Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

4atx Foundation

4ATX FOUNDATION uses the power of soccer to help communities thrive - socially, emotionally and physically.

$440k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Recreation & Sports$587kHousing & Shelter$500kFood & Nutrition$69k
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 3 grants below total $225,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $440,144 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $215,144 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $200k
$100,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOCCER ASSIST$100,000
STREET SOCCER USA INC$100,000
US SOCCER FEDERATION$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $105k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%STREET SOCCER USA INC: $100k → 20%AUSTIN AREA URBAN LEAGUE: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Usc - United Soccer Clubs

The mission of the United Soccer Clubs (USC) is to provide an exceptional platform for youth soccer in South Texas. We aim to elevate the game of soccer by fostering player, coach, and referee development, promoting parent education,…

Recreation & Sports
2
Texas Premier Soccer Club

Texas Premier Soccer Club is a nonprofit organization committed to providing affordable, high-level soccer training and competitive opportunities for youth players through coaching, league play, tournaments, camps, and community-based…

Recreation & Sports
3
United States Adult Soccer Association

The organization develops, promotes, and administers the game of soccer among players, men and women, within the u.s. the association fosters national and international amateur competition and develops amateur athletes for national and…

4
Westlake Youth Soccer Association

FC Westlake (WYSA) is committed to being the premier destination for families and players. WYSA's mission is to develop each player to be the best they can be, both on and off the field. WYSA provides a supportive environment where…

5
South Texas Youth Soccer Association Texas Unitted Fc

To provide underprivileged children the opportunity to participate in a lower cost, affordable, soccer program.

Youth Development
6
South Texas Youth Soccer Association

Soccer education, training, and competition.

Recreation & Sports
7
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
8
Arizona Soccer Club United Inc

Dedicated to the development of youth in soccer, providing opportunities to promote healthy living, good sportsmanship, and leadership skills through athletics and most importantly, encouraging our players to use soccer as a vehicle to…

Recreation & Sports
9
Youth Soccer Club of Montgomery County Inc Dba Htx Soccer Inc

Providing youth soccer opportunities for all levels in the greater Houston community.

10
Austin Street Center

The mission of austin street center is to provide emergency shelter and related services to the homeless. programs provide crisis intervention, substance abuse awareness information and opportunities to improve present life situations to…

11
Carolina Youth Soccer Association

To provide all families a positive, healthy, progressive environment for youth development through soccer in our community.

Youth Development
12
Somos Unidos Foundation

The somos unidos foundation is a 501(c)(3) dedicated to creating positive outcomes for new mexicans through art, sport, community, and unity. our high performance and academy programs epitomize our devotion to the future a cost-free…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United States Soccer Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Austin Area Urban League. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FOUNDATION COMMUNITIES INC — $500,000 · Housing & ShelterFOUNDATION COMMUNITIES INCUNITED STATES SOCCER FOUNDATION INC — $280,000 · Recreation & SportsUNITED STATES SOCCER FOUNDATION INCSOCCER ASSIST — $100,000 · Recreation & SportsSOCCER ASSISTLONESTAR SOCCER CLUB OF AUSTIN INC — $45,000 · Recreation & SportsLONESTAR SOCCER CLUB OF AUSTIN INCSTREET SOCCER USA INC — $100,000 · Human ServicesSTREET SOC…Austin Area Urban League — $5,258 · Human ServicesCentral Texas Food Bank Inc — $68,500 · Food & NutritionAUSTIN UPPER NINETY INC — $25,000 · OtherCAPITOL AREA YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION — $21,565 · OtherTREE CITY YOUTH SOCCER — $10,000 · Other
Housing & Shelter$500,000Recreation & Sports$425,000Human Services$105,258Food & Nutrition$68,500Other$56,565

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFOUNDATION COMMUNITIES INC — $500,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetUNITED STATES SOCCER FOUNDATION INC — $280,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetSTREET SOCCER USA INC — $100,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetSOCCER ASSIST — $100,000 over 1y, 77% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc — $68,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLONESTAR SOCCER CLUB OF AUSTIN INC — $45,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAUSTIN UPPER NINETY INC — $25,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetAustin Area Urban League — $5,258 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dick's Sporting Goods FoundationPA13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dick's Sporting Goods Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization 4atx Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph