Skip to content

Kingsey Falls, QC · Private foundation

Fondation Alain Lemaire

C$281k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$250k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k5 grants · C$21k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$10k
  • C$250k+1 grant · C$250k
C$6,096
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$561k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PARC MARIE-VICTORINC$250,000
MAISON DE SOINS PALIATIFS SERCANC$10,000
FONDATION CHUSC$7,021
COUVENT MONT-SAINT-PATRICEC$6,096
RÉSEAU AUTONOMIE SANTÉC$5,000
FONDATION CHARLES BRUNEAUC$1,500
CHEVALIERS DE COLOMBC$1,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$2.0M · 15 repeat orgsC$98k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +30% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
18

Total granted

C$2.0M
C$86k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+30%

Still filing today

93%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • PM
    PARC MARIE-VICTORIAN
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$1.8M · revenue +278%
  • MD
    MAISON DE SOINS PALIATIFS SERCAN
    4× · 2020–2024 · C$47k · revenue +22%
  • FD
    FONDATION DU CENTRE HOSPITALIER UNIVERSITAIRE DE SHER
    4× · 2017–2024 · C$40k · revenue +0%

Funded once

  • FR
    FONDATION ROBERT PICHÉ
    one grant, 2019 · C$25k · revenue -95%
  • FS
    FABRIQUE STE-MARGUERITE
    one grant, 2019 · C$14k · revenue -27%
  • FD
    FONDATION DE L'UNIVERSITÉ DE SHERBROOKEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$11k · revenue +140%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fondation médicale des laurentides et des pays-d'en-haut
—
2
Fondation le Piolet
—
3
Fondation Histoire et Commémorations
—
4
La Fondation Santé
—
5
Fondation Toxi-Co-GÎTes Denis Laventure
—
6
Fondation SantÉ De Papineau
—
7
Fondation Richelieu Laurentienne

Souper-bénéfice

—
8
La Fondation de l'Université Laval
—
9
Fondation Quebecoise Pour La Protection Du Patrimoine Naturel
—
10
Fondation 'La Maison Notre-Dame Du Saguenay'

Contribuer au développement des activités médicales de même qu'à la promotion de la recherche sous toutes ses formes dans la région du saguenay

—
11
Fondation Pierre-Boucher

Encourager soutenir et améliorer les soins et le développement de la techologie de l'hôpital pierre-boucher.

—
12
Fondation de la vallée du Richelieu
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fondation Rene-Verrier and the most unlike its peers is La Papeterie Saint-Gilles Société Artisanale. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
23/31
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPARC MARIE-VICTORIAN — C$1,784,536 over 7y, 18% of budgetCOUVENT MONT SAINT-PATRICE — C$51,807 over 4y, 12% of budgetMAISON DE SOINS PALIATIFS SERCAN — C$46,600 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetFONDATION DU CENTRE HOSPITALIER UNIVERSITAIRE DE SHER — C$39,916 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCORRIDOR APPALACHIEN — C$15,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetFONDATION HOTEL DIEU D'ARTHABASKA — C$14,495 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFABRIQUE STE-MARGUERITE — C$14,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetFONDATION DE L'UNIVERSITÉ DE SHERBROOKE — C$11,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMUSÉE DE LA GASPÉSIE — C$10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFONDATION CHARLES BRUNEAU — C$9,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPAPETERIE ST GILLES — C$6,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetRÉSEAU AUTONOMIE SANTÉ — C$5,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetVILLAGE QUÉBECOIS D'ANTAN — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFONDATION S.E.R.V.I.R BOIS-FRANCS INC. — C$5,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetFONDATION DES AMIS DE L'AVIATION ROYALE DU CANADA — C$3,900 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetCENTRE DE PRÉVENTION SUICIDE ARTHABASKA-ÉRABLE — C$3,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetFONDATION RENÉ-VERRIER — C$3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION DE LA MAISON MICHEL SARRAZIN — C$2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DU CANCER — C$1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROCUE ALLIANCE — C$1,288 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION DE L'ERMITAGE — C$1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHEVALIERS DE COLOMB — C$1,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetACTION TOXICOMANIE — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMAISON DE THÉRAPIE VICTORIAVILLE-ARTHABASKA — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAISON AUBE-LUMIÈRE — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRE DE PRÉVENTION DU SUICIDE CÔTE-NORD — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFIDUCIE DES FONDS DE CHARITE DU CLUB RICHELIEU-VICTORIAVILLE — C$1,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetLÉGION ROYALE CANADIENNE CAISSE DU COQUELICOT — C$800 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetMAISON MARIE-PAGÉ — C$500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLEUCAN — C$200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fondation St-HubertQC12.7× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fondation St-Hubert · Fondation de la Famille Lemaire · Fondation Jacques & Michel Auger · Fondation Desjardins · Fondation Famille François et Monique Bourgeo · Conam Charitable Foundation · Fondation Sibylla Hesse · Fondation Québec Philanthrope · Fondation Frontenac · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Centraide Du Grand Montréal · Fondation J Armand Bombardier

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 877580985:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Fondation Alain Lemaire’s filings →