Skip to content
350org at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

350org

350.org works with people around the world, using online tools to facilitate strategic campaigns, organizing, and public engagement actions to communicate both the realities of science and principles of justice in addressing the climate crisis.

$2.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$117k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$1.4MPublic Benefit$22kCivil Rights$10kCommunity Improvement$10k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $365,946, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,355,618 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,989,672 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k11 grants · $182k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $184k
$17,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$5.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
350 BAY AREA$117,000
350 COLORADO$66,500
BEAUTIFUL TROUBLE INC$25,000
350 SAN DIEGO (SANDIEGO350)$17,250
350 SEATTLE$17,000
350 PDX$17,000
MN 350$17,000
350 MADISON INC (350 WISCONSIN INC)$17,000
350 SACRAMENTO$17,000
350 VERMONT INC$17,000
350 NEW HAMPSHIRE$17,000
DRUM-DESIS RISING UP AND MOVING INC$10,696
BETTER FUTURE PROJECT INC (350 MASSACHUSETTS)$10,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 84% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BETTER FUTURE PROJECT INC (350 MASSACHUSETTS): $36k → 8%POPULAR DISCOURSE: $22k → 11%SOCIAL GOOD FUND I: $6k → 9%OIL & GAS ACTION NETWORK: $18k → 10%350 SAN DIEGO (SANDIEGO350): $36k → 11%350 SACRAMENTO: $17k → 12%NY CLIMATE ADVOCACY PROJECT: $54k → 11%DRUM-DESIS RISING UP AND MOVING INC: $11k → 13%BEAUTIFUL TROUBLE INC: $25k → 17%UPROSE: $15k → 20%PEOPLE'S JUSTICE COUNCILALABAMA INTERFAITH POWER AND LIGHT: $6k → 16%350 MADISON INC (350 WISCONSIN INC): $36k → 10%350 PDX: $36k → 12%350 COLORADO: $107k → 12%350 SEATTLE: $136k → 9%350 VERMONT INC: $36k → 10%MVMT CATALYST: $28k → 8%350 NEW HAMPSHIRE: $39k → 9%BETTER FUTURE PROJECT INC (350 MASSACHUSETTS): $11k → 8%MN 350: $48k → 11%350 BAY AREA: $117k → 10%350 SAN DIEGO (SANDIEGO350): $17k → 11%NY CLIMATE ADVOCACY PROJECT: $25k → 11%NEW YORK COMMUNITIES FOR CHANGE: $5k → 20%350 MADISON INC (350 WISCONSIN INC): $17k → 10%350 PDX: $17k → 12%350 COLORADO: $67k → 12%350 SEATTLE: $17k → 9%350 VERMONT INC: $17k → 10%350 NEW HAMPSHIRE: $17k → 9%MN 350: $36k → 11%350 BAY AREA: $91k → 10%350 COLORADO: $46k → 12%350 SEATTLE: $8k → 9%MN 350: $17k → 11%350 COLORADO: $36k → 12%350 SEATTLE: $7k → 9%MINNESOTA 350: $17k → 11%GLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND: $327k → 12%ALLIANCE FOR JUST SOCIETY: $10k → 9%MN350 ON BEHALF OF MINNESOTA YOUTH CLIMATE STRIKE: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NH
WA
MN
WI
NY
MA
OR
CA
CO
MD
AL

Grants abroad, by region: $2.0M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 4 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$1.4M · 72% · 5 grants

Stated purpose: GENERAL SUPPORT · CLIENT MOVEMENT CAMPAIGN

Sub-Saharan Africa$317k · 16% · 17 grants

Stated purpose: CLIENT MOVEMENT CAMPAIGN

South America$158k · 8% · 6 grants

Stated purpose: CLIENT MOVEMENT CAMPAIGN

East Asia and the Pacific$74k · 4% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: CLIENT MOVEMENT CAMPAIGN

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 21% of 350org’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

350orglessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 12 repeat orgs$176k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
9

Total granted

$1.3M
$124k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+109%

Still filing today

92%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $53k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsEducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • 3B
    350 BAY AREA
    2× · 2024–2025 · $208k · revenue +7%
  • 3W
    350 WISCONSIN INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $199k · revenue +379% · 42% of their budget
  • 3S
    350 Seattle
    4× · 2021–2025 · $168k · revenue +221%

Funded once

  • MC
    MVMT CATALYST
    one grant, 2021 · $28k
  • PD
    POPULAR DISCOURSE
    one grant, 2021 · $22k
  • OG
    OIL & GAS ACTION NETWORKgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $18k · revenue ×12
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
350 Wisconsin Action Inc

350 Wisconsin Action mobilizes concerned climate voters to push for bold climate action from government and elected officials. We keep the climate crisis at the center of the political conversation, and push for progressive policies that…

Environment
2
350 Bay Area Action

Mission: We are building a grassroots climate movement in the Bay Area and beyond to eliminate carbon pollution and achieve a clean energy future with racial, economic, and environmental justice. Our vision is that all who live in the Bay…

Environment
3
350 New Hampshire

To stop the climate crisis by building grassroots support for a just transition to renewable energy and an end to fossil fuel use and expansion. We envision a society with a renewable energy economy that works for all people, where all…

Environment
4
350ORG Action Fund

350.org action fund mobilizes progressive voters, gets climate champions elected, holds fossil-fueled politicians accountable, supports frontline partners, trains young movement leaders through creative campaigning to advocate for…

Environment
5
California Environmental Justice Alliance

Our mission is to fight against fossil fuel executives and industries that have turned our communities into dumping grounds for toxic waste, poisoning our air, water, lan, and bodies. We organize to oppose giant oil refineries, dirty…

Environment
6
MN350 Action

Mn350 action is organized to promote climate justice - an economically and racially just transition to a clean energy economy - through ongoing public education and community organizing throughout minnesota and the midwest. by recruiting…

—
7
Advocates for Climate Innovation
Philanthropy
8
350 Seattle Action

Education and action toward climate justice

—
9
350ORG

350.org works with people around the world, using online tools to facilitate strategic campaigns, organizing, and public engagement actions to communicate both the realities of science and principles of justice in addressing the climate…

Environment
10
Michigan Climate Action Network

Our mission is to amplify connect and support the people organizations and communities demanding urgent bold and equitable solutions for a just transition to a resilient future.

Environment
11
Maine Climate Action Now

MCAN catalyzes transformative education and action in response to the climate crisis. We seek to honor, unite and amplify the voices of youth, frontline communities, and others historically excluded from the climate conversation and…

Environment
12
Center for Contemporary Documentation Inc
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is 350 Colorado; the most unlike its peers is People's Justice Council. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
15/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND: $327,000 · EnvironmentGLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND350 BAY AREA: $208,000 · Environment350 BAY AREA350 WISCONSIN INC: $198,945 · Environment350 WISCONSIN INC350 Seattle: $167,500 · Environment350 Seattle350 COLORADO: $153,027 · Environment350 COLORADOMN350: $122,500 · EnvironmentMN350350 Colorado Action: $102,500 · Environment350 Colorado ActionSANDIEGO350: $53,250 · Environment350PDX: $53,000 · Environment350 VERMONT INC: $53,000 · Environment+4 more: $87,635 · Environment+4 moreNEW YORK CLIMATE ADVOCACY PROJECT: $79,268 · OtherNEW YORK …MVMT CATALYST: $28,000 · OtherMVMT CATA…BEAUTIFUL TROUBLE INC: $25,000 · OtherBEAUTIFUL…POPULAR DISCOURSE: $21,625 · OtherPOPULAR D…350NH Action: $55,500 · Civil RightsNew York Communities For Change Inc: $5,000 · Civil RightsDRUM Desis Rising Up and Moving Inc: $10,696 · Community ImprovementNew York Communities Organizing Fund Inc: $10,000 · Community ImprovementALLIANCE FOR A JUST SOCIETY: $10,000 · Community ImprovementINDIGENOUS ENVIRONMENTAL NETWORK: $10,000 · EducationSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $6,275 · EducationUPROSE INC: $15,000 · Youth Development
Environment$1,526,357Other$153,893Civil Rights$60,500Community Improvement$30,696Education$16,275Youth Development$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND: $327,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budget350 BAY AREA: $208,000 over 2y, 21% of budget350 WISCONSIN INC: $198,945 over 4y, 42% of budget350 Seattle: $167,500 over 4y, 4.7% of budget350 COLORADO: $153,027 over 2y, 17% of budgetMN350: $122,500 over 5y, 5.0% of budget350NH Action: $55,500 over 2y, 37% of budgetSANDIEGO350: $53,250 over 2y, 16% of budget350PDX: $53,000 over 2y, 7.4% of budget350 VERMONT INC: $53,000 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetBETTER FUTURE PROJECT INC: $46,500 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetOIL & GAS ACTION NETWORK: $18,135 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetUPROSE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetNew York Communities Organizing Fund Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetINDIGENOUS ENVIRONMENTAL NETWORK: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetALLIANCE FOR A JUST SOCIETY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $6,275 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew York Communities For Change Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sustainable Markets F…Patagoniaorg350 ColoradoTides FoundationThe Schmidt Family Fo…Climate Emergency FundThe Sunrise Project I…Amalgamated Charitabl…Rockefeller Philanthr…Winslow FoundationEarth Rising Foundati…Wallace Global Fund II
Sustainable Markets FoundationNY32.5× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sustainable Markets Foundation · Patagoniaorg · 350 Colorado · Tides Foundation · The Schmidt Family Foundation · Climate Emergency Fund · The Sunrise Project Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Winslow Foundation · Earth Rising Foundation · Wallace Global Fund II

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization 350org funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from 350org. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to 350org?

    Find your warmest path to 350org through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on 350org’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home