Skip to content

· Private foundation

455 Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$22k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$70kEducation$41kAnimals$30kArts & Culture$26kPhilanthropy$18kReligion$13kHousing & Shelter$11kScience & Tech$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$478k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Feeding America$10,000
Doctors without borders$3,000
Chabad of Topanga$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Campanille Foundation$2,000
Ruskin Theatre Group$1,000
Sierra Club$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–19, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Downtown Women's Center: $1k → 14%San Fernando Valley Refugee Childre: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NY
CA
UT
VA
MD
AZ
NC
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$178k · 14 repeat orgs$58k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +52% since the first grant, against +44% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
16

Total granted

$178k
$51k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+44%

Still filing today

43%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationAnimalsArts & CultureHuman ServicesFood & NutritionReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Feeding America
    6× · 2018–2024 · $70k · revenue +77%
  • TP
    THE PLANETARY SOCIETY
    3× · 2018–2022 · $10k · revenue +52%
  • FL
    FULL-CIRCLE LEARNING INC
    4× · 2018–2022 · $9k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • GP
    GEFFEN PLAYHOUSE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $14k · revenue +33%
  • HH
    HollyHock House
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • KN
    KIDS NEED TO READ
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -48%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
2
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
3
Council On Foreign Relations Inc

The council on foreign relations (cfr) is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher dedicated to being a resource for its members, government officials, business executives, journalists, educators and…

International
4
Pomona College

Throughout its history, pomona college has educated men and women of exceptional promise. we gather individuals, regardless of financial circumstances, into a small residential community that is strongly rooted in southern california yet…

Education
5
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
6
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
7
Lowell Observatory

The mission of lowell observatory is to pursue the study of astronomy, especially the study of our solar system and its evolution; to conduct pure research in astronomical phenomena; and to maintain quality public education and outreach…

Science & Tech
8
The Adler Planetarium

The adler planetarium ('adler') is a not-for-profit cultural institution whose mission is to connect people to the universe and each other under the sky we all share. it aspires to be the world's premier center for engaging in astronomy…

Arts & Culture
9
The Scripps Research Institute

The scripps research institute ("tsri") performs high impact basic biomedical research, improves the human condition by fostering translation of its discoveries into useful products and engages in the highest quality graduate scientific…

Health
10
Techsoup Global

Techsoup's mission is to build a dynamic bridge that leverages technology to enable connections and innovative solutions for a more equitable planet.

—
11
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
12
Future Problem Solving Program International Inc

Future problem solving proudly celebrates more than 50 years of placing close to a million young people at the core of a dynamic, purposeful learning experience. each year k-12 students from around the world participate in a variety of…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wikimedia Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Feeding America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SCBWI: $17,500 · OtherSCBWIWomen for Women: $15,000 · OtherWomen for WomenCHABAD OF TOPANGA INC: $10,650 · OtherCHABAD OF TOPANGA INCHollyHock House: $10,000 · OtherHollyHock HouseFULL-CIRCLE LEARNING INC: $9,000 · OtherFULL-CIRCLE LEARNING INCTheatricum Botanicum: $4,500 · OtherVermont College of the Arts: $3,000 · Other+15 more: $19,650 · Other+15 moreFeeding America: $70,000 · Food & NutritionFeeding AmericaTopanga Animal Rescue: $28,500 · AnimalsTopanga Anima…SAVING HARBIN DOGS INC: $1,000 · AnimalsTHE CAMPANILE FOUNDATION: $12,500 · EducationTHE CAMPANILE…KIDS NEED TO READ: $10,000 · EducationKIDS NEED TO …TOPANGA MOUNTAIN SCHOOL INC: $5,500 · EducationTOPANGA MOUNT…+3 more: $1,100 · EducationGEFFEN PLAYHOUSE INC: $14,250 · Arts & CultureGEFFEN PLA…THE PLANETARY SOCIETY: $9,500 · Arts & CultureTHE PLANET…SAN FERNANDO VALLEY REFUGEE CHILDREN CENTER INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $1,000 · Human ServicesMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,000 · International
Other$89,300Food & Nutrition$70,000Animals$29,500Education$29,100Arts & Culture$23,750Human Services$6,000International$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFeeding America: $70,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTopanga Animal Rescue: $28,500 over 4y, 18% of budgetGEFFEN PLAYHOUSE INC: $14,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CAMPANILE FOUNDATION: $12,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS NEED TO READ: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE PLANETARY SOCIETY: $9,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFULL-CIRCLE LEARNING INC: $9,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetTOPANGA MOUNTAIN SCHOOL INC: $5,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSAN FERNANDO VALLEY REFUGEE CHILDREN CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOLY SPIRIT RETREAT CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHORDOMA FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKHAN ACADEMY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBARD COLLEGE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds Topanga Animal Rescue ↗
  • Who funds GEFFEN PLAYHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CAMPANILE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KIDS NEED TO READ ↗
  • Who funds THE PLANETARY SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds FULL-CIRCLE LEARNING INC ↗
  • Who funds TOPANGA MOUNTAIN SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN FERNANDO VALLEY REFUGEE CHILDREN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HOLY SPIRIT RETREAT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CHORDOMA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAVING HARBIN DOGS INC ↗
  • Who funds KHAN ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BARD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodDC8.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization 455 Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from 455 Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to 455 Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to 455 Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on 455’s filings →

    More from the funding graph