Skip to content
100 Network Inc Fka Wg100 Inc at a glance

· Public charity

100 Network Inc Fka Wg100 Inc

$10,000+ is collectively awarded every quarter to local nonprofits.

$73k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Health$24kCommunity Improvement$17kArts & Culture$9kEnvironment$9kPhilanthropy$9kAnimals$9kRecreation & Sports$8kYouth Development$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $33,760, the rows itemized in this filing. The $72,884 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $39,124 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$8,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$63k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE GREYSON PROJECT INC$9,760
GLORIOUS HANDS INCORPORATED$8,000
CHALLENGE 22 INC$8,000
CENTRAL FLORIDA LIONS YOUTH SPORTS MINISTRY INC$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GLORIOUS HANDS INCORPORATED: $8k → 11%CENTRAL FLORIDA LIONS YOUTH SPORTS MINISTRY INC: $8k → 13%VOICES FOR CHILDREN OF BROWARD COUNTY: $7k → 13%THE JOBS PARTNERSHIP: $6k → 13%THE GREYSON PROJECT INC: $10k → 13%WINTER GARDEN ARTS ASSOCIATION: $9k → 13%FRENCH FAMILY FOUNDATION: $9k → 13%FRIENDS OF LAKE APOPKA: $9k → 13%SOUTHERN CROSS SERVICE DOGS: $9k → 13%CHALLENGE 22 INC: $8k → 13%TRIUMPHANT 'N TREASURED INC: $6k → 13%SHEPHERD'S HOPE: $6k → 13%EIGHT WAVES: $6k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hollys Hope of North Port
Education
2
Kids with Kindness Inc

Do acts of kindness for the community.

—
3
South Brevard German Shepherd Rescue

Adoption of German Shepherd Dogs

—
4
Hope 4 Kids Inc

The purpose of hope 4 kids in is to address,educate, coordinate, and provide relief to those in need in the southwest florida area.our organization provides for the needs of children in in foster care by providing clothing, furniture,…

Human Services
5
Service Dogs for Patriots Inc

Our mission is to serve and support the veterans with post traumatic stress disorder living in north central florida by providing qualified dogs and/or service dog training to them and their dog - thereby improving the quality of life for…

Animals
6
Warrior Paws Inc

Warrior Paws, Inc. missions is to provide veterans and first responders with service dogs to reduce suicide rates and improve quality of life. We will be a resource hub for veteran services, support and referrals.

Human Services
7
Walk On Water Ministries of Central Florida Inc

Walk On Water is a non-profit organization dedicated to giving individuals the opportunity to experience and bond with horses in a safe and loving environment. We are committed to teaching responsibility, self-confidence, teamwork and…

Religion
8
Saving Paws Rescue of Florida Inc

To assist in the medical care, misc care and rehoming of animals that do not have a home

Animals
9
Sebring Angels

To be human angels for animals, advocating for their lives, humane treatment, spay and neuter education and responsible ownership. As a foster based organization save as many dogs as possible who are in jeopardy of euthanasia at Highlands…

Unclassified
10
Raising Hope Dogs

Raising hope dogs acquires and trains dogs to work with professional therapists primarily helping children from low-income families who have autism, behavioral challenges, down syndrome and cerebral palsy to reach their physical, social,…

Health
11
Southeast German Shepherd Rescue in

German Shepherd Rescue including housing, feeding and getting proper veterinarian care. Finding forever homes for rescues.

Animals
12
Wet Noses Animal Rescue Inc

We save dogs in need and provide them with food, shelter and housing, vet care before finding them new loving homes. Our group accepts owner surrenders as well as dogs from county animal control facilities in Georgia.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Voices for Children of Broward County; the most unlike its peers is Winter Garden Art Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/9
Grantees still filing
3/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $10,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFRIENDS OF LAKE APOPKA INCORPORATED: $9,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF LAKE APOPKA INCORPORATEDFRENCH FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $9,000 · OtherFRENCH FAMILY FOUNDATION INCIndividual grant recipient: $6,150 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTRIUMPHANT N TREASURED: $5,800 · OtherTRIUMPHANT N TREASUREDWINTER GARDEN ART ASSOCIATION: $9,100 · Arts & CultureWINTER GARDEN ART…CHALLENGE 22 INCORPORATED: $8,000 · Arts & CultureCHALLENGE 22 INCO…GREYSON PROJECT INC: $9,760 · HealthGREYSON PROJECT…SHEPHERD'S HOPE INC: $5,750 · HealthSHEPHERD'S HOPE…SOUTHERN CROSS SERVICE DOGS: $8,778 · AnimalsCENTRAL FLORIDA LIONS YOUTH SPORTS MINISTRY INC: $8,000 · Recreation & SportsGLORIOUS HANDS INCORPORATED: $8,000 · Youth DevelopmentVOICES FOR CHILDREN OF BROWARD COUNTY: $7,105 · Crime & LegalEight Waves Corporation: $5,600 · Education
Other$40,450Arts & Culture$17,100Health$15,510Animals$8,778Recreation & Sports$8,000Youth Development$8,000Crime & Legal$7,105Education$5,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREYSON PROJECT INC: $9,760 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetWINTER GARDEN ART ASSOCIATION: $9,100 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetSOUTHERN CROSS SERVICE DOGS: $8,778 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetVOICES FOR CHILDREN OF BROWARD COUNTY: $7,105 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetSHEPHERD'S HOPE INC: $5,750 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEight Waves Corporation: $5,600 over 1y, 1.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charit…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA6.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization 100 Network Inc Fka Wg100 Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from 100 Network Inc Fka Wg100 Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on 100 Network Inc Fka Wg100’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home