Skip to content

· Private foundation

445 Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$24k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Religion$60kHousing & Shelter$15kEducation$13kHuman Services$9kHealth$8kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kRecreation & Sports$5kCrime & Legal$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$8,250
Median grant
3
States reached
$2k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BIBLICAL MENNONITE ALLIANCE$9,000
Individual grant recipient$8,250
BETHEL CHAPEL$5,000
COLD SPRINGS MENNONITE SCHOOL$1,250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHAZAK RESCUE: $800 → 9%2222 FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
IN
PA
CO
MO
NC
SC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

38%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$51k · 4 repeat orgs$84k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against -11% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
15

Total granted

$51k
$75k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
-11%

Still filing today

25%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
Human ServicesReligionRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BETHEL CHAPEL
    3× · 2022–2024 · $18k
  • BM
    BIBLICAL MENNONITE ALLIANCE INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $17k
  • NH
    NEW HORIZONS MINISTRIES INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $14k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • GP
    GREENWOOD PATHWAY HOUSE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +11%
  • CM
    CENTRAL MIAMI CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -72%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Waymaker International Ministries

WayMaker International Ministries is an inter-denominational mission organization committed to leading Christians in sharing Jesus Christ with the world, encouraging believers, and ministering to the international community.

Religion
2
Global Missions 365 Inc

To share the Gospel of Jesus Christ and support missionaries and ministries.

Religion
3
Manny Arango Ministries Inc

Promote Gods word through understanding the Bible

Religion
4
Africa Harvest Mission Inc

Evangelism, education, providing for the poor.

Religion
5
Bridge of Hope Ministries

Transforming lives in the Ville through access to supportive services and efficacy.

Religion
6
Baja Missions Inc

To demonstrate the love of Jesus by bringing spiritual guidance and physical relief to the people of Baja and the planting of Christ's church in communities in need of the Gospel.

International
7
Hope Alive Inc

Christ-based ministry with the mission of bringing hope and encouragement with christ-like love to emotionally hurting people through mental health counseling and transitonal housing for homeless women with mental illness.

—
8
Meeting God in Missions

Meeting god in missions is a non-denominational ministry seeking to share the salvation message

International
9
Agape Indians Ministries Intl Inc

Agape Indians Ministries International (AIM Int'l) is an evangelical Christian missions agency incorporated in the United States with the vision of training native missionaries for proclaiming the gospel of Jesus Christ, planting churches,…

Religion
10
C2C Ministries

Evangelism, Church Planting, Christian Growth and discipleship.

Religion
11
Youth With a Mission-Maui Inc

Train christian missionaries to spread the gospel.

Religion
12
Church Assistance Ministry

Church Assistance Ministry helps churches in the USA and around the world to multiply their impact by providing leadership development assistance for church leaders and denominations, and church focused missions.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Horizons Ministries Inc; the most unlike its peers is Chazak. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BETHEL CHAPEL: $18,000 · OtherBETHEL CHAPELNEW HORIZONS MINISTRIES INC: $13,500 · OtherNEW HORIZONS MINISTRIES INCIndividual grant recipient: $8,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $8,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPICKENS MENNONITE CHURCH: $6,000 · OtherPICKENS MENNONITE CHURCHCHURCH OF THE NAZARENE: $6,000 · OtherCHURCH OF THE NAZARENECOLD SPRINGS MENNONITE CHURCH: $5,500 · OtherCOLD SPRINGS MENNONITE CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCOLD SPRINGS MENNONITE SCHOOL: $3,250 · OtherFOUNDATOIN 2550: $2,700 · Other+2 more: $3,100 · OtherBIBLICAL MENNONITE ALLIANCE INC: $16,500 · ReligionBIBLICAL MENNON…GOSPEL EXPRESS EVANGELISTIC TEAM MINISTRY INC: $2,500 · ReligionGOSPEL EXPRESS …GREENWOOD PATHWAY HOUSE INC: $15,000 · Housing & ShelterGREENWOOD PA…CENTRAL MIAMI CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC: $10,000 · EducationA Place For Us Ministries Inc: $3,000 · Human Services2222 FOUNDATION: $2,700 · Human ServicesCHAZAK: $800 · Human ServicesCAMP NEW HOPE INC: $5,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$79,300Religion$19,000Housing & Shelter$15,000Education$10,000Human Services$6,500Recreation & Sports$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREENWOOD PATHWAY HOUSE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetNEW HORIZONS MINISTRIES INC: $13,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRAL MIAMI CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCAMP NEW HOPE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetA Place For Us Ministries Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget2222 FOUNDATION: $2,700 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGOSPEL EXPRESS EVANGELISTIC TEAM MINISTRY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHAZAK: $800 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BIBLICAL MENNONITE ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENWOOD PATHWAY HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW HORIZONS MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL MIAMI CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP NEW HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds A Place For Us Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds 2222 FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GOSPEL EXPRESS EVANGELISTIC TEAM MINISTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAZAK ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Anabaptist FoundationPA15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Anabaptist Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization 445 Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from 445 Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to 445 Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to 445 Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on 445’s filings →

    More from the funding graph