Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

41 Washington St Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$146k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$84k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Religion$473kHuman Services$226kHousing & Shelter$101kHealth$64kCivil Rights$62kEducation$46kAnimals$40kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $84k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MUSKEGON RESCUE MISSION$84,000
LOVE IN ACTION$10,000
MEL TROTTER MINISTRIES$10,000
GATEWAY MISSION$10,000
DEGAGE MINISTRIES$5,000
THE OTHER WAY MINISTRIES$5,000
KIDS HOPE USA$5,000
CAMP GENEVA$5,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$5,000
WEDGWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES$2,500
COVENANT LIFE CHURCH$2,000
RESILIENCE$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $136k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%THE OTHER WAY MINISTRIES: $10k → 11%THE OTHER WAY MINISTRIES: $10k → 11%THE OTHER WAY MINISTRIES: $10k → 11%THE OTHER WAY MINISTRIES: $7k → 11%WEDGWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $5k → 11%THE OTHER WAY MINISTRIES: $5k → 11%WEDGWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $3k → 11%THE OTHER WAY MINISTRIES: $5k → 11%WEDGWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $3k → 11%THE OTHER WAY MINISTRIES: $2k → 11%DEGAGE MINISTRIES: $10k → 11%RESILIENCE: $2k → 8%RESILIENCE: $2k → 8%RESILIENCE: $2k → 8%DEGAGE MINISTRIES: $10k → 11%RESILIENCE: $2k → 8%RESILIENCE: $2k → 8%DEGAGE MINISTRIES: $10k → 11%DEGAGE MINISTRIES: $5k → 11%DEGAGE MINISTRIES: $5k → 11%DEGAGE MINISTRIES: $5k → 11%DEGAGE MINISTRIES: $5k → 11%CENTER FOR WOMEN IN TRANSITION: $4k → 8%DEGAGE MINISTRIES: $5k → 11%CENTER FOR WOMEN IN TRANSITION: $2k → 8%THE PEOPLE CENTER: $2k → 8%THE PEOPLE CENTER: $2k → 8%THE PEOPLE CENTER: $2k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.0M · 20 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +55% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
6

Total granted

$1.0M
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+27%

Still filing today

55%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesReligionHealthEducationCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MT
    MEL TROTTER MINISTRIES
    8× · 2017–2024 · $100k · revenue +141%
  • DM
    DEGAGE MINISTRIES
    8× · 2017–2024 · $55k · revenue +74%
  • TO
    THE OTHER WAY MINISTRIES
    7× · 2017–2024 · $49k · revenue +107%

Funded once

  • LI
    LOVE INC
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • D
    DAYBREAK
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
  • DC
    DAYBREAK COMMUNITY CHURCH
    one grant, 2019 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rescue Ministries of Mid-Michigan

Expressing God's love by reaching out to the hurting and homeless of the Great Lakes Bay Region by providing shelter and care, proclaiming the Gospel of Christ, and establishing Christian disciples among disadvantaged people.

Housing & Shelter
2
Detroit Rescue Mission Ministries
Health
3
Refuge of Hope Ministries

Glorify and serve god by providing meals for hungry men, women, and children, emergency shelter and transition to independence for homeless men, and spiritual hope through jesus christ.

Religion
4
Redemption Road Ministries

Redemption road provides housing, re-entry and transition services for men and women coming out of the criminal justice system. the mission is to provide to provide christ centered, bible based recovery from drug and alcohol abuse, damaged…

Religion
5
Ministry Center

We build bridges between people experiencing the immediate effects of poverty and homelessness to the physical and spiritual resources available to alleviate suffering and facilitate long term transformation.

Human Services
6
Christian Recovery Centers Inc

To provide guidance and rehabilitation in a christ centered residential setting for persons with addiction

Health
7
Beacon of Hope

Beacon of hope's mission is to be god's hand offering christ-centered, inclusive, accessible and professional mental health counseling.

Religion
8
Come to Him Ministries

To help those struggling in a personal crisis find relief and disciple them into a christ-centered lifestyle through a ministry of reconciliation, applying the truth of scripture, working with others and sharing in fellowship with those…

Health
9
His Hope Ministries Inc

Helping families fight homelessness and find living hope.

Housing & Shelter
10
Northlands Rescue Mission Inc

To provide a shelter and a place of hope where people can recover from homelessness, pain and addiction, restoring their dignity and improving their lives.

11
Good Samaritan Mission Inc

To care for the needy, share the good news of jesus christ and change lives by providing counseling, life skill training, dignity gained through work and christ-centered discipleship.

12
Barnabas Center

Christian counseling ministry

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Degage Ministries and the most unlike its peers is Barnabas Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MUSKEGON RESCUE MISSION — $300,000 · OtherMUSKEGON RESCUE MISSIONSALVATION ARMY — $110,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYMEL TROTTER MINISTRIES — $100,000 · OtherMEL TROTTER MINISTRIESLAKESHORE RESCUE MISSIONS — $70,000 · OtherLAKESHORE RESCUE MISSIONSLOVE IN ACTION — $60,000 · OtherLOVE IN ACTIONGUIDING LIGHT MINISTRIES — $55,000 · OtherGUIDING LIGHT MINISTRIESOAR - OTTAGAN ADDICTIONS RECOVERY — $37,000 · Other+8 more — $41,550 · Other+8 moreDEGAGE MINISTRIES — $55,000 · Human ServicesDEGAGE MINISTRI…THE OTHER WAY MINISTRIES — $49,000 · Human ServicesTHE OTHER WAY M…RESILIENCE ADVOCATES FOR ENDING VIOLENCE — $16,000 · Human ServicesRESILIENCE ADVO…WEDGWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES — $10,000 · Human ServicesWEDGWOOD CHRIST…THE PEOPLE CENTER INC — $6,000 · Human ServicesKids Hope USA — $46,000 · EducationGENEVA CAMP & RETREAT CENTER — $32,000 · ReligionBARNABAS MINISTRIES — $9,000 · ReligionREACH FOR RECOVERY INC — $15,000 · HealthHEALTH INTERVENTION SERVICES — $7,000 · HealthHOMECOR — $1,000 · Community Improvement
Other$773,550Human Services$136,000Education$46,000Religion$41,000Health$22,000Community Improvement$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMEL TROTTER MINISTRIES — $100,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetDEGAGE MINISTRIES — $55,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetTHE OTHER WAY MINISTRIES — $49,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetKids Hope USA — $46,000 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetGENEVA CAMP & RETREAT CENTER — $32,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetRESILIENCE ADVOCATES FOR ENDING VIOLENCE — $16,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetREACH FOR RECOVERY INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWEDGWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES — $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBARNABAS MINISTRIES — $9,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetHEALTH INTERVENTION SERVICES — $7,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE PEOPLE CENTER INC — $6,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetHOMECOR — $1,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MEL TROTTER MINISTRIES
  • Who funds DEGAGE MINISTRIES
  • Who funds THE OTHER WAY MINISTRIES
  • Who funds Kids Hope USA
  • Who funds GENEVA CAMP & RETREAT CENTER
  • Who funds RESILIENCE ADVOCATES FOR ENDING VIOLENCE
  • Who funds REACH FOR RECOVERY INC
  • Who funds WEDGWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES
  • Who funds BARNABAS MINISTRIES
  • Who funds HEALTH INTERVENTION SERVICES
  • Who funds THE PEOPLE CENTER INC
  • Who funds HOMECOR

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Grand Haven Area Community Foundation IncMI26.1× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Grand Haven Area Community Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of the Holland/Zeeland Area Inc · Barnabas Foundation · Marvin G & Jerene L Dewitt Family Foundation · De Witt Families Conduit Foundation · Peter C & Emajean Cook Foundation · Heart of West Michigan United Way · Grand Rapids Community Foundation · Consumers Energy Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Folkert Family Foundation · Cdv5 Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization 41 Washington St Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph