INC: $75k → 4%VETERANS MOVING FORWARD INC: $75k → 4%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MT
ND
MA
CA
VA
MD
NM
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 5 repeat orgs$213k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +134% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2020, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
4

Total granted

$1.2M
$135k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+134%
+5%

Still filing today

80%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $78k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
Human ServicesPublic BenefitArts & CultureHousing & ShelterHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VM
    VETERANS MOVING FORWARD INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $310k · revenue +134% · 57% of their budget
  • SL
    Seal Legacy Foundation Inc
    4× · 2017–2020 · $280k · revenue +74%
  • KS
    KAPPA SIGMA ENDOWMENT FUND
    2× · 2017–2018 · $250k · revenue +285%

Funded once

  • VR
    VETERANS RESOURCE GROUP
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • SE
    SHEP-TY EMBRACE GAME CHANGER
    one grant, 2017 · $35k · revenue +5% · 27% of their budget
  • TN
    TEXAS NATIONAL GUARD FAMILY SUPPORT FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue -12%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Homes for Heroes Foundation
Housing & Shelter
2
Texas Wounded Warriors

The mission of the texas wounded warrior foundation is to raise awareness, to honor, and to empower our wounded united state military warriors, enabling them to assimilate back to daily life upon their return from combat. we seek to…

Public Benefit
3
3-8 Oif & Oef Veterans Foundation
4
Support Our Soldiers

Provide financial support for veterans.

Human Services
5
For Veterans Sake Foundation

For veteran's sake foundation is here to provide an alternative solution to dealing with pts (post traumatic stress). we use a combination of a (non-therapeutic) neuro-traumatic resourcing, service dogs and consulting. working with the…

Health
6
Lead the Way Fund Inc

Army ranger lead the way fund is an active duty, casualty assistance, recovery, transition and veterans organization that provides financial support to u.s. army rangers and the families of those who have died, have been disabled or who…

Human Services
7
American Heroes Foundation

Raises funds and provides support to military veteran and first responder organizations, focusing on their physical, mental, and emotional well-being

Human Services
8
Warriors Fund

Support those in need

Human Services
9
Warfighter Outfitters

Warfighter Outfitters believe in the healing power of the outdoors. Since 2014, we have provided free fishing, hunting, and engagement trips to disabled veterans. On the water or in the woods, these veteran-only trips help service men and…

10
Warrior Legacy Foundation

Providing assistance to wounded military

Arts & Culture
11
Quick Reaction Foundation

Quick reaction foundation (qrf) is a non-profit organization founded by veterans to provide rapid response to the developing needs of elite operators and their families from within select u.s. special operations command ("ussocom") teams.…

Public Benefit
12
Tragedy Assistance Program for Survivors Inc

The tragedy assistance program for survivors (taps) is america's national nonprofit organization that has cared for the loved ones of our nation's fallen heroes since 1994. taps ensures these living legacies of service and sacrifice do not…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Veterans Moving Forward Inc and the most unlike its peers is Shep-Ty Embrace Game Changer. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VETERANS MOVING FORWARD INC — $310,000 · Human ServicesVETERANS MOVING FORWARD INC360 VETERANS — $200,000 · Human Services360 VETERANSVETERANS RESOURCE GROUP — $50,000 · Human ServicesVETERANS RESOURCE GROUPAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $25,000 · Human ServicesSeal Legacy Foundation Inc — $280,000 · Public BenefitSeal Legacy Foundation IncCHRISTOPHER COFFLAND MEMORIAL FUND INC — $40,000 · Public BenefitCHRISTOPHER COFFLAND MEMORIA…TEXAS NATIONAL GUARD FAMILY SUPPORT FOUNDATION — $25,000 · Public BenefitTEXAS NATIONAL GUARD FAMILY …KAPPA SIGMA ENDOWMENT FUND — $250,000 · OtherKAPPA SIGMA ENDOWMEN…HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC — $131,334 · Housing & ShelterHOMES FOR …WARRIORS & QUIET WATERS FOUNDATION INC — $38,000 · HealthSHEP-TY EMBRACE GAME CHANGER — $35,000 · Arts & Culture
Human Services$585,000Public Benefit$345,000Other$250,000Housing & Shelter$131,334Health$38,000Arts & Culture$35,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetVETERANS MOVING FORWARD INC — $310,000 over 4y, 57% of budgetSeal Legacy Foundation Inc — $280,000 over 4y, 6.6% of budgetKAPPA SIGMA ENDOWMENT FUND — $250,000 over 2y, 8.4% of budget360 VETERANS — $200,000 over 3y, 95% of budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC — $131,334 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCHRISTOPHER COFFLAND MEMORIAL FUND INC — $40,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetWARRIORS & QUIET WATERS FOUNDATION INC — $38,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSHEP-TY EMBRACE GAME CHANGER — $35,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetTEXAS NATIONAL GUARD FAMILY SUPPORT FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodDC10.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization A Greater Cause Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to A Greater Cause Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to A Greater Cause Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2021) is on record and reports $3k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2020, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph