Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

100 Hearts 1 Mission Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$61k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$311kCivil Rights$10kAnimals$8kHuman Services$5kInternational$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$4kFood & Nutrition$1kPhilanthropy$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $1k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$11k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Truxton Trust - Sabino Recovery Group$60,000
Tidewell Foundation$1,000
Children International$396
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Paltown Development Foundation: $250 → 6%Blessings in a Backpack: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
NY
MA
CT
CA
CO
MO
KY
MD
AZ
DC
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$263k · 12 repeat orgs$85k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
23

Total granted

$263k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+68%

Still filing today

50%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 1% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $61k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthInternationalHuman ServicesEnvironmentAnimalsPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION
    5× · 2018–2023 · $93k · revenue +18%
  • COMMUNITY ACTION STOPS ABUSE INC
    2× · 2017–2021 · $2k · revenue +158%
  • Save The Children Federation Inc
    4× · 2017–2020 · $1k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • E
    EPIC
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • HR
    Hurricane Relief CO Claritza Navarr
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
  • BP
    Blue Pearl Animal Hospital
    one grant, 2019 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
2
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
3
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Inc

To make kids better today and healthier tomorrow.

Health
4
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
5
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

6
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
7
Vitalant

Unite blood and biologics donors, talent, and innovation to save and improve lives.

Health
8
American Cancer Society Inc

Improve the lives of people with cancer and their families through advocacy, research, and patient support, to ensure everyone has an opportunity to prevent, detect, treat, and survive cancer.

Health
9
Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Foundation

To aid the alliance for clinical trials in oncology national clinical trials cooperative group and support the clinical trials and laboratory research of the alliance, as well as efforts to educate the medical community on methods of…

Health
10
Colorado Gives Foundation

We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.

Philanthropy
11
Paypal Charitable Giving Fund

Our vision is to reimagine everyday giving to help charities. our mission is to enable the world's leading online platforms to create opportunities for everyday charitable giving. in doing so, we ensure our programs are trustworthy,…

Philanthropy
12
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Paltown Development Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Aspen Center for Environmental Studies. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Suncoast Hospice Foundation — $131,250 · OtherSuncoast Hospice FoundationTruxton Trust - Sabino Recovery Group — $60,000 · OtherTruxton Trust - Sabino Recovery GroupEmpath Partners in Care — $11,500 · OtherEquality Florida — $10,000 · Other+21 more — $31,307 · Other+21 moreHAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION — $92,533 · HealthHAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION+5 more — $3,340 · HealthChildren International — $3,245 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc — $1,271 · InternationalBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesPALTOWN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION — $250 · Human ServicesGOFUNDMEORG — $1,110 · PhilanthropyASPEN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES — $353 · EnvironmentINTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC — $200 · Animals
Other$244,057Health$95,873International$4,516Human Services$1,250Philanthropy$1,110Environment$353Animals$200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION — $92,533 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetChildren International — $3,245 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION STOPS ABUSE INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDEFEAT DIABETES FOUNDATION INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc — $1,271 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG — $1,110 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTIDEWELL FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOLPHINS CYCLING CHALLENGE INC — $540 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASPEN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES — $353 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPALTOWN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS CONNECTICUT INC — $208 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Children International
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION STOPS ABUSE INC
  • Who funds DEFEAT DIABETES FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc
  • Who funds GOFUNDMEORG
  • Who funds BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC
  • Who funds TIDEWELL FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds DOLPHINS CYCLING CHALLENGE INC
  • Who funds ASPEN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
  • Who funds PALTOWN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS CONNECTICUT INC
  • Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization 100 Hearts 1 Mission Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 30%
  • Special Olympics Connecticut Inc42% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc30% of income from government
  • Community Action Stops Abuse Inc13% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to 100 Hearts 1 Mission Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to 100 Hearts 1 Mission Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph