Skip to content
← Canadian charities

Quebec · Registered charity

Maison de Thérapie Victoriaville-Arthabaska

Maison de Thérapie Victoriaville-Arthabaska (Quebec) receives grants from 8 organizations whose Canada Revenue Agency filings report C$111,067 to it, the largest being FONDATION JACQUES & MICHEL AUGER (C$105,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.

C$1.3M
Revenue FY2024
8
Funders on record
C$111k
Grants received
C$181k
Net assets
3/8 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 2%

Against its field

Maison de Thérapie Victoriaville-Arthabaska has grown faster than half of the 879 core health care nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−3% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve1.6mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)11% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 879 core health care nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 (C$630k) Expenses 100 (C$673k) Net assets -1448 (C$-558599)2018 Revenue 109 (C$684k) Expenses 86 (C$579k) Net assets -1178 (C$-454376)2019 Revenue 113 (C$711k) Expenses 94 (C$632k) Net assets -973 (C$-375584)2020 Revenue 156 (C$981k) Expenses 122 (C$822k) Net assets -498 (C$-192189)2021 Revenue 143 (C$898k) Expenses 99 (C$668k) Net assets 100 (C$39k)2022 Revenue 207 (C$1.3M) Expenses 180 (C$1.2M) Net assets 337 (C$130k)2023 Revenue 212 (C$1.3M) Expenses 185 (C$1.2M) Net assets 564 (C$218k)2024 Revenue 203 (C$1.3M) Expenses 195 (C$1.3M) Net assets 470 (C$181k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (203)Expenses (195)Net assets (470)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 22% · 2018 18% · 2019 18% · 2020 45% · 2021 56% · 2022 51% · 2023 55% · 2024 56%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

6% of Maison de Thérapie Victoriaville-Arthabaska’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (6% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 815 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

−C$43k
’17
C$104k
’18
C$79k
’19
C$159k
’20
C$230k
’21
C$91k
’22
C$88k
’23
−C$36k
’24
1.6
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 3 funders, grant income rose C$13k → C$15k.

From the CRA filings of Maison de Thérapie Victoriaville-Arthabaska’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Maison de Thérapie Victoriaville-Arthabaska leans on a few funders — its largest provides 95% of grant income and the top three 98%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Maison de Thérapie Victoriaville-Arthabaska.

95%
largest funder
98%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 80% · 2018 100% · 2019 98% · 2020 94% · 2021 88% · 2022 98% · 2023 99% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

75% of Maison de Thérapie Victoriaville-Arthabaska's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 38% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

98% of Maison de Thérapie Victoriaville-Arthabaska's grant income comes from Quebec funders.

In-province vs out-of-province, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Quebec out of province

Funder regions come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 8 funders put you under-funded among the 169 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Government revenue Maison de Thérapie Victoriaville-Arthabaska reports

Federal, provincial and municipal funding on the organization’s own T3010 return.

FY2024C$714k
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  • 56% of FY2024 revenue
  • As filed, not traced to an award

Organizations like Maison de Thérapie Victoriaville-Arthabaska

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every charity on the CRA register — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Quebec

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own T3010 return, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

94% of spending goes to programs.

Program 94%Management 6%Fundraising 0%

Governance

8
board members

Questions and answers

Who funds Maison de Thérapie Victoriaville-Arthabaska?
Maison de Thérapie Victoriaville-Arthabaska (Quebec) receives grants from 8 organizations whose Canada Revenue Agency filings report C$111,067 to it, the largest being FONDATION JACQUES & MICHEL AUGER (C$105,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Maison de Thérapie Victoriaville-Arthabaska have?
Canada Revenue Agency filings report 8 organizations giving C$111,067 in grants to Maison de Thérapie Victoriaville-Arthabaska, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Maison de Thérapie Victoriaville-Arthabaska?
FONDATION JACQUES & MICHEL AUGER is the largest funder on record, with C$105,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Maison de Thérapie Victoriaville-Arthabaska find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Quebec.

Play a game about who funds Maison de Thérapie Victoriaville-Arthabaska →

These figures are read directly from the CRA's published T3010 data: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 8 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported September 23, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · View the T3010 on the CRA register