Skip to content

· Private foundation

100 Hearts 1 Mission Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$61k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$311kCivil Rights$10kAnimals$8kHuman Services$5kInternational$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$4kFood & Nutrition$1kPhilanthropy$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $1k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$11k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Truxton Trust - Sabino Recovery Group$60,000
Tidewell Foundation$1,000
Children International$396
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Paltown Development Foundation: $250 → 6%Blessings in a Backpack: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
MA
CT
CA
CO
MO
KY
MD
AZ
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$263k · 12 repeat orgs$85k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
23

Total granted

$263k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+128%

Still filing today

50%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 1% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $61k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthInternationalHuman ServicesEnvironmentAnimalsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION
    5× · 2018–2023 · $93k · revenue +18%
  • COMMUNITY ACTION STOPS ABUSE INC
    2× · 2017–2021 · $2k · revenue +158%
  • Save The Children Federation Inc
    4× · 2017–2020 · $1k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • E
    EPIC
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • HR
    Hurricane Relief CO Claritza Navarr
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
  • BP
    Blue Pearl Animal Hospital
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
2
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
3
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Inc

To make kids better today and healthier tomorrow.

Health
4
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
5
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
6
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
7
Vitalant

Unite blood and biologics donors, talent, and innovation to save and improve lives.

Health
8
American Cancer Society Inc

Improve the lives of people with cancer and their families through advocacy, research, and patient support, to ensure everyone has an opportunity to prevent, detect, treat, and survive cancer.

Health
9
Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Foundation

To aid the alliance for clinical trials in oncology national clinical trials cooperative group and support the clinical trials and laboratory research of the alliance, as well as efforts to educate the medical community on methods of…

Health
10
Colorado Gives Foundation

We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.

Philanthropy
11
Paypal Charitable Giving Fund

Our vision is to reimagine everyday giving to help charities. our mission is to enable the world's leading online platforms to create opportunities for everyday charitable giving. in doing so, we ensure our programs are trustworthy,…

Philanthropy
12
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Paltown Development Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Aspen Center for Environmental Studies. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Suncoast Hospice Foundation: $131,250 · OtherSuncoast Hospice FoundationTruxton Trust - Sabino Recovery Group: $60,000 · OtherTruxton Trust - Sabino Recovery GroupEmpath Partners in Care: $11,500 · OtherEquality Florida: $10,000 · Other+21 more: $31,307 · Other+21 moreHAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION: $92,533 · HealthHAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION+5 more: $3,340 · HealthChildren International: $3,245 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc: $1,271 · InternationalBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesPALTOWN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $250 · Human ServicesGOFUNDMEORG: $1,110 · PhilanthropyASPEN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES: $353 · EnvironmentINTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC: $200 · Animals
Other$244,057Health$95,873International$4,516Human Services$1,250Philanthropy$1,110Environment$353Animals$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION: $92,533 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetChildren International: $3,245 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION STOPS ABUSE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDEFEAT DIABETES FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $1,271 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG: $1,110 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTIDEWELL FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOLPHINS CYCLING CHALLENGE INC: $540 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASPEN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES: $353 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPALTOWN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS CONNECTICUT INC: $208 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Children International ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION STOPS ABUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds DEFEAT DIABETES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds GOFUNDMEORG ↗
  • Who funds BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC ↗
  • Who funds TIDEWELL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DOLPHINS CYCLING CHALLENGE INC ↗
  • Who funds ASPEN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES ↗
  • Who funds PALTOWN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS CONNECTICUT INC ↗
  • Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization 100 Hearts 1 Mission Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from 100 Hearts 1 Mission Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Special Olympics Connecticut Inc: 42% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Community Action Stops Abuse Inc: 13% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to 100 Hearts 1 Mission Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to 100 Hearts 1 Mission Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on 100 Hearts 1 Mission’s filings →

More from the funding graph