Skip to content

· Private foundation

689 Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$16k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$12kRecreation & Sports$12kArts & Culture$8kHousing & Shelter$6kPhilanthropy$6kEducation$2kFood & Nutrition$2kEnvironment$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$520
Median grant
10
States reached
$72k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHURCH OF GLADTIDINGS$2,047
GOFUND ME SUPPORT$2,000
UNDER THE SHIELD$1,090
MARINE CORPS LAW ENFORCEMENT$1,037
Individual grant recipient$1,030
CENTER FOR EVALU$1,023
VENTURE TOGETHER NANUET NY$1,000
ECLC FOUNDATION OF CHATHAM$812
AMERICAS GROW A ROW$529
TUNNELS TO TOWERS$525
SHRINERS CHILDREN HOSPITAL$520
Individual grant recipient$518
CALVARY FUND INC BRONX$518
SPECIAL OPERATORS TRANSITION FOUNDA$518
TABLE TO TABLE HASBROUCK$510
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 24% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SOUTHWEST KEY PROGRAMS: $500 → 10%CHILDREN IN CRISIS: $518 → 8%AMERICAS GROW A ROW: $529 → 4%AMERICAS GROW A ROW: $500 → 4%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
OR
NJ
CA
MO
VA
MD
AZ
SC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$44k · 15 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
14

Total granted

$44k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
0%

Still filing today

53%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 17% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HS
    HOMELESS SOLUTIONS INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $6k · revenue +101%
  • NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $4k · revenue +26%
  • UT
    Under the Shield
    3× · 2023–2025 · $2k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • GARY SINISE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +47%
  • VI
    VETS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
  • CI
    CHILDREN IN CRISIS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $518 · revenue -4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

—
2
Tragedy Assistance Program for Survivors Inc

The tragedy assistance program for survivors (taps) is america's national nonprofit organization that has cared for the loved ones of our nation's fallen heroes since 1994. taps ensures these living legacies of service and sacrifice do not…

Health
3
Special Ops Survivors

Special ops survivors advances the mission "to embrace and empower surviving spouses of fallen special operations heroes to build healthy post-loss futures as they transition and rebuild their new lives." the foundation provides programs…

Human Services
4
Frontline to Field Foundation

Frontline to field is a nonprofit organization founded from the hearts of two individuals deeply committed to the well-being of those who serve and sacrifice for others. inspired by their personal connections to the military, first…

Recreation & Sports
5
Head Strong Project Inc

The head strong project (headstrong) is a non-profit organization founded in 2012 that provides barrier-free, stigma-free ptsd treatment to veterans, transitioning service members, and family members connected to their care.

Health
6
The Veterans and First Responders
Human Services
7
Building Homes for Heroes Inc

Building homes for heroes is determined and devoted to bringing renewed hope to our nation's injured veterans, first responders and their families. the organization builds or modifies homes, and gifts them, mortgage-free, to injured…

Housing & Shelter
8
Homes for Heroes Foundation
Housing & Shelter
9
Wounded Warrior Project Inc

Wounded warrior project (wwp) is the nation's leading veterans service organization, focused on the total well-being of post - 9/11 veterans, active-duty service members, and their families. our programs, advocacy, and awareness efforts…

Human Services
10
Wounded Spirits Ministries

The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…

Recreation & Sports
11
Robert Irvine Foundation Inc

The robert irvine foundation is a not-for-profit entity and is tax exempt under 501(c) (3) of the internal revenue code (irc). the organization supports and strengthens the physical and mental well-being of our service members, veterans,…

Human Services
12
Shield of Faith Missions

Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tim Tebow Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cultural Arts Alliance of Walton County Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
10/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOMELESS SOLUTIONS INC: $6,000 · OtherHOMELESS SOLUTIONS INCIndividual grant recipient: $3,815 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHURCH OF GLAD TIDINGS: $2,047 · OtherCHURCH OF GLAD TIDINGSGOFUND ME SUPPORT: $2,000 · OtherGOFUND ME SUPPORTVETS INC: $1,575 · OtherFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $1,513 · Other+29 more: $17,055 · Other+29 moreHAPPINESS IS CAMPING: $11,530 · Recreation & SportsHAPPINESS IS CAMPINGELDERHEART INC: $4,030 · Arts & CultureELDERHEART INCNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 · Arts & CultureNAVY SEAL FOUN…Cultural Arts Alliance of Walton County Inc: $500 · Arts & CultureCultural Arts …Under the Shield: $2,090 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $1,575 · EducationOPERATION RED WINGS FOUNDATION: $3,000 · EmploymentGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $2,015 · PhilanthropyTIM TEBOW FOUNDATION INC: $514 · PhilanthropyAmericas Grow-A-Row: $1,029 · Human ServicesCHILDREN IN CRISIS INC: $518 · Human ServicesSOUTHWEST KEY PROGRAMS INC: $500 · Human Services
Other$34,005Recreation & Sports$11,530Arts & Culture$8,530Education$3,665Employment$3,000Philanthropy$2,529Human Services$2,047

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHAPPINESS IS CAMPING: $11,530 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetHOMELESS SOLUTIONS INC: $6,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetELDERHEART INC: $4,030 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION RED WINGS FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUnder the Shield: $2,090 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $2,015 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $1,575 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $1,513 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmericas Grow-A-Row: $1,029 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN IN CRISIS INC: $518 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTIM TEBOW FOUNDATION INC: $514 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCultural Arts Alliance of Walton County Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWEST KEY PROGRAMS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRESCUE 22 FOUNDATION INC: $208 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HAPPINESS IS CAMPING ↗
  • Who funds HOMELESS SOLUTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds ELDERHEART INC ↗
  • Who funds NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION RED WINGS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Under the Shield ↗
  • Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Americas Grow-A-Row ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN IN CRISIS INC ↗
  • Who funds TIM TEBOW FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Cultural Arts Alliance of Walton County Inc ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST KEY PROGRAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC9.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization 689 Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from 689 Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Homeless Solutions Inc: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on 689’s filings →

More from the funding graph