Kingsey Falls, QC · Private foundation
Fondation Alain Lemaire
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k5 grants · C$21k
- C$10k–50k1 grant · C$10k
- C$250k+1 grant · C$250k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PARC MARIE-VICTORIN | C$250,000 |
| MAISON DE SOINS PALIATIFS SERCAN | C$10,000 |
| FONDATION CHUS | C$7,021 |
| COUVENT MONT-SAINT-PATRICE | C$6,096 |
| RÉSEAU AUTONOMIE SANTÉ | C$5,000 |
| FONDATION CHARLES BRUNEAU | C$1,500 |
| CHEVALIERS DE COLOMB | C$1,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +30% for the ones you funded once.
15 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$12k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- PMPARC MARIE-VICTORIAN7× · 2017–2024 · C$1.8M · revenue +278%
- MDMAISON DE SOINS PALIATIFS SERCAN4× · 2020–2024 · C$47k · revenue +22%
- FDFONDATION DU CENTRE HOSPITALIER UNIVERSITAIRE DE SHER4× · 2017–2024 · C$40k · revenue +0%
Funded once
- FRFONDATION ROBERT PICHÉone grant, 2019 · C$25k · revenue -95%
- FSFABRIQUE STE-MARGUERITEone grant, 2019 · C$14k · revenue -27%
- FDFONDATION DE L'UNIVERSITÉ DE SHERBROOKEgraduatedone grant, 2017 · C$11k · revenue +140%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Souper-bénéfice
Contribuer au développement des activités médicales de même qu'à la promotion de la recherche sous toutes ses formes dans la région du saguenay
Encourager soutenir et améliorer les soins et le développement de la techologie de l'hôpital pierre-boucher.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fondation Rene-Verrier and the most unlike its peers is La Papeterie Saint-Gilles Société Artisanale. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PARC MARIE-VICTORIAN ↗
- Who funds COUVENT MONT SAINT-PATRICE ↗
- Who funds MAISON DE SOINS PALIATIFS SERCAN ↗
- Who funds FONDATION DU CENTRE HOSPITALIER UNIVERSITAIRE DE SHER ↗
- Who funds FONDATION ROBERT PICHÉ ↗
- Who funds CORRIDOR APPALACHIEN ↗
- Who funds FONDATION HOTEL DIEU D'ARTHABASKA ↗
- Who funds FABRIQUE STE-MARGUERITE ↗
- Who funds FONDATION DE L'UNIVERSITÉ DE SHERBROOKE ↗
- Who funds MUSÉE DE LA GASPÉSIE ↗
- Who funds FONDATION CHARLES BRUNEAU ↗
- Who funds PAPETERIE ST GILLES ↗
- Who funds RÉSEAU AUTONOMIE SANTÉ ↗
- Who funds VILLAGE QUÉBECOIS D'ANTAN ↗
- Who funds FONDATION S.E.R.V.I.R BOIS-FRANCS INC. ↗
- Who funds FONDATION DES AMIS DE L'AVIATION ROYALE DU CANADA ↗
- Who funds CENTRE DE PRÉVENTION SUICIDE ARTHABASKA-ÉRABLE ↗
- Who funds FONDATION RENÉ-VERRIER ↗
- Who funds FONDATION DE LA MAISON MICHEL SARRAZIN ↗
- Who funds SOCIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DU CANCER ↗
- Who funds PROCUE ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds FONDATION DE L'ERMITAGE ↗
- Who funds CHEVALIERS DE COLOMB ↗
- Who funds ACTION TOXICOMANIE ↗
- Who funds MAISON DE THÉRAPIE VICTORIAVILLE-ARTHABASKA ↗
- Who funds MAISON AUBE-LUMIÈRE ↗
- Who funds CENTRE DE PRÉVENTION DU SUICIDE CÔTE-NORD ↗
- Who funds FIDUCIE DES FONDS DE CHARITE DU CLUB RICHELIEU-VICTORIAVILLE ↗
- Who funds LÉGION ROYALE CANADIENNE CAISSE DU COQUELICOT ↗
- Who funds MAISON MARIE-PAGÉ ↗
- Who funds LEUCAN ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fondation St-Hubert · Fondation de la Famille Lemaire · Fondation Jacques & Michel Auger · Fondation Desjardins · Fondation Famille François et Monique Bourgeo · Conam Charitable Foundation · Fondation Sibylla Hesse · Fondation Québec Philanthrope · Fondation Frontenac · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Centraide Du Grand Montréal · Fondation J Armand Bombardier
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.