Loading…
· Public charity
4ATX FOUNDATION
4ATX FOUNDATION uses the power of soccer to help communities thrive - socially, emotionally and physically.
$440k
Granted FY2024
3
Grants
3
Communities
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2019–2024.
Housing & Shelter$500kRecreation & Sports$425kHuman Services$105kFood & Nutrition$69kOther$57k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2019
youth
2020
sportfood
2021
—
2022
scholarshipsplayers
2023
austin
2024
mini-pitch partnershippartnership verdeverde pitch
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 3 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $200k
$100,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
- SOCCER ASSIST$100,000
- STREET SOCCER USA INC$100,000
- US SOCCER FEDERATION$25,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $105k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19% — the area typically sits at 13%. 95% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
United States Soccer Federation
To promote and govern soccer in the united states in order to make it the preeminent sport.
Recreation & Sports
2
Usc - United Soccer Clubs
The mission of the United Soccer Clubs (USC) is to provide an exceptional platform for youth soccer in South Texas. We aim to elevate the game of soccer by fostering player, coach, and referee development, promoting parent education,…
Recreation & Sports
3
Leander Youth Soccer Assoc
Youth low cost soccer opportunities.
Recreation & Sports
4
North Texas State Soccer Association
To foster and advance the cause of soccer within the north texas area and to plan, establish, approve and administer all rules and regulations.
Recreation & Sports
5
Twin Cities Street Soccer Usa
Free soccer leaque and community welfare organizationthat serves youth refugees and under privileged by providingyear around youth development programs
Recreation & Sports
6
The Junior League of Austin Inc
The junior league of austin is an organization of women whose mission is to advance women's leadership for meaningful community impact through volunteer action, collaboration, and training.
Community Improvement
7
Weatherford Soccer Club Inc
Recreation & Sports
8
Austin Community Foundation Inc
We mobilize ideas and resources to strengthen central texas.
Philanthropy
9
Stafford Area Soccer Association Inc
Operation of recreational youth soccer league.
Recreation & Sports
10
Capital Area Soccer League Inc
To provide positive and high quality soccer opportunities at all levels of play for youth and their families and to serve as a valuable community partner.
—
11
Las Vegas Soccer Association
The mission of Las Vegas Soccer Association is to develop well-balanced, successful student athletes in a healthy, positive soccer environment. We will promote and develop excellence in club soccer based on the values of skill,…
Recreation & Sports
12
South Texas Youth Soccer Association Texas Unitted Fc
To provide underprivileged children the opportunity to participate in a lower cost, affordable soccer program. Our registration fees are kept to a minimum to cover costs of association fees, referee fees, field maintenance, and other…
Youth Development
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lonestar Soccer Club of Austin Inc and the most unlike its peers is Foundation Communities Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Housing & Shelter$500,000Recreation & Sports$425,000Human Services$105,258Food & Nutrition$68,500Other$56,565
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Austin Community Foundation IncTX13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Austin Community Foundation Inc · Dick's Sporting Goods Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation 4ATX FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: SOCCER ASSIST.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~10 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 3.7× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 472922753 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on SOCCER ASSIST, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 10 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 77% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to 4atx Foundation?
Find your warmest path to 4atx Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines